RE:Mayawati ki maa.a ki.....
by Sharma on Jul 21, 2008 05:22 PM Permalink
Ab hum sabhi Bharatwasi bhaut jald hi ek naye itihaas ki aur agrasar hain jisme hame wo sab dekhne sunne aur karne ko milega jo BJP ya Congress ke raaj mein nahi mila
Our Didi speaks the same language as our Left parties (anti-congress). She also tows the same line of politics as the Left did (anti-industrialisation). Just to stand aloof from the turmoil and watch others and having nothing much to do on her won will never lead her to either the people or to her own political aspirations. There is very common saying in Bengali that "Du nouko te paa dawa jaina" (you cannot put your feet on two boats at the same time)... but she always manages to do it. She did such a mistake earlier once when she heeded to Pranab Mukherjee's advice and resigned out of the Railway Minister's position and subsequently lost what ever good work she had done. Even now if she feels that this Congress government has not done much for the poor then there is no harm in casting her vote against the confidence motion rather than abstaining. After all she can go back to people in Bengal and say that it was the Left who supported this anti poor government and just before the Elections they acted as opportunists. As regards to Soumen'da is concerned, he himself is a local leader and could never establish himself (beyond some parts of Kolkata) and i fear cannot do much even if he has floated his own party.
RE:Indecisive Mamata'di
by Krishna Pal on Jul 21, 2008 05:19 PM Permalink
The amount we hate these Chinese (Communists) much more than that we respect Mamata Banerjee but she should come in the active politics because days are gone the way she does it. She should follow Subhash Chandra Bose path not the Chinese politics.
RE:Indecisive Mamata'di
by Sharma on Jul 21, 2008 05:31 PM Permalink
She is similar of EX CM of Madhya Pradesh Uma Bharti she had lost her ground and knows her reality that if she has to stand in politics must support a party and she had took decision of not to Vote.
Already everything is falling in its place.BJP/RSS Media financed by American Capitalistic Money has already started a campaign that congress will win the trust vote.Comman Man is suffering he desperately wants social developments as his counterparts in Bengal and Kerla .Comman Man is waiting for his chance to vote out this capitalistic govt,In next election LEFT will rule India .Comman Man will be happy he will enjoy fruits of paradise as enjoyed by people of Kerla and bengal.BEWARE American agents LEFT is comming
RE:TRUST VOTE A JOKE
by Bhardwaj Velamakanni on Jul 21, 2008 06:18 PM Permalink
You communists have forced an unwanted early elections on the common man - Stop talkign about Common Men buddy .. "Common men" aint same as "China Men"
RE:TRUST VOTE A JOKE
by biting dog on Jul 21, 2008 05:08 PM Permalink
Sahadevan ji forget Ruling India try how you could get a total 30 seats from the 3 downtrodden states..
RE:TRUST VOTE A JOKE
by shakti kapooor on Jul 21, 2008 05:10 PM Permalink
how can BJP/RSS Media financed by American Capitalistic Money start a campign that congress will trust vote?? if it is so BJP/RSS people will endorse themselves only & why others?
They were against Quit India then why the hell congress took their support. If they support Congress, they are secular, if they withdraw support they are anti-national. Congress is secular despite hundred of riots, 1984 massacre etc.
My one liner for congressi, those who live in glass houses should not throw stones on others. This greed of taking credit for everything and no answerability for Kashmir, Arunachal, 1984 sikh riots, opening gates of ram mandir. allowing Qutrochi to flee with tax payers money and then give and take with muslims on shah bano case. mamta is right.
RE:RE:Secular colour of congress.
by RK J on Jul 21, 2008 05:18 PM Permalink
U knw James, shoting at the top of ur voice doesnt converts a lie in to truth.. As for ur allegations, Sikh Riots in 1984 was a result of Golden Temple issue.. Indira Gandhi had taken a bold decision n unfortunately she had to pay for her price.. As for Jammu Kashmir n Arunachal Pradesh issues, it was more the fault of International fraternity n not the Indian Government.. For the rest of the allegations, I dont need to explain thm as they r kind of allegations whose worth was nvr proved..
RE:Secular colour of congress.
by Bhardwaj Velamakanni on Jul 21, 2008 06:12 PM Permalink
Sikh Riots - Blame Golden Tample Kashmir - Blame International Community Arunachal - Again International Community Any other riot - Blame the local people But if itz Gujarat - it's only BJP & BJP - Nobody else .. right? If your neighbor's wife hits her husband tomorrow, it must be because of BJP and Narendra Modi eh? :))
RE:Secular colour of congress.
by Sharma on Jul 21, 2008 05:35 PM Permalink
kashir aurnanchal aur aise kitne hi example hain congress ke, leking congress abhi bhi apne aap ko doodh ki dhuli hui maanti hai.
kis ka itihaas achha hai aur kiska bura ye ham bhartiyon ke haath mein hai
RE:Secular colour of congress.
by Bhardwaj Velamakanni on Jul 21, 2008 06:22 PM Permalink
What do you know about them by the way and what else do you wnat to link them with? - Just like the way you linked Post Indira Assassination riots to the Golden Temple lolz :))
Mamta and Advani were not good at debate. They were not speaking on the matter. Mamta shouting was like "thotha chana baze ghana". She would be alone all the times and not to change.
