choice is for people! who wanted to stay stayed who wanted to move was to move! partition was demography! in interior Sind of pakistan many hindus stayed and never migrated like may muslims in india! so we arent discussing that we are discussing the simple rule to decide about princely states! everyone in india knows that a plebescite means an end to indian claim on kashmir,if not then there wouldnt been 7 lakh army deployed there. Punajb had 60-40 muslim domination but was divided and majority of the deaths happened there,ferozpur people knew that they will be in pakistan until 8aug but on 17th the story was different. 99 percent was the population and now its less than 2 percent many got killed in the same manner sikhs and hindus of lahore and lyallpur. It was politics but what aches me is when india claims kashmir as its crown while fully knowing the reality of accession. Pak is no angel we have faults as well that resulted in loss of E Pak now bangladesh but if pak employs the same notion on kashmir today then it becomes "terrorism" but in 1971 india supported bengalis then it was freedom struggle. one mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist holds true! If we are so confident tht is pak and india then let plebescite to go forward and as they say in urdu "doodh ka doodh pani ka pani hojay ga" everything will be crystal clear! I must appreciate u tht atleast u agreed that they shud have gone to pakistan. I solmenly say junagadh and hyderabad after police action re
