Ram Exists, Ram Does not exist, Ram existed few thousand years back, Ram'a existance is not a History but mythology....and so on. So many opinions and so much of an chaos. Can we debate on some issues which are more important than these. Important issue is "If some millions are having a faith in Ram, what does this faith is giving rise to? " If this faith makes them strong and determined to follow the Path of truth and believe in all the good qualities and inspires them for building a "Maryadashil" i.e. Selfcontrolled character into them; It is really good. Mere Existance of Ram is not important; important is the existance of ideologies of Ram. Ram or Krishna are the charactors which are not meant to be tested on scientific and physical sciences but they are more importantly to be tested by the principles , teachings and the messages given by these characters. If we try to follow these , Ram Exists even today. If we do not follow this, Ram never existed because his teachings and charishma can not be so weak that we forget these within a short span of few thousand years. As far as the bridge " RAMSETU" is concerned, the issue is bringing out "Demonic nature of Ravana" within us and suppressing "Godly characteristics of Ram" . So it makes us believe that "Ravana" is the truth and "Ram" is Myth in todays context. May be the demonic stance of destroying the natural-supernatural treasure of the Natures (Or Rama's) Special creation for a few thousand dollor
