MR. DUTT HAVE ALREADY SUFFERED A LOT DURING LAST 14 YEARS HE WAS UNDERTRIAL FOR 18 MONTHS SO I THINK 6 YEARS IS TOOOO MUCH. HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY A VERY HEAVY FINE FOLLOWED BY SENTENCE OF 2-3 YEARS. I THINK THIS JUDGEMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER. HE WILL NOW GO TO SUPREME COURT AND THE CASE WILL STRETCH FOR ANOTHER 2-3 YEARS. BY THIS TIME MR.DUTT WILL HONOR ALL HIS COMMITMENTS AND TURN 50 AND HENCE WILL BE LET OFF LETS WAIT AND WATCH BUT PITTY ON MR.DUTT WHO IS GOING THRU THIS TRAUMA
RE:IMPRISONMENT
by Umesh umee on Jul 31, 2007 02:08 PM Permalink
Miss Deepali Y do U only PITTY Mr.DUTT, did u ever thought about the trauma underwent by the PPL who suffered the 93 blast???????? The Y do not show UR pity on the relatives of the dead???????? cos they are not a Silver Screen STAR????
RE:IMPRISONMENT
by minisha on Jul 31, 2007 02:12 PM Permalink
i feel ashamed when i read such messages how can u people be so insensitve that u start taking side of a criminal ..Mr.Dutt and all..Vow great we have such citizens
RE:IMPRISONMENT
by anish dharwadkar on Jul 31, 2007 02:03 PM Permalink
what about the people who got killed in 1993? do u have any sympathy for them. Pls dont go on his gandhigiri. He may be a good actor but that doesnt mean he a good person
RE:RE:IMPRISONMENT
by Kabir Duggal on Jul 31, 2007 02:03 PM Permalink
Do we show trauma to all those who suffer. The law must be uniform, just because he is an actor, why should be given special treatment, we need to judge things objectively. So many ppl convicted have trauma and financial obligations, get over it!
