Sonia's Sachar commission discovered poverty of Muslims. Muslim's current plight is due to the fact that they are poor even before they become Muslims. And once they become Muslims, Islam's oppressive and backward idealogy suppress any liberal, progressive voice, and retain the Muslim people poor, and whenever possible to worse. Women are discouraged to get educated, and no freedom either from the legal process. When women of a community is oppressed that community can never grow up. And as long as Muslims follow Islam they can never see a glint of light in their poverty. Being this the case, the Islamic leaders are asking for more cut not to improve their kinsmen's plight but to expand their power. Poverty is common in all the Indian communities, also the impoverishment of development. But, a poor hindu can become rich as his religion is liberal and progressive. Not with Islam. It is time Muslims understand that the cause lies squarely on their religion and the solution clearly lies in crossing over the mound of misery to the green pasture of liberal attitude and accepting the existence of pluralality.
RE:Sachar Findings - How ''Sach'' hai, ye Sachar?
by Indian muslim on Dec 17, 2006 02:07 PM Permalink
<<<<And once they become Muslims, Islam's .... Lets compare India with Malaysia, a muslim majority country, which has Shariat laws of justice... Both got independence at the same time, both have nearly the same natural resources... Why muslim majority Malaysia is now a developed country and hindu majority India's 70% population lives below Poverty line? Any answer? It is must for every muslim, either men or women, to get education. It is one of the main tenets of Islam. First know the facts before commenting on something. Any poor, hindu or muslim can become rich if the government and its policy makes a positive environment for development. If you think that only hindus can become rich, then why 50crore hindus are poor now? It is a responsibility of every indian to make not just muslims, but all indians developed economically. I'll just share a scenario here. Two brothers, one is much elder and and has half filled stomach, and other boy is very young and weak. If the food is there only for one person, then who should get the food? Weak and small boy or Elder and half-stomach filled boy? If your answer is not influenced by your hatred towards muslims,then you'll hv soltn
RE:Sachar Findings - How ''Sach'' hai, ye Sachar?
by Kaushik Das on Dec 19, 2006 12:13 AM Permalink
So, did independence give us crores and crores of money to invest? Because of muslims, we were partitioned and there also, our people were killed by yours and 55 crores were paid to muslims in pakistan. . Crores of rupees go towards protecting our country from muslims of the same pakistan (bloody wretched, ungrateful ones) and now even bangladesh (even more ungrateful ones). Malaysia does not have to spend so much money. . In Malaysia, the minority is a peaceful non-muslim one. In India, it is a violent, muslim one. THAT is the difference. Every now and then, there is a bomb blast in India - not so in Malaysia. Now, do you have any answers to this?
