pheonixland for most of the hindu shrines in medieval ages were given to hindus by muslims including the land GOLDEN TEMPLME&land for maths of shankaracharayas.it is also mulims who distributed land to poors.before they came land used to be in the name of temples
When the First Caliph of Islam Abu Bakr could not give the Land of Fadak to the Mohd's own daughter Fatima(Fadak was gifted to her by Mohd himself during his life time).Forget that Muslim will give any land that too for a Hindu shrine.....
RE:Muslims
by rna on Jun 28, 2008 06:02 PM Permalink
Are u Okay? Which land r u talking abt? Forest land, the only hurdele is of equilibrium if we make some artificial arrangements for commutation in that area...
RE:Muslims
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 10:33 AM Permalink
land for most of the hindu shrines in medieval ages were given to hindus by muslims including the land GOLDEN TEMPLME&land for maths of shankaracharayas.it is also mulims who distributed land to poors.before they came land used to be in the name of temples.
RE:Muslims
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 10:44 AM Permalink
pheonixland for most of the hindu shrines in medieval ages were given to hindus by muslims including the land GOLDEN TEMPLME&land for maths of shankaracharayas.it is also mulims who distributed land to poors.before they came land used to be in the name of temples
RE:Muslims
by Fried Yakov on Jun 28, 2008 06:21 PM Permalink
You are right on spot man. Where are the pseudos who so vehemently protested the demolition of the illegal structure called Babri Masjid? Such height of intolerance amongst the so called Sufis? Then what about the Wahabis? And the rest of the othe rMuslim sects. They surely love and dream of seeing us all Kafirs die. My My!!!!! What tolerance Islam teaches!!!!!!!!
what a waste of life you are living. even the courts have not labelled it as an illegal structure so who the heck are you.
Stop your lies of Islam, and if you have an axe to grind against muslims then go to some sick minded forum where you can meet sick and frustated shit heads like yourself.
RE:Muslims
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
fried yakov babri masjid was 600 yr old mosque it was not an illegal structure gondaas of rss(rumour spreading societ)&fascist shivsena demolished this divide india on instrution of their bosses sitting in new york.
RE:RE:Muslims
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 10:42 AM Permalink
all right gondaas afre called those who break the law.they have broken the supreme court instruction to keep status quo.more they are involve in all the communal riots in india where they kill poor hapless rickshaw pullers&fruit sellers burn alive newly born childrens&their mothers.looting or arrange the looting of muslim property since its inception. they r also hindu wahabis created by britishers to keep society hot ÷d.swiss accnt is full with their money as they r also involve in all type of financial crimes.
Friends read the other article PILGRIMS DESERVE BETTER by Rajiv Sikri.THIS IS SHOWING HOW OUR gOVT IS PAMPHERING HAJ PILGRIMES.It is a shame for the Muslim community ie protest in Kashmir for Amarnath&for all the pseudo secularist who keep their mouth shut.It is good that moderate Hindus will jump to BJP with this mindless&fanatic acts of Muslims who are known only for fanaticism.A religion born & brought up with blood thirsty ridiculous breed called human.
RE:RE:PILGRIMS DESERVE BETTER
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 12:22 AM Permalink
muslims found the cave they r protecting the cave but trust donot have the right to grab the land which is meant for forestary.if yatri has any problem goverment should built hotels&resorts at proper place.regarding hajj subsidy goverment spends 1000 time on hindu feativals which continues almost entire year. they r also 18%&pay tax like us.this conspiracy governor is paid very handsomely.he will have good retired life
RE:PILGRIMS DESERVE BETTER
by All Right on Jun 29, 2008 07:08 AM Permalink
Tajender:
Direct Haj subsidy works out to about Rs. 400 Cr. Please elaborate how does govt spend Rs. 400000 Cr. on Hindu festivals? I reckon you are just spiteful, nothing else..
Impose terrorism tax on people involved in separatist activities, with slabs from 25% to 75% of income. Failure to pay tax should result in confiscation of partial or whole property depending upon degree of support to antinational activities. Also tax heavily on trade and agricultural exports from Kashmir. The tax should be used as compensation for security personnel killed in action. Those loyal to India should be spared. The property confiscated should be used to settle retired servicemen and their families. This will promote nationalism
RE:Overdone secular game of Muslim appeasement
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 12:25 AM Permalink
modi is teli by caste bjp is brahamin bania alliance mainly chitpavan brahamins they will kill him soon like mahatama ghandhi if he tries to become independent.
RE:muslims
by James bond on Jun 28, 2008 05:08 PM Permalink
bal thacheray, you cant be serious. I feel sorry that some hindus have become so insecure, stupid and naive that they believe Bala can solve their problems.
This is your own country, run and governed by hindus since independence and you have the balls to blame others for the problems that you have created.
