Hi Dinesh, friend, I dont want to say that constitution has flaws in itself. I just want to say that we have amended constitution for so many time, it reflects that nothing could be right for all the time. The only CONSTANT thing in the world is CHANGE! Furthermore I want to add that we should always be ready to accept change and shouldnt take anything as rigid. I said this with the reference that if we can amend the constitution why we should not amend the objectives of ncbc and more widely why we should not revise our current reservation policy based on castes?
As a reference to your point of manhandling of Dalits by example of Bhotmange, you again have come to my point. We are having reservation for 60 years but still we could not change the society by reservation, then has the reservation solved our objective? Actually the outcomes of this reservation policy has created great anger in the mind of open category people and so such incidences are increasing day by day. So it is my fear that this reservation policy may worsen the condition.Really we need social reforms instead of reservation and that is what I want to bring your attention to.
RE:plz dont misunderstand
by dinesh kumar on Apr 28, 2007 09:25 PM Permalink
yogesh,do u sincerely believe that there has been no change since independence? change has occurred and more change has to take place. the problem u are facing is one of misconceived fear. well,u tell me how the upper castes are being affected by this quota.if u can give me details about the cutoff marks for upper castes,obc s ,sc s and st s,we will see what injustice prevails. can u also give me a percentage of the brahmin community and other upper castes in maharashtra. you impute faults to every institution.for a debate,you have to define the boundaries.are we debating to write a new constitution? this carping on creamy layer is such a poor reflection on your thought processes.u are not able to focus on the bigger change,instead u are focussing on the trivial issues. every state government has consistently made efforts to remove the economically better off communities.but u have no information about that?earlier everyone was focussing on the point that reservation was being conducted on a caste basis,the point was raised that mandal used economic criteria to determine the obc s. but you are just going on and on and on. well,now u give me some figures?
