Neerja Chowdhury should be shameful, she she keep writing about communist and China. Don't you eat India food like us? Why do you giving excuse that going to make China happy.
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Indian Indian on Jul 01, 2008 12:10 AM Permalink
What is it in this article which makes you unhappy ? She's talking about an incapable, puppet PM. She's rightly asking to be decisive and take the paralysed govt. out of limbo, It is a beautifuly put up article. In 4 years of this govt. do you know or can you tell if Manmohan Singh took 1 single decision ??
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Gurpreet Singh on Jul 01, 2008 01:30 AM Permalink
Being travelling a lot around the world,I can say one thing,that PM's vision has brought India on top.People around the world recognise him as a Intelligent Economist,though he is not a shrewd politician...He brought globalisation in India when he was Finance Minister....Today you land anywhere in the world ,you will see people talking about growth in India......they talk about India's Growth.....lots of countries depend on India to get their jobs done in various sectors....AND we INDIANS should be proud of it.No one is perfect in this world and everyone should realize its very difficult to work in Coalation Govt. where you have to satisfy every politiacl party in Coalation.....Everyone should realize,that things are changing in India.....We are doing good in Many sectors:IT,Medicine,Production to name few....AND YES "ROME WAS NOT BUILT IN A DAY"....
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Indian Indian on Jul 01, 2008 02:45 AM Permalink
Tell us 1 thing about Manmohan Singh's vision. What you are seeing today is the momentum brought in by the Vajpayee Govt. It was during Vajpayee's time when Jaswant Singh worked over time on foreign policy and took India to the top of the world. I have been in US for last 15 years. I know how India started showing up in all business journals. It was all during 2000-2004. This govt. is a nill, Nada, Zero....
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Darshan on Jul 01, 2008 02:51 AM Permalink
But it was burnt in a day and that could happen if there are weak leaders like Nero/Dr. Singh..
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Vivek on Jul 01, 2008 12:22 AM Permalink
Read all the articles she has written and you will be able to know here agenda. There is nothing wrong with PM, these China lover are spending lot of China money on PR. All of sudden we are asked to believe that PM is not good. These Chinese agents are playing bad game since long time. We need to bring them to justice and throw them out of India. Many countries have done that and so should we.
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Indian Indian on Jul 01, 2008 12:30 AM Permalink
We are not asked to believe 'PM is not good', we know PM is not good. Manmohan Singh is worst performing PM ever. Again tell me 1, just 1 thing that PM did in last 4 years that makes you feel he is good.
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Vivek on Jul 01, 2008 12:47 AM Permalink
Don't change the focus. Communist are traiter and people like Neerja Chowdhury are their face.
RE:Neerja Chowdhury is bias for China
by Brave Boy on Jul 01, 2008 12:45 AM Permalink
No brother you cannot say that.. He has done one remarkable job i.e Puppet PM. Madam sonia will now project Rahul baba as Next PM. I hope that day will never come.
People must understand that leader of the country should be very bold, courageous and politically correct.
but the questions in this particular context is : does manmohan singh really have the power? if not is he incapable of seizing it? or is he just incapble of wielding it?
NEW DELHI: Already under attack over its handling of Sam Manekshaw's funeral, Manmohini Singh faced questions over Field Marshals being kept out of the warrant of precedence that apparently delayed announcement of a state funeral for the iconic former Army Chief.
Though since 1973, three eminent military personalities - SHFJ Mankeshaw, K M Cariappa, and Arjan Singh - have been upgraded to the post of Marshals, yet the Warrant has not included them. The warrant was updated as late as 2007.
As news of Manekshaws death on Friday broke, it was Defence Minister Antony who spoke to PM Manmohan Singh that the countrys first Field Marshal should be given a State funeral keeping his stature and services to the nation, sources said. Our PM is spending sleepless nights thinking about terrorists like Afzal Guru & their well being has no time for our war heroes who put their lives on the line.
I think this kind of article will have a little impact on the people. It does not lead us to the solution; it only explains the problems better. While that is good, it is also required to have some articles which should show us some light.
I think the print media has a huge role to play at this point. So far they have been just a spectator, only commenting here and there. They have to take a bold stand and express their opinion of what is good or what is bad. Be it in favor of the deal, or against the deal, they should come out clean to the public about their standing. After all, nothing more than the print media can influence the people of a country. In the context of the nuclear deal, the print media has failed to perform its duty.
RE:Role of media
by Seenu Subbu on Jun 30, 2008 11:13 PM Permalink
Nobody has descended straight from heavens to "show light". These are human issues, and the elected leaders are humans too, they have no magic bullets. People who elect these often incompetent maggots, are also humans. You can look at the situation and come up with a solution. If we look around for others to show light and solve our problems, we might as well ask the British to come back and rule India, problem solved.
RE:Role of media
by india on Jun 30, 2008 11:31 PM Permalink
media's job is not to show solution always, I giuess media should be neutral and let the news come from source to mass, and that's what happening here , I am rather glad rediff is writing except cheap report ,anyway people have some power too, they vote and judge, and they better wake up.
RE:Role of media
by Gopal on Jul 01, 2008 12:52 AM Permalink
Mr.Sudeep, How can one say whether the deal is good or bad? MMS keeps the details confidential.!! There lot of objectionable points in the 123 agreement and the Hyde act. It had been debated in many columns in the various media. What about the 'draft of IAEA agreement'? Reading the first two we can anticipate that there is something 'objectionable' in the IAEA-draft. MMS if he wants to prove his own words let him allow the Parliament to debate the draft. (He declared that his govt is all for consensus.) The congress had declared several times that this is not an 'one point' govt. Let them keep 'one oint' N-deal under suspended animation. There are so many other problems to handle for the nation. For the poor millions!!
The views presented are very pleasant. It seems to be quite sincere. But it will find very few takers as it is not one-sided. Such balanced writing and concern for fellow citizens with a question on the performance of the political figures doesn't arouse fire in the youth. Unfortunately people who are active, who work in the public front are people with a certain inclination or background. This is what can be seen starting from college to any further field of life. What President Bush once said is a fact in which all the present generation believe in - "You are either with us or against us". The present writing which strikes at the junction of two differing viewpoint and advocates at conceding to reason rather than emotion at a critical stage of social life should have come more and more in our democratic setup. This one or two such articles a year is not going to make much difference to society. Its a wishful thinking that this kind of writing continues in this paper and other publications in the country . Only then can these make a difference. This is a perfect writing for our democratic setup.
