it is quite sad that the ASI has said that there is no historical proof for Ram.let me ask as i am not aware..is there a definite 100% proof that hazratbal does indeed have the hair of the Prophet Mohamad? what abt the temple in srilanka which is "believed" to have the tooth of buddha?like another person asked..what abt birth of jesus..can a virgin give birth..probably es today with artificial insemination..but in those times..aaltho i am in favor of any move that will improve the conditions of Indians,and i would support ASI if it had just said that there seems to be no proof that the bridge is manbuilt..but to say that there is no Ram..atrocious!! it is indeed a cruel joke to hear that Ram doesnt exist..i wonder if any other Govt in the world will ever make such a downright insensitive remark on a religious matter. I guess the ASI only believes that the Taj is is the only worth structure defending in this country..God help this nation..run by incompetent nincompoops in virtually every field!!
RE:RE:RAM
by Secret on Sep 13, 2007 08:12 AM Permalink
I agree...Most of the politicians are BRAINLESS. This is sensitive issue and they should note even think to touch it without any fear of millions of people around the world. It seems as if they deliberately made this statement to hurt religious feelings of those who are not supposed to be their vote banks. So cheap and mean mentality they have. They should not forget that people who believe in rama are all INDIANS and not ONLY hindus. Indians who are Hindus for whom nobody seem to care nowadays.
RE:RAM
by Hari Puttar on Sep 13, 2007 08:08 AM Permalink
IT IS THE SAME ASI WHICH FOUND THE PROOF OF RAM TEMPLE EXISTING UNDER THE BABRI STRUCTURE. WHY DONT THEY TAKE ACTION ON THOSE FINDINGS AND RESTORE THE RAM TEMPLE THERE ?
