Indians have survived for the last 3,500 years. Only now, after more than a decade of globalisation, Indians, the real original Indians seem to atleast Want to live. Indians are rising. So is India. A day will come, when the past glory of Indus Valley civilisation, from which the very term Industry was derived, will come back to India. All invaders and oppressors will meet their fates soon.
RE:Indians
by Sahadevan KK on Mar 28, 2008 10:15 AM Permalink
And if we comrades can help it, we will ensure that India does not survive for more than another 10 years. China ki jai!
RE:RE:Indians
by Manjula A on Mar 29, 2008 11:45 AM Permalink
If Aryans like this KK Sahadevan have their way, anything can happen, including the destruction of all things Indian, but it won't because the Indians are rising.
RE:Indians
by Pyare Mohan on Mar 28, 2008 10:25 PM Permalink
Majula ben.. did you even read the article? Ok. one primer for your call-center trained tiny brain - Bharat has a written history of more than 10000 years. So first get rid of that 3500 years from your head. Your decade of globalization will not even be mentioned in the history of Bharat because 10 years is such a small unit of time. So if you can not see beyond your call-center window, its not your fault, but the world outside is much bigger than call center.
RE:Indians
by Manjula A on Mar 29, 2008 11:40 AM Permalink
10 years may be small but have been very important. Didn't you see how people of Khairlonji hit back at the Aryans? Didn't you see, how the tribal girl in Assam, despite all humilition, continues her work? That is called liberation of India. And Hind Desh has a written history, very true. Please read it. Don't call mythology history, like some stupid Christians do. Behave like a proper Hindu if you are one.
RE:RE:Indians
by Manjula A on Mar 29, 2008 11:42 AM Permalink
Mr. Pyare Mohan, if you work for a call centre, don't think every body does. True that Bapuji asked us to treat everyone as yourself but he didn't ask you to treat everyone to be as stupid as yourself.
RE:Good!
by Krishnan Hariharan on Mar 28, 2008 06:58 AM Permalink
its not mumbo jumbo ... in general terms a society should serve the following purpose
- enable good people to live happily (as opposed to pleasurably) - enable the holy ones to excel in virtues and propagage sublime, divine ideologies - enable the offended to get Justice in a timely fashion - diligently root out opposition within itself to ideals that it strives for - protect at all costs the flowers of the garden which make the garden fragrant and worthy and pluck out the disease causing and damaging weeds
the basis of all this idealism is the concept of the Universal Spirit. If there was no human Spirit and endeavour, i think one can eat and drink and live merrily and die like a dog, no need for a complicated human birth! The greatest civilizations have always promoted Godliness and Spirituality and the worst have ignored Divinity and followed the path of Mammon to destruction! Hindus are really great because they are the true spiritual religion of tolerance and patient acceptance. At the end of Kali Yuga only India would be left, all other islands will be completely destroyed paving a way to a new Satya Yuga. This theory is correct even from the Yin/Yang theory of the Chinese which is nevertheless borrowed from the great Sankhya theory of Kapila!
Never forget the concept of Avatar which is unique to Hinduism. The wrath of God will lead us into permanent perdition and endanger the soul. The body which all people in the wide world consider as "all that is there" is bound
RE:communists & their loayalties
by Demo-crazy on Mar 29, 2008 12:14 AM Permalink
Don't you call such people traitors? What is the punishment for a traitor?
RE:Tibetan independence under capitalism is a pipedream
by Sahadevan KK on Mar 28, 2008 11:35 AM Permalink
We comrades scream about "imperialism" as a diversionary tactic. We know that China is a Nazi-like imperial power. But our handlers tell us what to say.
RE:RE:Tibetan independence under capitalism is a pipedream
by Demo-crazy on Mar 29, 2008 12:15 AM Permalink
Are you the real loyal commie KK Sahadevan? These posts are so unlike the KKS we know of!
