USA has again clarified that their local Hyde act will be applicable the agreement. Earlier also they had said so. But MMS, Pranab Mukherjee etc were shouting even till yesterday that Hyde act is not applicable to us.
RE:Hyde act and the Central Govt
by Ram Sharma on Mar 04, 2008 09:50 PM Permalink
i forgot to add the name of sonia, who had said that anyone oppising the deal is anti-national.
RE:Hyde act and the Central Govt
by Pradip Parekh on Mar 05, 2008 03:00 AM Permalink
right. congress has been misleading the hindus on nearly all issues. it takes usa to expose congressi scams: saddam's bribe money, arrest of raul gandhi at the airport, and now the nuke deal.it will take usa to unravel quatrochi guy to in its own way.
India's foreign policy is controlled by the Commmunist goons. And they are getting enough and more attention in the media. Who oppose the deal? Answer is very simple COMMUNISTS. It has nothing to to Hyde acts. IT HAS SOME THING TO WITH HATE TOWARDS THE US. THESE SOBs ARE LIVING IN COLD WAR ERA. WHO GAINS? NOT THE PEOPLE OF INDIA. THIS HELPS CHINA AND PAKISTAN. THEY ARE LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK.
RE:Who control the India's foreign policy?
by JGN on Mar 04, 2008 09:34 PM Permalink
Mr. Raj, people like you are good for anything other than ridiculing the Communists? Do you think that India is a State of USA to abide by their domestic laws?
Do you know that the same USA has threatened us by moving their Seventh Fleet to Bay of Bengal during 1971 war with West Pakistan? It was the timely action of Egypt (by closing Suez Canal) that prevented US from taking part is the war during 1971. US (or any country for that matter) have no permanent enemies. They only have permanent interests. That is the basic principle of diplomacy! History will repeat itself as a farce if we do not learn from past mistakes.
RE:RE:Who control the India's foreign policy?
by Harimau Iyer on Mar 05, 2008 08:41 AM Permalink
"Do you know that the same USA has threatened us by moving their Seventh Fleet to Bay of Bengal during 1971 war with West Pakistan? It was the timely action of Egypt (by closing Suez Canal) that prevented US from taking part is the war during 1971. US (or any country for that matter) have no permanent enemies. They only have permanent interests. That is the basic principle of diplomacy!"
After saying nations don't have permanent snsmiss, only permanent interests, you are quoting the 1971 incident to suggest that India should maintain permanent enmity with the US.
If you cannot construct two sentences in a row with consistent logic, you should not be allowed out on your own, let alone be posting on issues.
RE:RE:Who control the India's foreign policy?
by Harimau Iyer on Mar 05, 2008 08:45 AM Permalink
"Do you know that the same USA has threatened us by moving their Seventh Fleet to Bay of Bengal during 1971 war with West Pakistan? It was the timely action of Egypt (by closing Suez Canal) that prevented US from taking part is the war during 1971. US (or any country for that matter) have no permanent enemies. They only have permanent interests. That is the basic principle of diplomacy!"
After quoting the 1971 Bay of Bengal incident with the 7th Fleet in support of permanent enmity between India and the US, you say that nations have only permanent interests, not permanent enemies.
If you cannot construct three sentences in a row without contradictions, you should not be posting on international issues.
RE:Who control the India's foreign policy?
by Raman Krishnan on Mar 04, 2008 10:38 PM Permalink
The question here is where does the commie's loyalties lie? India or the republic of china. Based on their statements, you would strongly consider the latter.
India is not a province of US! How can they say that we adhere to the rules of their land!
This is like colonial spain and portugese coming to Japan and saying that Japan belongs to them because they have enacted a law in their country that says so..
RE:India is not Texas!
by JGN on Mar 04, 2008 09:30 PM Permalink
Mr. Shiva, you are right. Even I was also thinking the same while reading the article.
RE:India is not Texas!
by Harimau Iyer on Mar 05, 2008 08:48 AM Permalink
You are right, India is not Texas.
India is like an impotent man with AIDS. The US is willing to give Viagra to India but wants India to use a condom. India is claiming that is infringing on its fundamental right.
Well, there is no fundamental right to Viagra. Or, nuclear fuel and equipment.
RE:India is not Texas!
by Hebbar R on Mar 04, 2008 08:03 PM Permalink
The US can say what they want. But, the issue is how the Govt of India, especially MMS and Sonia Gandhi and the Congress, are trying to fool the people and trying to agree to the diktats of the US and there by undermining the independence of India.
By this statement from the US Official, one has to look at the credibility of the statement that the PM and some of his senior ministerial colleagues (from Congress) have been telling even the Parliament.
It is to be seen what the Congress will get by hiding the Hyde Act, when USA itself opens it up. It has to gain a lot from the nuclear agreement than India. Even then it says that HA will rule and will a definite say in all these. What Congress will get in hiding the HA, it is to be seen. May be some congress men offered some important positions in the world bodies by the USA or otherwise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I fail to understand that if India is on the receiving end in Nuclear Deal and if US is doing a favour by signing it then why is it that US authorities seems to be more eager, anxious in getting it materialised and why their leaders are visiting India and talking to our leaders than vice versa? The matter is not straight forward.US must have some hidden and long term intentions, strategies behind signing the deal. Congress should take a mandate over the issue and than sign the deal or the Govt. must be pulled down if is insists.
