>>>Valmiki proudly says to Ram, 'I am the 10th son of Pracheta, and I never remember speaking even one untrue sentence'. How can such a missionary and follower of truth could have written an imaginary story of Ram?
God must know all and should know about valmik. Ram was not god, he could have been a good king, ruler etc, but certainly not god.
>>>6. Even if by default we accept that Ram and Ramayana are the imagination of a poet, then at least we accept that the poet was real and lived on this earth, and was not imaginary. No one has ever doubted that Valmiki lived. His life has been chronicled in detail in Skand Puran, Bhavishya Puran and Adhyatma Ramayana. When Valmiki meets Ram for the first time, he says, as given in Valmiki Ramayana (7.96.19):
Just because the author existed, does his novel become true, then what about the present time fiction, is it all true. The writer of this article has illogical thinking.
>>> When a man has begun to be ashamed of his ancestors and his past, the end has come'.
Why should i not question my ancestors?? Why should i glorify wrongs/crimes of my ancestors or not be ashamed of them?? this is twisted logic without any reason. the author is doing double talk, just to justify his writing. Very far from truth.
