Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 320 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
:-)
by LaX Ray on Mar 27, 2008 06:26 PM  Permalink 

Branded

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sychopancy in Congress
by Kali Rao on Mar 27, 2008 06:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

We talk of the Gandhi family and thier good doings for India. I really can't comprehend the good Rajiv Gandhi has done to India compared to Sri PV Narasimha Rao who led the country in financial turmoil in early ninties and supported the then finance minister for liberalisation. It was in PV's rule new India was born, new jobs/industries (including IT boom) were created.

To date no Congress or any other senior politican acknowledges this. There is no respect or rememberance to PV. The things in his own state AP are pathetic. The Chief minister names every thing on either India or Rajiv to please his madam.

This is the state of New India!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Sychopancy in Congress
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:27 PM  Permalink
Kali. Dont bring out these true facts. The Congi's and their courtiers beleive only the Nehru family is responsible for all development. you will be labelled as a Sanghi for your statements. LOL

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Sychopancy in Congress
by Nostra Damus on Mar 27, 2008 07:09 PM  Permalink
absolutely true. Narasimha Rao was the only intelligent PM India had and thereby benefitted, his Look EAst Policy (nowadays called the Congress's policy carefully keeping Rao's name out), his freeing of the Economy (manmohan singh shamelessly taking on the credit after stabbing Rao in the back), forging closer relations with Israel and USA,his only drawback was his inability to protect the Babri Masjid because he wrongly beleived the BJP to be a party of gentlemen.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
this
by Nilesh Kulkarni on Mar 27, 2008 06:13 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

this guy is dressing like his father rajiv gandhi.

actually he is a muslim. his family is also muslim.

dont vote for him and get cheated

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:this
by someone on Mar 27, 2008 06:32 PM  Permalink
Agree with U 100%:
Indira accepted Islam to marry Feroze Khan, son of Nawab Khan. Then Mohammed Gandhi manipulated this, asked Feroze to take the Gandhi lastname to fool desis. Rajiv accepted Christianity, became Robert to marry Antonia (name changed to Sonia) Maino. This is the reason why Priyanks's hubby had to accept Christianity to marry Priyanka. BTW Rahul and Priyanka are both Chrstians, but in public they fool desis as saying they are Hindus. Same thing Gandhi always loved Muslims hated Hindus, created Pak to please British. These are the sick stories of the Gandhi/Nehru family. How long these people will keep fooling the unfortunate desis....


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:this
by Nostra Damus on Mar 27, 2008 07:12 PM  Permalink
the same tricky way, rajshekar reddy and other xtians in the south use Hindu names !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:this
by Pop Head on Mar 27, 2008 06:25 PM  Permalink
If that was so, why was Rajiv Gandhi cremetated in full Hindu rights. A muslim will never permit this. If you like to believe Sanghi propaganda, you are welcome to

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:this
by LaX Ray on Mar 27, 2008 06:28 PM  Permalink
!!!! defying history and facts

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:this
by Nostra Damus on Mar 27, 2008 07:11 PM  Permalink
Pop Head - the same way that muslims have no problem in acting in films, showing skin in films, becoming music composers even though all of these are banned in islam. So for personal interests you can get creameted in full hindu rights as that will attract hindu votes !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:this
by Quacker Oats on Mar 27, 2008 11:32 PM  Permalink
He is a Brahmin & a true secular Indian !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt.
by Pappu on Mar 27, 2008 06:09 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies



1) how many people killed in 1947 partition of india, = 10 million died during the partition

2) Officials say more than 42,000 people have been killed in Kashmir since a revolt against Indian rule erupted in 1989. But human rights groups put the toll at about 60,000.

3) 1984's RIOT in delhi = more then 5000 people were killed

4) In India%u2019s Northeast = 1980 in which about 1076 Bengalis and 278 tribals were killed. one moth ago 28 people killed, then 12, then 8, still contuuuuu

5) BY MNS worker = 8 people still contuuu

STILL PEOPLE WANTS TO VOTE FOR CONGRESSS? THEN YOU ARE NOT AN INDIAN.....


