RE:Cases are decided by media these days
by Sudip Bhattacharjee on Mar 24, 2008 11:11 PM Permalink
Media is the mouth of common public. If the common people have a right to say something, so does the media. They can criticize anything in a well democratic process.
Justice is not about revenge. Eye for an eye and a like for a life. We are not in Saudi arabia and thank God for it.
Shram committed a serious crime. But it was out of desperation. Remember Shivani was sleeping with him and pregnant with his baby. She was not an innocent baby. Doent mean that she should have been killed or that she deserved to die but this is not one of those rarest of rare cases deserving death penalty
RE:Justice is not about revenge
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 11:28 PM Permalink
In saudi, justice is not given against the sheiks. It is reserved for Dravid's like True Indians and also to Aryans who took on Dravid religion ie. Hinduism.
RE:Justice is not about revenge
by Sudip Bhattacharjee on Mar 24, 2008 08:47 PM Permalink
Justice is not about revenge, it is about paying your dues to the society in which you committed the crime. If you commit a crime, you must pay and that payment depends upon the gravity of the crime. That is the way civilized society works. You may disagree whether he should be given a death penalty or not. In my opinion, if you take someone's life, you do not deserve to have yours.
RE:Justice is not about revenge
by sanchita datta on Mar 24, 2008 09:53 PM Permalink
I agree.This was truly a case of a LIFE FOR A LIFE.Shivani may not have been an innocent babe...does that make Sharma one?He was a govt.servant in a responsible position,married(supposedly happily)with two kids.India is not Saudi A ,but sometimes the justice system really needs to take a wake up call and punish the guilty rightfully.
RE:death penalty should be abolished
by Bird on Mar 24, 2008 08:40 PM Permalink
let one of your near and dear ones get raped and killed.. you will then ask for Captial punishment.
RE:RE:death penalty should be abolished
by Sudip Bhattacharjee on Mar 24, 2008 08:50 PM Permalink
Well said. We often forget the hardship, agony and pain of the relatives who did not deserve this treatment. Death sentence should be mandatory for first degree murder. If you do not give death sentence for first degree murder, then abolish it. The judge seems to have ignored the pain he inflicted to the victim as well as to the family of the victim and that is a gross mistake in his judgment.
RE:death penalty should be abolished
by sachin gurjur on Mar 24, 2008 08:47 PM Permalink
but what if one is really innocent,though he cannot prove becoz he cannot afford a suitable lawyer to fight his case?
This should be the classic case of death penalty. But what did the judge say?...
R K Sharma has an excellent service record as a police officer and extreme penalty is not needed in this case
- what the .... is the judge saying? Is this the way the Indian justice system works? He deserves death penalty and the judge made a huge mistake of not giving him. Past record of a person has nothing to do with first degree murder. He did not think about the relatives of the victims. They should appeal against the judgment immediately to higher court for the death penalty. I think in India we put undue sympathy to the criminal than what the victim deserves. Also remember that he will be eligible for parole after 14 years. So, I think, this is the height of stupidity of the Indian judicial system.
RE:Should be the classic case of death penalty
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 07:14 PM Permalink
It is hurting so many people out here. Seems like he should have not given himself to the justice system. Do you think he needs some specialized training from "drug syndicate" to be a professional criminal.
This should be the classic case of death penalty. But what did the judge say?...
R K Sharma has an excellent service record as a police officer and extreme penalty is not needed in this case
- what the **** is the judge saying? Is this the way the Indian justice system works? He deserves death penalty and the judge made a huge mistake of not giving him. Past record of a person has nothing to do with first degree murder. He did not think about the relatives of the victims. They should appeal against the judgment immediately to higher court for the death penalty. I think in India we put undue sympathy to the criminal than what the victim deserves. Also remember that he will be eligible for parole after 14 years. So, I think, this is the height of stupidity of the Indian judicial system.
Even Advani meets sonia gandhi at Holi so he gains prominence and appears as sole opposition leader... Keeping all the rhetorics aside. Opposition is hand in glove and they know who needs to be tried, what case need to be tried for showoff and who needs to be left out. Just a joke : Advani went with his wife, Atal cannot compete with him unless he has a girlfriend to go with him.
It is shsocking to see some people even support RKS in this forum. I feel, he shoudl have been given maximum punishment considering the oath he sworn in to protect public. I am sure a common man in his position would have been handed capital punishment.
RE:Hi
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:27 PM Permalink
what's your real name? Go to Afganistan and do justice out there. They also have post of CJ vacant in Pakistan. Justice is ONLY for GOOD PEOPLE. YOU CAN NEVER TRY HITLER'S OF THE WORLD.
RE:Hi
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:38 PM Permalink
I don't live in India and when I lived in India, lived like a honest person. 40 years ago, stayed few miles away from "such" women.
But India has not MUCH to offer for honesty in return. Even survival is difficult at times for honest people.
RE:Hi
by Rajesh Kumar on Mar 24, 2008 06:34 PM Permalink
Yes indeed Shahul. It is really shocking to see some ashamed people here supporting sharma openly inspite of his criminal deeds. And this idiot DS is really talking crap. He doesn't seem to understand indian judiciary or anything at all.
RE:RE:Hi
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:40 PM Permalink
I don't live in India and when I lived in India, lived like a honest person. 40 years ago, stayed few miles away from "such" women.
But India has not MUCH to offer for honesty in return. Even survival is difficult at times for honest people.
gO TRY SONIA FOR BOFORS AND HER SON for rape in Boston to have your behind kicked from top.
RE:Hi
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:41 PM Permalink
I don't live in India and when I lived in India, lived like a honest person. 40 years ago, stayed few miles away from "such" women.
But India has not MUCH to offer for honesty in return. Even survival is difficult at times for honest people.
gO TRY SONIA FOR BOFORS AND HER SON for rape in Boston to have your behind kicked from top.
RE:Hi
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:46 PM Permalink
Even Advani meets sonia gandhi so he gains prominence and appears as sole opposition leader... Opposition is hand in glove and they know who needs to be tried and who needs to be left.
That is why I am retired and live in Florida and enjoy my time at beach, internet and beautiful bikini women who don't blackmail me and I don't care if they do. It is just beautiful in Miami right now.
RE:Mambai : Bhauu khaaye bhooltoo rheey
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:22 PM Permalink
I always tell "sharma', "vermas" and so on...India mheey maaza naaheey rheey... baahut bhikaareey hein vaaha phaar.
RE:Mambai : Bhauu khaaye bhooltoo rheey
by sanchita datta on Mar 24, 2008 10:26 PM Permalink
AND U R THE BIGGEST BHIKHARI OF THE LOT.BEGGING IN U.S NOW.I THINK I SAW U BEGGING LAST TIME I WENT TO MIAMI.DINT I GIVE U 50 CENTS?HOPE IT HELPED.SICKHEAD.
Nope, with so much of smartness, He should have have leaked information to drug syndicate and fetched few crores for himself and also asked them to keep Shivani Bhatnagar happy.
BUT HE sharma is NOT A PROFESSIONAL CRIMINAL AFTERALL. otherwise he would do quite well in India.
I KNOW MANY INDIANS ARE VERY PREJUDICED AGAINST HIS LAST NAME.
RE:RE:Expected a more sever sentence
by D S on Mar 24, 2008 06:10 PM Permalink
new I am NRI, i know how all these big Industrial houses know information in advance and those who provide them that inside details on telecom, oil and many more information are KEPT ALWAYS SAFE and their lavish life protected. RK is NO PROFESSIONAL CRIMINAL or con/slick person, otherwise he will do quite well in India.
