What should be the punishment for such a incompetent Pathologist who mis lead the entire probe and responsible for futile speculations in the media and by the fans.
RE:Punishment
by Ramesh(Aditya IT) on Jun 03, 2007 08:36 PM Permalink
So sad Satya, that you had bought the story by the jamaican police! its all crystal clear that they have been "bought"! by those bigwigs! The same shields once said he is 100% sure that Bob was murdered! and later the same shileds took long leave and went off! Another pathologist Dr.Nat says bruices on neck is due to post mortem! how many post mortems does he do like that!!!?which leaves strangulation marks on neck?
All these are games to save some "influential" people! and sad that people are doubting the credentials of efficient and sincere people like sheshaiah!
I am not supporting or blaming anyone, but if you follow the whole episode one will understand what is this game all about!
RE:Punishment
by Satyanarayana Maddi on Jun 04, 2007 03:17 AM Permalink
Dear Mr. Ramesh Yes, I did follow it carefully. Very initially that Dr. Sheshiah said he was not sure and it is confusing. That time itself he would have asked for second opinion as asking for second opinion is not against the law but it is usually followed in such difficult and/or high profile cases. We should not support Dr. Shehsiah just because he is from India. People like Sheshiah goes abroad by hook or crook by producing false certificates etc. And see now his incompetent nature only put him in trouble.
The investigation is led by group from different backgrounds not solely by Jamaican or by Scotland yard police. And we have been seeing there are no official reports all these days from authorities but only by speculations in the media. The police were breaking their heads to find out the clue based on Sheshiah's report.
RE:Punishment
by aaaa on Jun 04, 2007 10:59 AM Permalink
Hey Styanarayana, Your analysis is totally wrong. First of all,people who go abroad by hook or crook do not reach the levels of doing the type things that Shesiah did. Second, he clearly said his report is inconclusive. At that time he was severly criticised.Now it seems his conclusion was correct. Third it is not burden to ask for a second test.It is thew investigating officers decision. Fourth how can you say that the Brithish pathologist was correct. This again shows your inferior mentality.
RE:RE:Punishment
by chinna on Jun 04, 2007 11:43 PM Permalink
Yes.. how can they say mr Nat report is correct.. btw.. he just saw photos.. And Mr seshaish actually saw the body..... This is a game of ICC
