Agreed, Muslims are a revisionist lot since you have proved to all and sundry that the prophet himself was violent, was a bad example and Muslims were the first victims of Islam. Now that you have made them feel guilty of their religion, their very origins, I have a few questions for you.
What makes the HIndu fundamentalists behave like maniacs although they are products of a great world civilisation called Hinduism. When you question the very basis of the origin of Islam and label it as fundamentally violent, you fail to notice anything good about the religion. Your arguments seem to have only one end: To prove to the Muslim that his religion has no place in a modern setup. But you stop at that. You don't suggest an alternative for them. Realistically, do you think your approach adds any value to the debate on reducing Hindu Muslim tensions.
Now, I would like an answer that does not state your opposition to evils of certain Hindu practises, because you have not applied that rationale to Islam and its followers.
