Mohammedji ne aap ka kya bigada hai? If u go into the history of pre-Mohammed Arabia, u wud conclude tht the coming of Mohammed was a good thing 4the Arabs. The Arabs, who consider themselves the descendents of Ishmael (Abraham's first born son),were always beaten down. There was a feeling among the Arabs, tht if the Jews had their Prophet, the Christians had theirs, why cud the Arabs not have their own Prophet? Now the brilliancy & genius of Mohammed was 2consider the State &Religion to be one entity thereby resulting in the militarization of religion - the Marxian Opium! So what's wrong? We view Islam from the examples of the crazy semi-literate jehadi maulvis of Pakistan terror factories or from the barbaric Muslim invaders of Central Asia who looted and enslaved her. That is y there is anger in ur heart. But 4a moment, why not view Mohammed from the viewpoint of an Arab!(Not going into the Shia-Sunni, Mohammed v/s Ali argument). India &Indians too have had many Prophets, but few were militaristic like Mohammed. I would say Chanakya & Ramdev (not the TV wala) but Shivaji's Guru were the last. I would stand up &salute Mohammed, even though I am a non-Muslim becoz I m very impressed by the militarization of his religion, which no 1 other than Krsna & lately Chanakya had been able to do. Mohammed's unification of State & Religion was adopted by the Christian crusaders who called it the policy of "Cuius Regio Eius Religio”(“Whoever's domain, his religion prevails%u20
