RE:NEED ADVISE FROM A TECHIE..HOW COME MY COMMENTS ON THE SAME ARTICLE DO NOT SHOW UP
by Desi on Jun 12, 2008 12:23 AM Permalink
Please do not live in a fool's paradise! If we had the the brain and resources, our country would not have been exploited in the first place!! Why blame the British and Sonia? If you have so much confidence in AAM AADMI and blame the politicians, why don't you become one and improve our lot. If you keep writing on this board, do you think what all you are saying is going to happen??? yeh Sonia ke baap ka country nehi hai magar Sonia ke saas ka country zaroor hai!!!
RE:Prophet Mohammed became king through Terror and Loot !!
by Vishal Sharma on Jun 12, 2008 12:32 AM Permalink
Mohammedji ne aap ka kya bigada hai? If u go into the history of pre-Mohammed Arabia, u wud conclude tht the coming of Mohammed was a good thing 4the Arabs. The Arabs, who consider themselves the descendents of Ishmael (Abraham's first born son),were always beaten down. There was a feeling among the Arabs, tht if the Jews had their Prophet, the Christians had theirs, why cud the Arabs not have their own Prophet? Now the brilliancy & genius of Mohammed was 2consider the State &Religion to be one entity thereby resulting in the militarization of religion - the Marxian Opium! So what's wrong? We view Islam from the examples of the crazy semi-literate jehadi maulvis of Pakistan terror factories or from the barbaric Muslim invaders of Central Asia who looted and enslaved her. That is y there is anger in ur heart. But 4a moment, why not view Mohammed from the viewpoint of an Arab!(Not going into the Shia-Sunni, Mohammed v/s Ali argument). India &Indians too have had many Prophets, but few were militaristic like Mohammed. I would say Chanakya & Ramdev (not the TV wala) but Shivaji's Guru were the last. I would stand up &salute Mohammed, even though I am a non-Muslim becoz I m very impressed by the militarization of his religion, which no 1 other than Krsna & lately Chanakya had been able to do. Mohammed's unification of State & Religion was adopted by the Christian crusaders who called it the policy of "Cuius Regio Eius Religio”(“Whoever's domain, his religion prevails%u20
Do u think R&AW is in any way involved in de-thorning the king. All know that R&AW is active in Nepal but just wondering whats they did there .. that would be in favour of India.
RE:R&AW
by Loan Shark on Jun 12, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
LOL ... RAW is just a buncha babus sitting on their hands all day or twidling their thumbs ... sipping free kee chai and eating free ka samosa ... do you think that these guys are real intelligence guys? these are just a buncha babus trying to keep tabs on their own people ... like those in defense ministry that they do not leak any secrets ... that's all they do, they do not do any activify in a foreign country except, if any, by accident.
so, don't have your hopes high on RAW ... there is now democracy in Nepal ... last time, the king overthrew the democratically elected govt. this time, the elected reps threw the king out.
I wish people in pakistan had the same courage and will to throw mushraff to the foxes.
RE:R&AW
by All Right on Jun 12, 2008 08:02 AM Permalink
And I wish the people in India someday muster enough courage to throw out Her Highness Madame Sonia Gandhiji, and His Highness Prince Charming Rahul Gandhiji..
The last HINDU kingdom in the world has vanished into the hands of CHINA through the maoists.
The great INDIAN nation is as usual in deep slumber with eyes wide open. the communist meet Prachanda in delhi to guide him!!! and help him to dethrone a HINDU kingdom and install a CHINESE rule!!!. The great Indian HINDU party,BJP/RSS looks the other way when THE ONLY HINDU KINGDOM IS wiped of the world slate.
RE:One more success for China
by satyarthi on Jun 11, 2008 11:40 PM Permalink
BJP, being the largest party should have made a statement upon negative develpments in Nepal.
RE:RE:One more success for China
by Loan Shark on Jun 12, 2008 12:23 AM Permalink
negative? there is democracy in Nepal and you call it negative? what's negative about the will of people deciding the fate of people in nepal ... what business does the king have to dictate to the people of nepal and live lavishly on their expense.
BJP is doing the right thing by not speaking up ... and in fact they shoudl support the developments in nepal
RE:RE:RE:One more success for China
by All Right on Jun 12, 2008 08:05 AM Permalink
What is the will of people? . . Maoists killing people?
Musharraf had loads of elections in Pakistan... do you call that the will of people?
Her Highness Madame Sonia Gandhiji and His Highness Prince Charming Rahul Gandhiji have been ruling the country taking up the sceptre handed down from Nehru to Indira to Rajeev ... do you call it the will of the people?
UK and Australia pledge their allegiance to the Queen ... do you think that is negative?
RE:RE:One more success for China
by Yes Chopra on Jun 11, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Nepal is done!
Think about India now!
And worry about what will happen when China takes over India!
All this money that Indians have made in the last 6 years will become "state property" under their communist rule!
But we deserve what is coming to us! All we have been doing is pampering regional socialist/communist governments. These same regional governments are going to be used in India to do what was done in Nepal!
