hmm.. well, point taken... but still... even if what you're saying is true, the fact remains that there are other pressing issues rather than debating the existance of ram... besides, the affidavit only said that there is no historical evidence to PROVE that ram existed, NOT that ram DID NOT EXIST.
Both are seperate issues and different statements.
they aren't saying that ram dint exist... they are only saying that it can't be proved... which is fair enough, really, since its a matter of faith
