it is quite sad that the ASI has said that there is no historical proof for Ram.let me ask as i am not aware..is there a definite 100% proof that hazratbal does indeed have the hair of the Prophet Mohamad? what abt the temple in srilanka which is "believed" to have the tooth of buddha?like another person asked..what abt birth of jesus..can a virgin give birth..probably es today with artificial insemination..but in those times..aaltho i am in favor of any move that will improve the conditions of Indians,and i would support ASI if it had just said that there seems to be no proof that the bridge is manbuilt..but to say that there is no Ram..atrocious!! it is indeed a cruel joke to hear that Ram doesnt exist..i wonder if any other Govt in the world will ever make such a downright insensitive remark on a religious matter. I guess the ASI only believes that the Taj is is the only worth structure defending in this country..God help this nation..run by incompetent nincompoops in virtually every field!!
