it is not a big deal...every mp has been bought....look at SP they shd have given easily 100 crores....4000 crores for sonia is not a big deal..............even to buy 100 mp for this govt is not a big deal...its public money who has been swallowed by the governmnet and the mp..........
RE:wats the big deal.........
by RK J on Jul 22, 2008 09:13 PM Permalink
Why!! Didnt NDA had money to buy MPs!! Wht abt putting it in this manne, NDA/BJP ofered money to CPM n BSP to ditch UPA.. Wht u say abt it!! If u dont buy it thn get lost..
RE:wats the big deal.........
by animesh singh on Jul 22, 2008 09:18 PM Permalink
bhai main tumhari sthithi samjh sakta huun. aisa karo,, aaj tharra pii kar so jao. subah baat karenge. ok
THE BEST THING OUT OF THE DISCUSSION IN PARLIAMENT WAS THE NATION SAW ADVANI SITTING LIKE A JOKER IN THE PARLIAMENT WITH NO VALID ARGUMENTS BUT SOME FOOLISH STATEMENTS (JUST FOR THE SAKE OF IT). NATION SAW ADVANI MAKING BIG TAMASHA REFERING TO DIED NEHRU (1962/64?) OPPOSING NPT IN 1970!! THE GUY DIDNT KNOW MUCH, AND TALKED ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE EXCEPT NUC DEAL. AND FINALLY THE DRAMA... REMEMBER THE SAME GUY IS EVERYDAYSENDING CRORES OF MONEY TO KARNATAKA TO BUY MORE MLA FROM CONGRESS & JDS. HE ALREADY BOUGHT 6 OF THEM!
ANYWAY THE REST AMAR SINGH WILL SEE. HE SHOULD BE KNOWING MORE MURKY AFFAIRS OF ADVANI AND HIS PARTY. ADVANI AND HIS PARTY BOUGHT BIG DAMAGE TO INDIA AND THEY ARE A SHAME ON INDIA
RE:advani -real
by Niranjan on Jul 22, 2008 09:25 PM Permalink
Not only that he was attacking Manmohan Singh personally with sarcasm like a grassroot level platform speaker forgetting he(MMS) is PM of a country.
RE:advani -real
by RK J on Jul 22, 2008 09:16 PM Permalink
He did little.. People like Advani should b honored with chappals.. Bloody coward.. Murder conspirer..
DONT WORRY...CONGRESS ARE FOR THE 1st TIME EVER IN A MINORATY IN THE UPPER HOUSE OF PARLMENT....WHERE THEY WILL BE HAMMERED ...THEN IN LESS THEN A YEARS TIME CONGRESS WILL GET HAMMERED IN THE GENERAL ELECTIONS
RE:Confidence Vote
by Sam K. John on Jul 22, 2008 09:13 PM Permalink
why give a religious colour? Americans are infidels. Only people like you would call them as Christians. This deal is between two nations and not communities
DONT WORRY...CONGRESS ARE FOR THE 1st TIME EVER IN A MINORATY IN THE UPPER HOUSE OF PARLMENT....WHERE THEY WILL BE HAMMERED ...THEN IN LESS THEN A YEARS TIME CONGRESS WILL GET HAMMERED IN THE GENERAL ELECTIONS
RE:tiger200002
by Sam K. John on Jul 22, 2008 09:07 PM Permalink
For now, you are being hammered for supporting the anti-congress group. Take a pill so that you can sleep friend.
A 12% inflation, indifference towards farmers suicide, food grain shortage, thousands reeling under flood, common man crying with pain due to price rise, Ambanis-Tatas becoming double rich.And Govt showing that nuclear deal is cure for all wef today. :-(
The PM is a battered victor. Just 4 votes more than 271. Is it a momemt to celebrate or regret?
Here are the costs the PM has paid:
1. Bringing his numbers in parliament from 345 to 275 (just 4 more than the majority). 2. You did defections/abstention from opposition camp. 3. You made a crime convict to Coal Minister. 4. You too support from hard core criminal convicts serving imprisonment who are convicted for mass murders, rape, arson, extortion and anti national activities. 5. You have ignored common man issues and put your personal agenda on top.
As a result, you Govrnment is really in ICU now as you are facing stiffer challenge to save it than earlier.
You are the weakest ever. You have completely lost what you gained the respect you gained during 1991-96.
