RE:This is a sad day....
by R A on May 29, 2008 01:00 AM Permalink
Uptil now, India was thinking and preparing itslef for a possible fight with two nations (China and Porkistan) at one time but now India has to be well prepared because third is also going to be in the list now.
- At last, the only Hindu Kingdom now gone forever.
We hindus only know how to shout slogans and abuse others. on
But the fact is that we do not have inner resilience. And the people who claim to safeguard Hindus do not have the desired honesty and integrity to actually protect Hindus and Hinduism.
For them it is just a road to power.
Otherwise, Nepal Hindu Kingdom would be still there.
Look at China.
It has become so pragmatic and has emerged as a super economic power inspite of being a communist country.
That's blending the today's outlook with traditional value system.
I wish the king could adopt a similar model.
I wish our Hindu leaders in India could mobilise people "silently" towards Hindu spiritualism so that the World could take note of Hinduism.
No. Our Hindu Leaders chose to shout slogans and abuse other religions.
Why couldn't we send our messengers to the jungles of Amazon and deserts in Africa or villages in Europe and spread the Hinduism, like Christians have been doing for centuries ?
The VHP could have played a pivotal role in spreading Hinduism across the continents.
But the narrow vision has made VHP a just local organisation with petty and smallish objective.
When the so called Hindu Leaders keep themselves occupied abusing Sonia & co with choicest abuses, how can they think big?
How can they think global?
Well, the innermost defence to Hindustan has fallen.
Hindu Nepalese have fallen victim a very large conspiracy.
Whatever be it,the Nepali maoists influence on Indian Maoists and naxalites would be there especially in adjoining states of nepal likeBihar, Jharkand, UP and West BEngal..
India has to deal carefully with the new rulers of Nepal.
RE:India has to be careful about Nepali Maoists and their indian connection
by Bihar Badshah on May 29, 2008 12:44 AM Permalink
Raghavan Saheb, You brought good point but missed Andhra Pradesh conveniently, which has one of the biggest Naxal issue..why feel ashamed of being mentioned in same breath with Bihar and other mentioned states...India should re-design its states..it has failed to bring development..only 4-5 states benefitted and that too on central funds, which has been syphoned from poor states along with others...Redraw the indian states map...It stinks...MNS and ULFA is just the tip of the iceberg..more to follow soon...
what a tragic end to this great dynasty who has seen good rulers like Birendra and Mahendra. I respect the feelings of nepalese as monarchy did not meet their needs and common people was felt cheated corruption was increasing and gyanendra did not pay attention to common man it is this--- the common man---- that has all the powers at last but beware of the politicians we have the same system of democracy here in our country and all can see what these bloody politicians have made our beautiful land that should not with nepal lets pray and 3 cheers for the victory of common man in nepal Hip Hip Hurray
nepal becoming democratic is good but the maosits in power will not be the good thing...and the king shud b treated better than what he is being treated at present
RE:Another hindu country got this 'sick' term
by tamil on May 28, 2008 11:55 PM Permalink
so they r backward.. Iran started making some secular changes & so do they hav some developments
RE:Another hindu country got this 'sick' term
by Hassan Talal Maitla on May 29, 2008 01:00 AM Permalink
You have made an intellectually dishonest statement. I have been to Iran and I know how much Islamic and progressive they are. Years of sanctions has not demoralised the Islamic republic. Islamic oriented party AKP in Turkey has been responsible for it's economics success. That is the reason the muslim countries in particular in Arab states have entered the post-nationalist secular era which dominated these countries in 1960s and 1970s. No wonder the secular dictator of Egypt Husseni Mubarak has been facing immense opposition from the Islamic party Muslim Brotherhood supported by the vast majority. Morocco, Aljeria, Uzbekistan have also witnessed the growing popularity of Islamic parties.
RE:RE:Another hindu country got this 'sick' term
by Hassan Talal Maitla on May 29, 2008 12:35 AM Permalink
Your being intellectually dishonest by making this erroneous claim. It was the SECULAR army of Turkey which brought four coups and it were the useless secularist who plunged the economy of Turkey in 2001 until the Islamic oriented AKP propelled Turkey to an economic boom. It is the same party which has opened negotiations for Turkeys membership in EU. As far as India is concerned if Islam was so destructive than Muslims would not have been able to rule India for 1000 years and would not have made a mighty dynasty such as Mughal Dynasty. I would simply sumarise your state: "Angoor Khatein hain"
Maoists believe in communist ruler of China . India requires to review its policies in a very diplomatic way .... After PAK , Bangladesh ,,, Nepal policies may take u turn
RE:RE:?
by tamil on May 28, 2008 11:54 PM Permalink
sure with this change Nepal will be soon competing with India... really a gr8 day for Nepal.. free from the clutches of stupid mad useless kings
RE:?
by N.P.Sharma on May 28, 2008 11:56 PM Permalink
BUT moists are no more good ... it further adds to great concerns when they will lead fist Govt ... in critical stage