RE:RE:Tibetan independence under capitalism is a pipedream
by userwas userwas on Mar 27, 2008 06:49 AM Permalink
Don't look using pipes...Start looking without any pipes and you can see much broader...and tell this to your fellow pinkos...
RE:Tibetan independence under capitalism is a pipedream
by Krishnan Hariharan on Mar 28, 2008 07:07 AM Permalink
a communist bengali is what the indian subcontinent should shudder about... pity that the land the produced most fragrant flowers like Paramahamsa, Yogananda, Vivekananda, Vidyasagar , Aurobindo and the great Sri Krishna Chaitanya is also producing these poisonous fruits called "communist (s)intellectuals" who are tormenting the Indian government from taking any good decision for the benefit of the country. i think karma is too great for india to achieve anything in this world.
RE:Hindu Response to Totalitarian Barbarians has always been weak kneed
by Manjula A on Mar 27, 2008 11:28 AM Permalink
That is because there was never a Hindu civilisation as you say. First there was the Indus Valley civilisation and then there were numerous invasions and oppresion of Indians. Always. Indus Valley people were most definitely Shaivite Hindus but that religion was almost destroyed by the Aryans before bein accepted and it was the sheer force of the faith in Lord Shiva that has kept the religion alive.
RE:Hindu Response to Totalitarian Barbarians has always been weak kneed
by Krishnan Hariharan on Mar 28, 2008 07:12 AM Permalink
yes that is straight out of the history books which were written painstakingly by Englishmen who wanted to destroy the self respect of the greatest civilization in the world, by splitting india into Aryans and Dravidians they have achieved what they wanted! A Manjula from remote village can now blame the Aryans for all the problems she has with her intestines!
RE:Hindu Response to Totalitarian Barbarians has always been weak kneed
by hindu on Apr 01, 2008 08:49 AM Permalink
Oh once again the convent educated, who thinks "the discovery of India" by nehru is the last word in Indian history. Lord Shiva will not tolerate dumb statments from you. He may open his third eye and burn you. You dumbo
RE:Hindu Response to Totalitarian Barbarians has always been weak kneed
by Vishnu Sharma on Mar 31, 2008 10:46 PM Permalink
Leave this Aryan nonsense. It is irritating to the ears !
Chinese people cant be blamed!!!China ruled by thuggish communists with an iron hand!!! They didnt spare their own people(remember tiananmen)!!! Will they spare poor Tibetans???
RE:Modi should be prime minister.
by Pradip Parekh on Mar 27, 2008 06:06 AM Permalink
all wisdom must boil down currently to what you have said. it makes little sense to be rehashing history over and over and yet not make a move toward the obvious choice that is the one and only narendra modi. you can't change history but you can shape the future.
Partition of India, Tibet occupation by China, Refusal to take UNSC seat etc the blunders done by Mr Nehru and others.Why Mr Vajpaye did not raise voice in Parliament at that time? Any way, why Mr M.k.Narayan 'after many round of discussions with Chineese' could not understand them and their claim for Arunachal etc? Such a beautiful place like Arunachal completely left out for development? The current foreign secretary has studied some subjects like History etc to get IFS. How can we expect such people to conceive Nuclear and other scientific decision making. We have many intelligent people but who take decision are ordinaries. Why NDA govt kept silent on border preparedness with China esp. the George Fernades? We need to improve quickly and put fast activities to overcome the losses.Even now many want Nuke deal to go, like the UNSC seat it will be. To become a great nation, we should not loose a single internatonal opportunity and should be a major economic and defence power.
RE:India and China
by Sacha Hindustani on Mar 26, 2008 03:58 PM Permalink
Have heard the same things about Nehru time and Time again, and I believe it that Nehru was nothing more then an Ideot in its real sence. A headless chicken!!! He is unfortunately not only the first prime minister of India by the first prime azzwhole who thought himself to be a king of the world. We needed people like sardar patel or in this case even Modi.... im sure india wud have been in a better position.
