MR. DUTT HAVE ALREADY SUFFERED A LOT DURING LAST 14 YEARS HE WAS UNDERTRIAL FOR 18 MONTHS SO I THINK 6 YEARS IS TOOOO MUCH. HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY A VERY HEAVY FINE FOLLOWED BY SENTENCE OF 2-3 YEARS. I THINK THIS JUDGEMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER. HE WILL NOW GO TO SUPREME COURT AND THE CASE WILL STRETCH FOR ANOTHER 2-3 YEARS. BY THIS TIME MR.DUTT WILL HONOR ALL HIS COMMITMENTS AND TURN 50 AND HENCE WILL BE LET OFF LETS WAIT AND WATCH BUT PITTY ON MR.DUTT WHO IS GOING THRU THIS TRAUMA
