In a land, tarnished in recent memory by Babri Masjid, Godhra, Bombay '92....it is difficcult to understand what 'Rediff' is trying to do by publishing such articles.
To the historians, I would say that if the greatest truth in history is capable of taking a single life in present, then it is not worth knowing.
Why don't we concentrate more on Ashoka or Akbar, than an Aurangazeb. After all, ''what you believe is what you want to believe''....it is not necesarily the fact.
Every public media has a social responsibility and I would like to wish that 'Rediff' will have second thoughts before bublishing articles that are not really fit for our times.