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt.
by Ajay Deshpande! on Mar 27, 2008 06:18 PM  Permalink
Correction: ONe million people died during partition of India and not 10 Millions.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt.
by someone on Mar 27, 2008 06:35 PM  Permalink
Please don't say Congress, call them NoProgress party.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Mar 27, 2008 06:17 PM  Permalink
The hindutvas have killed more than all put together .Yet they call themselves as Indian.These fellows are worse than foreigners who came from somewhere else.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Surname helps!!!!!!!!!!!
by Makarand Pundalik on Mar 27, 2008 06:05 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It has helped ur last couple of generations and will help your next seven, don't worry!!!!!!!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Surname helps!!!!!!!!!!!
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Mar 27, 2008 06:18 PM  Permalink
It is not going to help our Mody. So we worry!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Surname helps!!!!!!!!!!!
by Pop Head on Mar 27, 2008 06:22 PM  Permalink
So that's the worry of the BJP. They need to neutralize Rahul's advantage so they attack his heritage citing sources whose work is not recognized. That's not peculiar for a party for admires Nazis. So borrowing Nazi communication strategies come natural to them

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Surname helps!!!!!!!!!!!
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:28 PM  Permalink
HA HA HA. Congi's under the same banner answering to their own postings.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by lavanya on Mar 27, 2008 06:05 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

jawahrlal nehru, indira gandhi, sanjay gandhi, rajiv gandhi, maneka gandhi, sonia gandhi, rahul gandhi, priyanka gandhi.

pandit jawaharlal motilal nehru(no relation with mahatma gandhi), indira feroz shah(married to muslim feroz), sanjay feroz shah, rajiv feroz shah, maneka sanjay shah, sonia rajiv shah(sonaria from italy), raul rajiv shah, priyanka vadhara.

why this nehru family making fool to people from rural and backward areas of country wo are emotionaly attached with the name of mahatma gandhi, this nehrus and shah will always stand for the election from shuch areas where people give them vote because of belive that this all from mahatma gandhijis family, always stand from bellari and other backward and poor parts of india and making use of surname gandhiji.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by Pappu on Mar 27, 2008 06:07 PM  Permalink
Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt.

1) how many people killed in 1947 partition of india, = 10 million died during the partition

2) Officials say more than 42,000 people have been killed in Kashmir since a revolt against Indian rule erupted in 1989. But human rights groups put the toll at about 60,000.

3) 1984's RIOT in delhi = more then 5000 people were killed

4) In India%u2019s Northeast = 1980 in which about 1076 Bengalis and 278 tribals were killed. one moth ago 28 people killed, then 12, then 8, still contuuuuu

5) BY MNS worker = 8 people still contuuu

STILL PEOPLE WANTS TO VOTE FOR CONGRESSS? THEN YOU ARE NOT AN INDIAN.....


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by Professor DeenDayal on Mar 27, 2008 06:11 PM  Permalink
10 million killed during partition, wow this is the new world record, surpassing the jewish holocaust by hitler..

Everyday i learn new stuff in this forum...
Thanks pappu it was really enlightening,

But theres something missing here, recent years actaully , Gujrat I think....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by Pop Head on Mar 27, 2008 06:17 PM  Permalink
Dayal. These are paid employees of BJP who types whatever the party hands them. Not only they exaggerate figures (as in partition) but their data is also extremely selective (leave out Gujurat).The figures include periods where Congress was out of power

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by LOL on Mar 27, 2008 06:13 PM  Permalink
Solid strong facts.. Thanks for letting everyone know about the surname mystery and misuse of Gandhi's name by the Nehru's family over the years.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Mar 27, 2008 06:20 PM  Permalink
Nehru family is not misusing family name like hindutvas are misusing Ram name.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Some fooling personalities and some hidden names
by sachin kulkarni on Mar 28, 2008 02:07 AM  Permalink
But your'e misusing your name even being a Hindu your actions are Anti-Hindu.You bl...dy typical bangali hipocrite!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Rahul if u r son of ur father (ie Rajiv) then get Davood, tiger, maulana Azhar & Javed miandad
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Mar 27, 2008 06:21 PM  Permalink
Modi has murdered lakhs of indians including hindus. How will normal hindus accept him?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Rahul if u r son of ur father (ie Rajiv) then get Davood, tiger, maulana Azhar & Javed miandad
by sachin kulkarni on Mar 28, 2008 02:09 AM  Permalink
He Should have killed you first you bl...dy hipocrite bangali!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Rahul if u r son of ur father (ie Rajiv) then get Davood, tiger, maulana Azhar & Javed miandad
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:24 PM  Permalink
Lakhs...........LOL. Do you mean for the past years together he had no other job other killing people. Why dont morons accept his victory with grace.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Rahul if u r son of ur father (ie Rajiv) then get Davood, tiger, maulana Azhar & Javed miandad
by LaX Ray on Mar 27, 2008 06:35 PM  Permalink
simple, because they are morons, your question has the answer hidden :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Rahul if u r son of ur father (ie Rajiv) then get Davood, tiger, maulana Azhar & Javed miandad
by Professor DeenDayal on Mar 27, 2008 06:12 PM  Permalink
Mr Dhiren if you are so concerned, why dont you join the army,

