RE:Christianity is still enemy # 1 for Islam
by rajesh roul on Jul 25, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
Do not mess up with Christians. Are Afganistan, and Iraq not enough for you Muslims. Christian Brothers are killing Muslim Brothers all over the World. Even tiny Israel is killing Muslims all around. Christian Brothers are looking for new Grounds to fight against Muslims. Iran is their next Target. Christian Brothers' target is as following: "Muslims kill one Christian Brother, Christian Brothers kill 1000 Muslim Brothers and 1000 Muslim Sisters." But actually christian brothers normally do not fight. Who can fight against the Lion. Christian Brothers are like Lions and Muslims are like Ants. An ant may pinch a Lion, but a Lion will not react, but when the Lion reacts, millions of ants will fall. Your Muslim Brothers are playing with Crackers in Afganistan and Iraq, but they do not understand Christian Brothers do not play with Crackers, but Christian Brothers play with Nuclear and Hydrogen Bombs. If one will be released onto Muslims, the entire Islam will be wiped out.
RE:Christianity is still enemy # 1 for Islam
by grir reeg on Jul 24, 2008 11:42 PM Permalink
christians have got u nice and good. u can't do anything now. they are ufcking u right and left. just see where muslim population reaches just in a decade. an endangered species. there will muslim skeletons in american museums next to neanderthal man.
RE:Christianity is still enemy # 1 for Islam
by Moon and Star on Jul 24, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink
You made me laugh. Forget about left or right, its time for you check who is getting ufcked in the middle.
1.The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
2.The ending "Mahal"is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
3.The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
4.Since the lady's name was Mumtaz (ending with 'Z') the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a 'J').
5.Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
6.The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidence of Name.
by HP on Jul 25, 2008 12:15 AM Permalink
then lets break it , where are the Kar Sewaks, I finally got it, they came to Taj for surveying the Area and chalking out the plans for demolition , but only takklu buddha is busy fulfilling his last wish so i think modi is fit for the job he can team up with mayawati, any ways she had already planned to build Maya Taj Grand so some portion cud be left for these guys.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidence of Name.
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:34 PM Permalink
Continued from above....
7.Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?
8.Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely, 'Taj' and' Mahal' are of Sanskrit origin.
This is pathetic. How will the Hindus feel if muslims go and offer namaz at somnath Temple. This is sheer appeasement of Majority community not minorities in India.
RE:appeasement of Majority community not minorities
by phani nori on Jul 24, 2008 11:34 PM Permalink
even for muslims its not a mosque!!!!!!!!! its only a monument and cannot be compared to any religious praying places
RE:appeasement of Majority community not minorities
by Neeraj on Jul 24, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Don't be a Jingoist. Its time to follow the Indian constitution and rule of law for a better India.
RE:appeasement of Majority community not minorities
by satyarthi on Jul 24, 2008 11:38 PM Permalink
Taj Mahal is not maszid. Muslims are free to perform namaj in a cremetary. Please don't bring Somnath Temple in discussion.
RE:appeasement of Majority community not minorities
by Indian on Jul 24, 2008 11:53 PM Permalink
The mosque is NOT within the premises of TAJ MAHAL, my friendly supporter of constitution. By the way, for your academic interest, India was not even a secular country as per constitution, UNTIL INDIRA FEROZE KHAN GANDHI made it one through a constitutional amendment! Did your forefathers who designed the original constitution, not have the brains to follow your kind of mentality OR are you too corrupted with media and communist propaganda on the definition of INDIA?
There is a saying "History is always written by victors"
There are several historical facts that have been twisted by kings and emperors to suit their wishes. Yes I am convinced about the Tejo Mahal story as well as the fact that the hands of the chief architect were c.u.t off, many times Mughal emperors also c.u.t off the heads of the "karigars" or artisans. Also remember the fact that during the tyrannical Mughal rule, it was a crime even to speak against the written history that the emperor has decided its written as, you raise your voice and your head was cut of as voice of decent were always supressed by the Mughals.
That even makes the proofs given by Mr Oak even more interesting as they are gathered from local folklores. We Indians have shamelessly gulped down the history written by the Mughals, the British and latter the Leftists without ever questioning the authenticity of that.
Hence I fully subscribe and believe that Taj Mahal was indeed a Temple of Lord Shiva, as much I believe that there lies a sunken city of Dwarka in the sea and there are indeed 7 submerged temples in sea at Mahabalipuram.
RE:destroy the parliament
by grir reeg on Jul 24, 2008 11:29 PM Permalink
what happened to the xtian's monkey compassion? destroying homes of slum people?
Taj Mahal is a symbol of love, that everybody loves it and love to see once in a life time. May be it is built by Shajahan a Muslim King, but the ultimate theeme is LOVE not the religion. So it is better not to stain it with religious colors. It is also a national heritage. Better not to refer TAJ as a religios symbol then as LOVE.
RE:Taj is not related to religion......
by Nandakumar M on Jul 24, 2008 11:36 PM Permalink
smart as. its a simbol of hate. hate towards hindus, this symbol was built by converting a hindu temple, and the excuse was shahjahan's wife. what love r u talking about? shahjahan had multiple wifes, he had raped multiple women. don't crap as if he was a ek pathni vrat.
