Hey Styanarayana, Your analysis is totally wrong. First of all,people who go abroad by hook or crook do not reach the levels of doing the type things that Shesiah did. Second, he clearly said his report is inconclusive. At that time he was severly criticised.Now it seems his conclusion was correct. Third it is not burden to ask for a second test.It is thew investigating officers decision. Fourth how can you say that the Brithish pathologist was correct. This again shows your inferior mentality.
