bismillah ur rahman ir raheem firstly all thanks to Allah firstly i would like to praise this kafir who has brought out certain facts that no one wanted to talk about. aurangzeb indeed was hardline sunni who thought that shias too were not muslims many shias were persecuted during his regime , in fact shias suffered more so than hindus . one reason for this was that although he was sunni king his army depended heavily on rajputs , just like most sunni armies of the past did . hence although he persecuted hindus he could not go all out as that would lead to open revolt by all hindus in his army and his sunni empire would end. as far as shias go he had no such dependancies , so he did whatever he could to destroy shias, who are the true followers of prophet ( sallallahu allayhe wassalam ) and who have stood faithfully behind the prophet( sallallahu allayhe wassalam )'s family. hence instead of criticising this man as agent of hindus or some other organisation , it is best we focussed on the truth that he has brought forward and accept it , for Allah loves not those who reject the truth. Ahmed Shah