So get ready to stop saying "Mera Bharat Mahaan" and start learning to say "Mera Bharat China ki Raan..."!!
RE:One more success for China
by Loan Shark on Jun 12, 2008 12:21 AM Permalink
china is not eyeing India ... do you think china wants our bihar and UP and rajasthan of for that matter tamil nadu, karnataka, AP, kerela or bengal
This would have retained the rich history of the country, the ONLY ONLY ONLY HINDU country in the world.
Rome is for Christains.
Republic--what a joke. WE have Maoists in control ie China backed with tangles of ISI.
NEPAL, SIKKIM, BHUTAN MUST be made full fledged states of INDIA, no questions asked. Have army regiments of these NEW states as integral parts of the Indian Armed forces.
The future of INDIA will remain very insecure and terrorteries unsafe so long as we have Sonia and Nehru clan anywhere close to power.
Communism MUST be constitutionally outlawed as in any OTHER democratic country. WE are a laughing stock.
DRAFT people like Ratan Tata and the educated class more active in politics-- in todays global envirnoment, the time of dhotiwalas and Nehru types is over.
Under POTA arrest ALL Naxals, Maoists, SIMI etc. These people are a national threat. Set up new prisons, USA has the highest number of people in jail in the world. Even for small traffic violations and here we are talking about NATIONAL security.
Reform election laws, Votes bought by bribing should be NOT counted and the candidate imprisioned and barred from running for a public office.
ALL schools must have THREE languages compulsory, HINDI, ENGLISH and OTHER eg mother tongue or lanuage of choice.
RE:The King should have been made as a figure head with no powers...
by M KishoreBabu on Jun 12, 2008 12:27 AM Permalink
I don't understand why hindi should be compulsory.. keep your hindi with you.. all langauages are equal...
RE:The King should have been made as a figure head with no powers...
by Loan Shark on Jun 12, 2008 12:28 AM Permalink
Not speaking Hindi, but eating bhindi should be compulsory.
RE:The King should have been made as a figure head with no powers...
by tajender on Jun 12, 2008 12:31 AM Permalink
mr chopra u r right but he was misguided by americans who knows nothing except killing they force him to kill brother &his family same night 1000people were killed in kathmandu on american advise.he was forced to fight with maoists instead of negotiations.every country needs moral head.he could do this job.i agrre with u.
If anyone thinks that Nepal has the people voice finally, one should be an ignorant. This is the beginning of the anarchy which would last for decades. No country in the world can function well in the hands of communists. We forget the 250 plus years of ruling in Nepal which brings relative democracy to people, though, it could have done much better. Can you imagine the 250 plus years of ruling by communists in Nepal? One fine day, Nepal has to fight hard like east Germany, Russia and other east European countries to get rid of communists. The first thing they will do is absolute control, bring enormous Mao’s style communists rules and anti-India sentiments from china and PAK.
RE:end of the monarchy and beginning of the anarchy.
by Loan Shark on Jun 12, 2008 12:24 AM Permalink
there is no anarchy in India and India is on a path of progress
RE:end of the monarchy and beginning of the anarchy.
by All Right on Jun 12, 2008 07:51 AM Permalink
Sorry. Apart from the few standing monarchies like Britain and Australia, India too is running its own version of The Shahs of Nepal...
RE:end of the monarchy and beginning of the anarchy.
by Proud Hindustani on Jun 11, 2008 11:38 PM Permalink
Read my post above. ARM the HINDU Nepalese to the hilt, do the same for Sikkim, Bhutan.
INDIA MUST OPENLY BACK the Dalai Lama for a free Tibet. If they want arms they should be provided to level the playing field. Send the Indian Muslims to the muslin NW parts of China, let them prove their loyalty to India as Indian citizens.
RE:end of the monarchy and beginning of the anarchy.
by satyarthi on Jun 11, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink
Educate hindus. Give them a global perspective. Tell them what happened to them in past and the factors and figures responsible for that misery. Force the political leadership to act, act with a vision.
China has entered into Nepal in the name of Maoists! India ? You conquered Bangladesh in 1971 war with Pakistan and handed it over to the intending ruler of Bangladesh! H e is killed and now it ha gone to the hands of antiindians who are creating all security problems! India , while amidst rouges all around , LEARN HOW TO ACT AND SAVE YOUR CITIZENS' INTERESTS! WHY CPM IS TALKING ANTI INDIAN BEING IN GOVERNACE , MAY BE FROM OUTSIDE MINISTRY~!
Guess... what goes around comes around.... Nepal's monarchy was weakened by another royal family Ranas. They dug their own grave... and political morons in India never supported a true democratic front there... so it finally went to maoists....
RE:Didn't Gynanendra kill his own family.?
by manish rogi on Jun 11, 2008 11:01 PM Permalink
Well.. gunning own family for throne is nothing new in world history. Did you mean to say that out around 100 close relatives/friends who were in palace during shooting were all 'outside' commies? hard to believe that....
Anyway it is a true failure from Indian govt side by not cultivating a indian leaning democratic movement there... thats for sure.