The protesters are playing into the hands of right-wing hindu parties. They are drawing even liberal hindus closer to the ideology of RSS and BJP with their intolerance.
We in India would also not be much better than the present day Afghanis if we continue with the religious animosities. Promoting atheism is the only solution to counter religious fundamentalism.
Atleast atheists do not harm or kill others for getting rewards in an imaginary life here-after.
RE:Promote atheism
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 04:37 PM Permalink
Hilter was propped up by the Churches as a counter to communism. Pl read some more history.
RE:RE:Promote atheism
by Avinash on Jun 28, 2008 05:48 PM Permalink
No, he was not an atheist. He had some strange notions about the superiority of his race and that the Germans are born to rule the world. Anyway the atrocities committed by Hilter is no justification for committing atrocities in the name of religions and non-existent gods. Nearly 2/3rds of all wars fought by mankind were in the name of religion.
RE:RE:RE:Promote atheism
by All Right on Jun 29, 2008 07:11 AM Permalink
Wiki answers on Hitler:
The exact nature of Hitler's religious beliefs in adulthood are unclear. He spoke endlessly of providence but didn't attend church. (Like most of the Nazi leadership he had a Catholic upbringing).
The very fact that there are millions of questions floating around on Internet show that there is a case for my argument..
After all, you don't get to hear very often that Pope has embraced Islam... do you? :-)
RE:Promote atheism
by All Right on Jun 28, 2008 05:24 PM Permalink
Wiki answers on Hitler:
The exact nature of Hitler's religious beliefs in adulthood are unclear. He spoke endlessly of providence but didn't attend church. (Like most of the Nazi leadership he had a Catholic upbringing).
RE:Promote atheism
by rna on Jun 28, 2008 05:33 PM Permalink
Hitler was not an atheist, but he was not a Christian either. While he was materialist and rationalist in a lot of things, he also talked a lot about Providence, or Nature, as a sort of mystical force of fate, and he saw himself as somehow destined for victory even when the war was going badly for him, simply because of the purity of his purpose, his strength of will, and his feeling of destiny. I have even read that he believed in reincarnation. To me, some of his quotes and writings make it sound like he worshipped the German national identity. some make it seem like instead of God he worshipped or idealised or divinised Providence / Nature / Fate, with his glorious destiny assured no matter what and in some ways it seems to me like he worshipped himself.
RE:Promote atheism
by rna on Jun 29, 2008 02:16 PM Permalink
Atheism is characterized by an absence of belief in the existence of gods. This absence of belief generally comes about either through deliberate choice, or from an inherent inability to believe religious teachings which seem literally incredible. It is not a lack of belief born out of simple ignorance of religious teachings.....
But then, will u agree on foll statement? Isn't disbelieving in God the same thing as believing he doesn't exist?...Certaoinly not!!! So I coclude, by mentining Hitler was a FREETHINKER...ie, one who is prepared to consider any possibility, and who determines which ideas are right or wrong by bringing reason to bear, according to a consistent set of rules such as the scientific method.
Also, He always believed in himself, ideas, notions, and followed them considering himself as a god....that means he isnt answerable to anyone for his deeds!!!!!
RE:Promote atheism
by rna on Jun 28, 2008 05:45 PM Permalink
Nope...believe in god is nothing but faith, and crtainly Fate / Destiny / reincarnation are the result of faith...
When I say, He used to worship himself, that shows he is not Atheist but "monotheistic"...Which says there is only one god and that is me...
RE:Promote atheism
by tajender on Jun 29, 2008 12:28 AM Permalink
hitler was jew as his mother was jew.these people are wicked&chamoleon change their skin with time
RE:Promote atheism
by All Right on Jun 28, 2008 05:23 PM Permalink
Wiki answers on Hitler:
The exact nature of Hitler's religious beliefs in adulthood are unclear. He spoke endlessly of providence but didn't attend church. (Like most of the Nazi leadership he had a Catholic upbringing).
The very fact that there are millions of questions floating around on Internet show that there is a case for my argument..
After all, you don't get to hear very often that Pope has embraced Islam... do you? :-)
RE:Promote atheism
by Avinash on Jun 28, 2008 05:45 PM Permalink
Whether Hilter was an atheist or a religious person has no significance. The Country proclaiming "In God We Trsut" even of their Dollar Bills has killed more people than any one else. Search for "War Crime Tribunal" to know more about the atrocities committed by the participants in WW-II, especially Japanse, predominently beleiving in Buddhist non-violence. The less we talk about other religions, the better. Anyway the world has changed a lot since WW-II. There is no proof for the extistence of any god. The so-called holy books are creations of sur-realistic visionaries and are no more serious than Gulliver's Travels or Aesop's Fables. The Paradise filled with "wine, women, water, fruits, etc also existed only in the fertile imagination of some people. So don't harm any one for rewards in an imaginary life here-after.