RE:Mamta what for
by James Bond on Jul 21, 2008 04:59 PM Permalink
On 19th July DPCC(Delhi congress committe) organized a seminar to educate party's MLAs on Nuclear deal. Surprisingly, after the seminar, noneof the member had any knowledge about CTBT, NPT. One MLA did not know the meaning of words like Congress, treaty etc.
Even Sonia speaks from the top of platform everywhere. If she is such a great leader, has she ever spoken on televison on important issues. Let her debate with Sushma Swaraj on issues of national importance.
How Indira Gandhi used to fool poor Rajasthani. She use to apply french perfumes and poor villagers use to say she smells very good because she is a pious soul. This propoganda of smell was mystery for poor villagers of rajasthan.
RE:Mamta what for
by RK J on Jul 21, 2008 05:19 PM Permalink
James.. These r really cheapest kind of tricks tht u r using.. Did u attend tht "Delhi congress committe" seminar?? How come only u knw abt these things?? Dont make stories man!!
RE:Mamta what for
by Anurag Pare on Jul 21, 2008 05:07 PM Permalink
Congress is now became Nehru-Gandhi Company Ltd. and other congress are in the race of chair and othr who are not having so much telent then they are bent down infront of Sonia, Rahul and Priyanka and survive. So, here if Mamta will absent than she will be again congressi after the vote of confidance.
RE:Mayavati
by Mohit Bhownani on Jul 21, 2008 05:04 PM Permalink
does ur prime minister knows what is the nuclear deal, if the nuclear deal is good for our country then why the Prime Minister is not disclosing all its objects, he can give the copy of these deals to other country then why not India. why not India? First can any one give me the answer of this?
RE:RE:Mayavati
by RK J on Jul 21, 2008 05:07 PM Permalink
U r definitely a jerk Mohit.. Details of the deal has been made public.. Just dont jump in the discussion if u dont have the slightest idea wht is being talked abt.. I repeat.. deal had been made public, go and read it.. n if u r able to understand all the points thn come back.. It's not a wise thing to pint a finger to a scholar like Dr. Singh.. specially whn u urself r too ignorant abt the issues..
RE:Mayavati
by RK J on Jul 21, 2008 05:04 PM Permalink
Certainly no dude.. "Now is not the time to discuss if the nuclear deal is to be signed or not" She tried to understand, could.. n so chose the safest path..
with only one MP no one gave her a damn it seems...thats why she doesnt want to go to Delhi for trust vote. and since when did she start representing Bengal ? Bengal will not go to Delhi and Delhi shoud come to Bengal..she is useless politician
sanyalji Bengal se bahar bhi bharat hain. There is India out of Bengal also. & dont say "Bengal will not go to Delhi and Delhi shoud come to Bengal" what is economical position of bengal in the country. who made it like a hell.
RE:No one game her a damn
by Abhishek Chatterjee on Jul 21, 2008 05:20 PM Permalink
He has not said it...He has only quoted Mamata Banerjee's line. Look before you comment.
Yes, It is really high time to think and find solution for the Ruling Government "When the prices of essential commodities are going through the roof, the government should have focused on curbing inflation rather than stirring up the controversy over the nuclear deal. Now is not the time to discuss if the nuclear deal is to be signed or not, now is the time to stand by the poor people of India who are struggling to meet both ends meet," the Trinamool Congress leader said.
Really it is true to think about common peoples needs, people are dying without food, shelter, instead govt, is thinking about hi-fi issues, for which our country is a longway to go.
I REQUEST ALL OUR COUNTRY MEN TO AGREE AND SUPPORT THIS.
RE:100 % TRUE PATRIOTISM FROM MAMATA BANERJEE
by Sharma on Jul 21, 2008 05:28 PM Permalink
Why Ms Mamta has not going to give her vote against the Ruling party coz Congress has made for only rich people and opposition is for common man.
RE:@ All Right
by Rukmesh Singh on Jul 21, 2008 04:54 PM Permalink
fool, she's on the list of MPs who will speak. tumhe kya lagta hai ki kya sirf atal ko bolna aata hai ?
They were against "Quit India" They did not accepted India's Independent till 1950. They supported China during Indo-China War. They were against computer literacy.
... and they oppose anything that is good for the country.
A group of members who never works and won't allow to work others.
A group of people only knows how to create problem and then call for harthal/bandh.
A group of criminals.
Their ideology- to make people more poor and poor to get the vote
RE:Left means..
by Shyam on Jul 21, 2008 05:07 PM Permalink
BJP does not date back to 1947. It is a newer party. There was only something called Jan Sangh then and that was not a political party in 1947!
RE:RE:RE:Left means..
by Shyam on Jul 21, 2008 05:08 PM Permalink
HAHAHA, Dear friends, I can understand it is Commies but how come Sahadevan KK is writing against Commies? Is it not strange?