I heard our army need more jawans & maybe u can help

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Rahul if u r son of ur father (ie Rajiv) then get Davood, tiger, maulana Azhar & Javed miandad
by someone on Mar 27, 2008 06:58 PM  Permalink
My Friend Dhiren,
I have a request to my all Hindi and Dakshin brothers. Madna our spineless PM is called Dhamna. Please accept this new word into your vocabulary, as it is a Bangla (maybe Pali) word.
In Bangla it means a male who is Useless/ Worthless i.e Impotent. Also it adds the impression of stupidity. This Dhamna in 9/2006 told Musharaf "U also R a victim of terrorism". And he is ruling India as a PM, what a shame for us....
We need Modiji as PM. Modiji can work well with Arun Jaitley, it wud be Great for India. I lost faith in Advani when he called Zinnah secular.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rahul should be PM soon
by pruodNorth on Mar 27, 2008 06:02 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

if Amitab a actor can be legaly become farmer( as per recent allahabad high court ruling)

Why cannot our rahual baba become PM of great india and rule
After all india is free country where anyone can go anywhere and do what likes

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:06 PM  Permalink
Your Rahul Baba can be a PM or anything else as long he is elected by the people. But this crap about inner party democracy when everything is appointed by the high command in Congress.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Pop Head on Mar 27, 2008 06:13 PM  Permalink
He has been already elected by the people (as a MP). You forget, if it is the High Command (Sonia is also elected by the people as a MP), the case of BJP is even worse. It is the Sangh Parivar (no one who is elected by the people) who decides pointment as who makes all the appointment. They made Yashwant Sinha a laughing stock by repeatedly making him roll back budgets; vetoed Jaswant Singh's apppointment as Foreign Minister, made Advani quit as President of BJP etc

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:19 PM  Permalink
Pop Head why dont you get byour head examined. Everybody in India knows about the inner party democracy in Congress. A block level official from Kanyakumari has to take the Madam's permission even to go to a loo. Dont live in glass houses and throw stones. LOL

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:21 PM  Permalink
I have to agree even the commies who I feel are worse than the Congi's have a better inner party democracy or for that matter the family owned DMK in TN.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by democrat on Mar 27, 2008 06:07 PM  Permalink
Only that Rahul comes into way of the Sanghis who also want to grab the PM's chair? Since they have nothing positive to offer, they resort to negative campaigning

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:11 PM  Permalink
LOL. What happened to Rahul Baba's positive campaigning in UP dear sir.............

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Pop Head on Mar 27, 2008 06:28 PM  Permalink
The harvest will be reaped in 2009 polls

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:33 PM  Permalink
Hopes Hopes. Good. Be positive.But remember you reap what you sow.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by LaX Ray on Mar 27, 2008 06:39 PM  Permalink
no doubt about it, and the great party will blame it again on the poor local partymen. When will they learn to accept the actual culprits for defeats and stop blaming the lower lever committees.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rahul should be PM soon
by Pappu on Mar 27, 2008 06:06 PM  Permalink
rahul eak dam chuity admi hai !!
wo tumri m1aa bhi chud dega agar PM bany gaa to

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt
by Pappu on Mar 27, 2008 06:02 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt.

1) how many people killed in 1947 partition of india, = 10 million died during the partition

2) Officials say more than 42,000 people have been killed in Kashmir since a revolt against Indian rule erupted in 1989. But human rights groups put the toll at about 60,000.

3) 1984's RIOT in delhi = more then 5000 people were killed

4) In India%u2019s Northeast = 1980 in which about 1076 Bengalis and 278 tribals were killed. one moth ago 28 people killed, then 12, then 8, still contuuuuu

5) BY MNS worker = 8 people still contuuu

STILL PEOPLE WANTS TO VOTE FOR CONGRESSS? THEN YOU ARE NOT AN INDIAN.....


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Mar 27, 2008 06:23 PM  Permalink
People like young Rahul better than old old BJP fellows.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt
by Sun on Mar 27, 2008 06:33 PM  Permalink
Well atleast better than the old commie canines,we have to agree.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Maximum No of people kill during congress Govt
by sachin kulkarni on Mar 28, 2008 02:15 AM  Permalink
People like you are much better better to kill than any other chickens or Fish to eat. You bl...dy hipocrite bangali

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Gandhi surname helps, says Rahul
by BadriPrasad Nagoji on Mar 27, 2008 06:02 PM  Permalink 

There cannot be any better admission of piggyriding. There are umpteen number of people without surname who have served the country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 320 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message