Let it be surveyed sincierly how many condoms are used and by whom.Before spending state money make it sure that the condoms are really used by whom the plan is being introduced.Better deliver it free of cost in every home where study shows that there condoms are really needed.Do n't throw it on the streets to make hazards for the children using them as balloons and animals to eat them.
We don't have a social security system in our country. Here is one opportunity to humbly commence a system, whereby condoms could be made available free of charge, funded by the tax-payers, supported by corporations and NGOs, besides the educational media back-up and politicians only promising not to disrupt the system....to control HIV/AIDs?...No! To give a boost to control of population, prevent unwanted pregnancy, abortions and foetal terminations. Condoms as a HIV/AIDs control measure is questionable and misleading.....trying to catch a mosquito with a fishing net...the size of the HIV virus versus perforations existing in a condom, delibrately introduced by thinning to augment sensation. All the ultra-fine, ribbed, flavoured hoo-haas are bigger culprits. Besides, this does not stop the other forms of HIV spread thru sub-cutaneous, intra-muscular and intra-venous means or the mother/child umbilical route during gestation. Suggestions?...Anyone?
RE:RE:RE:Get a condom from STD booth
by Sheetal Kaur on Jun 17, 2008 05:40 PM Permalink
Why bring these stupid Poors in everything. Matter infact they are the worse as far as sexual behaviors are concerned. If they want pleasure as well as control their family then they should pay for the condoms just like any one else. Rich or Poor, it does not matter. PAY FOR THEM.
RE:Get a condom from STD booth
by manmauji on Jun 17, 2008 06:28 PM Permalink
Yah Sheetal, It sounds good.But the problem is that AIDS is fast spreading amongst the poors than riches due to lack of awareness and money besides their sexual behavior.Since we have more than 70% poors in our country, therefore it will not be a bad idea to start with poors to contain this dangerous epidemic.Anyway nothing to be upset about.What you have responded to, was said in a lighter vain.
