Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 256 messages Pages    <<  < Newer 
Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by most intimate on Mar 23, 2008 09:20 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is time for India to correct the historic blunder it has made in accepting Dalai Lama as the Tibaten leader(instead of on purely humanitarian grounds) and inviting the hostility of a valuable neighbour. Had china been intervened in the same manner in Kashmir,..etc how India would have felt? It is heartening to note that in the recent past the Indian rulers have started realising this and word their responces more cautiously on Tibaten issue. Still there seems to be some hide and seek..what prevents the formation of the TriNation unity, which would have been the strongest and closest alliance in the world otherwise- The alliance of India Russia and China as a global power..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by Karan on Mar 23, 2008 09:28 PM  Permalink
Are you one of those ignorant fools who just came out of the well? What has China been doing for years in Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh? It's a shame India did not condemn whatever happened in Tibet.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by aditya kumar on Mar 23, 2008 09:24 PM  Permalink
What was the purpose of China's taking over Tibet?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by Bathla Gundu on Mar 23, 2008 09:31 PM  Permalink
Yeah right in your dreams. You want India to join rogue nations like China and Russia to form a global power. For your information, neither Russia nor China recognise India as a nuclear power leave alone treat India as equals to join the UNSC. The only countries that have recognised India as a major and nuclear power is UK and France and support UNSC membership. 3 out of the 5 permanent UNSC members do not recognise India as a military power but only want India for its huge domestic market. But given the history of USA's support of India during India-China 1962 war, India should be closer to the west and not join an alliance with the losing side again (like India did with USSR). USA also has the power to restrain Pakistan, India's second enemy. It is a matter of time before the Red Empire reduces to the size within the great wall of China Proper. Russia is balkanising just like the Chinese Red Empire.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by manoj nair on Mar 23, 2008 09:49 PM  Permalink
Are you talking about the same US which send their aircraft carriers to the Indian ocean during the Ino-pak war of 71? If it wasnt for the Russian ships armed with nuclear missiles following the US ships the 71 war would have yielded totally a different result... so i would really wont trust US on that for any reason...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by avtar priyadarshan on Mar 23, 2008 09:51 PM  Permalink
Nehru's idea of common man and socialism screwd us. Do we know when India went through a famine, Rice and Wheat came from USA....and we always kissed Russias butt..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by most intimate on Mar 23, 2008 09:56 PM  Permalink
Please do not speard informations on which you are not sure....India was never on the charity of US, though there were organizations linked to United Nations to support India in times of famine. India has also a stake in United Nations, and for the information of US Loyalists, US is the country which has the maximum unpaid debts to United States, and forcing it to bankrupsy. Even the arms of United Nations like NATO are being used by US for its selfish interests , as we have seen in Iraq and Afgan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by most intimate on Mar 23, 2008 09:51 PM  Permalink
I just cannot understand what is the great stuff in recognition as a Nuclear Power..Will it give food to the teaming millions of the Nation? will it stop the curses of Terrorism, or will it only help the booming weapon market, to aid US? Gone are the days of Militory mussle power. To my knowledge, an enemy nearby can prove more useful than a friend(?) far away. That too, a country like US, which is the only country in the world which shamelessly excersised nuclear power on millions of human beings , is far from a good allay for India. Have you ever dreamt that if US was left alone with its imperial terrorism in a Unipolar world, whether countries , including India could sustain retaining its cultural and ecornomic identity, as it is there now, had USSR not been there in the world? Going by power is the philosophy for cowards, not for a Nation like India

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Tibet- Historical blunder of an unwanted intervention
by Bathla Gundu on Mar 23, 2008 10:16 PM  Permalink
It does not give food, but having a nuclear weapon and a right doctrine will make the enemy think a 100 times before attacking India in any forum. USSR had to support India because Nehru allied with it. What did the same USSR do during the India-China war? Nothing. USA came to our rescue. But the Chinese were shrewd and unilaterally declared ceasefire before US could bomb them.. Go to China and ask the Chinese people (highly educated and well-off) why they leave China even after a booming economy. You will find answers. Food alone does not maketh a man, lest we become animals.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
I hate India
by avtar priyadarshan on Mar 23, 2008 09:19 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Didnt feel like reading the whole article. It was so well understood that we dont have bones.....Chine rules India and India is goddamn scared.congress and the lefts will sell india someday and there will be no sign of repentence on their faces. This is what we have got in Legacy. I swear we need a person like Hitler todayu who fought for German Pride. As far as we are concerned , Pride is something that was sold long ago.........I hate my country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:I hate India
by King of Kings on Mar 23, 2008 09:38 PM  Permalink
Hate does not suit for an AVTAR

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:I hate India
by avtar priyadarshan on Mar 23, 2008 09:48 PM  Permalink
Shastry, Aditya and King.......I believe this country survives for only good people like u.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:I hate India
by avtar priyadarshan on Mar 23, 2008 09:49 PM  Permalink
Thnx from the core of my heart...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:I hate India
by Sastry on Mar 23, 2008 09:23 PM  Permalink
I share your opinion and this was i debated in the CDS (defence) exam more than 15 years ago. Ofcourse I was not selected as they might not have wanted a person who was an ardent supporter of military rule/ dictatorship in their ranks. May be there were other reasons also. But ponder about what "ACTION" we have taken what "SACRIFICE" we made to alter the situation. But still I am with you and share your opinion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:I hate India
by kedem kemorah on Mar 24, 2008 12:23 AM  Permalink
Well said. Indians are very poor at politics & that is why we fail to score at every international fora whenever India's interests are involved. Pakistanis are far better at it, leave alone China. Our politicians are only good at scoring brownie points against each other within India. The moment they step outside the country, they make a fool of themselves, whether it is the Shimla Agreement or the Agra Summit.Why can't we clearly state that what is happening in Tibet is gross infringement of Human Rights by a totalitarian regime? China keeps harping on this to keep us out. It does not compare with Kashmir as it has always been a part of India before the Muslims came to India and made their religion the sole arbiter for seperating the original people of India. The Partition is incomplete without 100 percent population exchange. The same is not the case with Tibet which the expansionist and imperialist China has suo moto annexed. If Tibet was an integral part of China as the Chinese claim, then why resettle the plains Han Chinese in Tibet for upsetting the demographics by making the Tibetans a minority? Obviously, like the Xingian regions of the extreme West which is dominated by the non-Chinese Uighurs, Tibetan culture is far removed from the post-Mao Chinese one. After the Evil Empire had broken up in the 1990s, the biggest menace the world faces today is the Yellow Peril. The rest of world in general and India in particular will ignore this latest danger at its own peril !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:I hate India
by aditya kumar on Mar 23, 2008 09:27 PM  Permalink
Avtar,
Don't hate ur country so much, do something about it, watever little it maybe. Little by little, we'll one day be able to voice our opinion in a effective way.

Jai Hind!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 256 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer 
Write a message