RE:RE:Victory at what cost?
by anmol anand on Jul 22, 2008 09:12 PM Permalink
I don't know if u are aware of the nuclear deal benefits, electricity for all, power developments to run plants and factories that subsequently will employ the common man. Get a life, the PM has done what is most feasible, he can't change the face of India in a short time, everything takes time, if inflation is growing, so is Economy. If economy is growing, so are labour getting attracted to Delhi for instance to find jobs. And above all, if power is ensured through nuclear reactors, farming, irrigation and basic electricity in ever far flung, secluded government hospitals will be ensured. If Edison would have been alive today, he would have been mocking at u coz u don't realise the benefits, causes, effects of not having electricity when water is depleting rapidly.
If PM has got low support, that is because i challenge you that most MP's just want to topple the govt to bring in theirs and i can confidently say most of them think its some kind of nuclear bomb or something that is being created by Indo-US ties.
If u want to do something for India,there are vacancies in Orrisa government schools in villages, start teaching children part time, do something for ur country.
RE:RE:RE:Victory at what cost?
by SANTANU RAY on Jul 22, 2008 09:21 PM Permalink
Believe me Anmol Anand (is it a name?), you have very less knowledge about the Nuclear issue which is being depicted in your comment. by the means the Nuclear deal is going to make a sea change, not even in next 40 years. But the point he raised are partly true. No one, neither the Govt, nor the opposition raised the real problematic concerns of the common men. I am congratulating our PM, and I wish we proceed as a proud country. But just a request that by no means we should loose our sovereign policy. Thank you.
RE:Victory at what cost?
by SANTANU RAY on Jul 22, 2008 09:16 PM Permalink
Yes Shrikant, you are right. The Govt actually is loosing the battle/war. But the point is "Who is the winner?". Nobody. And the worst sufferer is the common people. You raised the issues properly and those issues should be discussed in the parliament. But sadly no one, not the Govt, not the Opposition did their job. Sadly it's the real picture of the current politics.
RE:RE:Victory at what cost?
by RK J on Jul 22, 2008 09:18 PM Permalink
Philosphy mat jhaar be.. "Who is the winner".. UPA is the winner.. India is the winner.. n all sane people are winner.. Samajh me aayi baat!
RE:RE:RE:Victory at what cost?
by SANTANU RAY on Jul 22, 2008 09:24 PM Permalink
hyan yaar, samajh me aayi baat. Lekin tereko keya economics yah political science ati he keya? nehi ati, to ja ke jhanda hilake mosti korna, yahan pe discuss korne kiun aaya????? Masti korna yaar, kaheko time waste korta hey/??????
RE:Victory at what cost?
by Sam K. John on Jul 22, 2008 09:09 PM Permalink
All those who bite the dust finally philosophise. Dont worry. Take a sleeping pill.
RE:Victory at what cost?
by Mohan Cherian on Jul 22, 2008 09:12 PM Permalink
You loser !!! shutup and get lost to china with the commies. Singh is King he is the best PM ever had you foool shitkant
RE:Victory at what cost?
by Guest on Jul 22, 2008 09:29 PM Permalink
Its a great Augary that UPA led govt. got reinstated. The entire credit goes to Dr.Manmohan singh for his firmness and determination to fill the void in terms of Energy prevailing Energy crisis. Thanks to Dr.Abdul Kalam for the intervention at the appropriate time. I can see an young Prime Minister in Mr.Rahul Gandhi who made a niche of himself in the mids of uncouth Parlimentarians, and this only reminds me of Sri Jawaharlal Nehru in front of every one in the form of Mr.Rahul and embodiment of truth and service. Its a lesson to all the negative forces of the country and threy in turn fall in line with Mr.Rahul's noble thinking of unity in diversity to implement the Indo-US Nuclear treaty in the right perspective, in the wider interest of the Nation. T.D.S.SUNDHARAM AGE-60yrs-WELLNESS COACH -HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL-CURRENTLY IN 65 COUNTRIES-MILLIONS OF TESTIMONIALS-28YRS sparetime_success@hotmail.com
RE:Victory at what cost?
by tdssundharam on Jul 23, 2008 09:04 PM Permalink
BJP lost the Govt. by one vote!! Then UPA winning by 4 votes is foiur times better!! whatever has happened is just as "lot of watewr has flown over the bridge"!!
