Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Aurangzeb
by hisham ahmad on Feb 16, 2007 02:30 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Aurangzeb ruled India for over 50 years.His empire was bigger than that of Akbar.There were many a hindu in his court.Indian culture flourished under him.But he was a devout muslim.Criticising him is easy for us but does any one know that he used to sew caps and write the quran for a living.He did not take money fom the state treasure.Francois Gautier and many like him try to tell our history to us.They would do better if they did something about their own imperial misdeeds like the Algerian massacre by the French in which 55000 algiers were killed by the french.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
  RE:Aurangzeb
by Suresh Kumar on Feb 16, 2007 02:49 PM   Permalink
Hmm, why doesn't it sound odd that you say this? Oh yeah! you're a Muslim!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Aurangzeb
by prashant pendurkat on Feb 16, 2007 02:32 PM   Permalink
salute u hisham,muslims finally show their colour.u mean to say sikh religionw as joke and started just to make fun and enjoy and grow their hair.
even we all agree on the fact that he was devout muslim, and tahts why he killed lakhs of hindus, wat more can u expect from a devout muslim

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Aurangzeb
by hisham ahmad on Feb 16, 2007 02:42 PM   Permalink
Wat evidence is there he killed lakhs of hindus by the way.Read history from all angles.and wat about the sikhs killed in the 1984 riots anyway?did Aurangzeb or muslims kill them?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Aurangzeb
by prashant pendurkat on Feb 16, 2007 02:46 PM   Permalink
ok hishaam u mean to , 84 was massacre(4000 killed), gujrat was massacre(10000 killed),
But hindus 4 lkahs migrated from kashmir,50 lakhs killed in bangladesh,50 % hindus in pakistan disappearing every year. oh this is not massacre, this just fun or wat

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:Aurangzeb
by Prince Sarin on Feb 16, 2007 02:57 PM   Permalink
Prashant, I think its '40 lakhs' kashmiri pundits who have been forcibly migrated to change the religious mix-up in extreme favour of Islamic Kashmir..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Aurangzeb
by Ubedur Rehman on Feb 16, 2007 03:14 PM   Permalink
hey y don't u re-convert them now.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Aurangzeb
by davinder vashisht on Feb 16, 2007 02:54 PM   Permalink
Hindus didn't kill sikhs in 1984, its was congress who killed them. Shame on Congress and their workers.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Aurangzeb
by Ubedur Rehman on Feb 16, 2007 03:10 PM   Permalink
what else can we expect from a fanatic like u.
now don't start ok u fool .. look what modi a doing in gujrat. when u don't know anything abt a religion then don't speak also.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Aurangzeb
by ashutosh sharma on Feb 16, 2007 02:46 PM   Permalink
little doubt here hisham...if hindus flourished under him..why do we have converted muslims in india..?? You think that was a delebrate decision of those people...??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Aurangzeb
by Mandar Joshi on Feb 16, 2007 02:56 PM   Permalink
Sewing caps and writing Quran for a living has nothing to do with the atrocities Aurangzeb did with his Hindu subjects. The atrocities inflicted by French do not justify the atrocities Aurangzeb inflicted.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb