Winter comes again n again, Summer comes again n again, But the person like Advani will not come again, Because GOD never makes the same mistake again n again....
RE:RE:God never makes the same mistake again n agian
by TheOneAndOnly on Jul 15, 2008 11:11 PM Permalink
Your GOD seems to be One Who KEEPS MAKING mistakes over Mistakes. And You at last have confirmed that He "never makes the Same mistake again n again...."
Better Recheck, If you consider god, is a Real GOD or a Shaithan.
MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Deceiver, Fraud. He and his Italian master are the master of these methods. Thats why George Farnandes said, that Italian woman is a habitual lier. We have not forgot, MM Singh said before dissolving Bihar assembly, there is a worst type of horse trading going on in Bihar. Then in the midnight, he lied and cheated president Kalam in Moscow to get singed a paper to dissolve Bihar Assembly. Before sunrise next morning, Bihar assembly was dissolved. What happened later? Supreme Court slapt on two faces of this fraud, lier and cheater Singh. And Congress made Buta Singh, Govornor, a scapegoat. List goes on. On nuclear issue, MM Singh never spoked a word of truth. Lies are his best instruments of defense and deceive the nation.
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 15, 2008 11:06 PM Permalink
Bangaru Laxman is Shining India's icon, Jaya Jaitley was collecting money on behalf of her party(George Fernandes), BJP's MPs caught in money for question scam were doing public service.
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by Sabka Baap on Jul 15, 2008 11:17 PM Permalink
Twinkle twinkle little star, You should know what you are, And once you know what you are, Mental hospital is not so far.
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by sweeto t on Jul 16, 2008 12:21 AM Permalink
Modi supporters themselves were accepting the fact that Modi is d person who let the gujrat burn. That is the power of bjp for their own motive they can burn anything demolish anything
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by ByTheWay on Jul 15, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
for what rohiet ? these people dont understand or either they dont want to understand. for them everything anti Hindu/BJP is secular. Cong can sleep with a pakistani outfit PDP in JK and muslim league in kerala, still they will call BJP a communal party - what a joke.
Then I read one comment that MMSingh has been working for the betterment of our country in these last 4 yrs. Singh working for the betterment of the country ? another bloody joke. Yes he was working for the betterment of the country when his party was sleeping with a pakistani group named PDP in JK.
Yes he was working for the betterment of the country when he called Kalam at midnight when he was in Russia and lied Kalam about the developments in Bihar to order Prez rule when NDA had the majority.
Yes he was working for the betterment of the country when he says i cant show the Ndeal text to Indians as Indian publis is 3rd party but he will publish it globally in G8.
Yes he was working for the betterment of India when using the govt bailed out the italian Quattrocchi for madam manio.
Yes he was working for the betterment of the country when his party revoked SASB deal.
Yes he is working for the betterment of the country when he dont have an answer to the inflation we cuurently have - but his priority is to make his legacy through Ndeal.
Yes he was working for the betterment of the country when his govt was misusing the governors post in Assam, Karanataka, Bihar, Goa, Jharkhand...
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by sylesh gopan on Jul 15, 2008 11:42 PM Permalink
@ sabka baap , thats exactly your problem. Even when I was telling you abt things happened after 2004, you are going more into the past. pathetic !anyway dont you worry, India will shine again. but no meaning in debating with you, you think that frogs well is the real world. And the sad part is you will never get to see the real one.
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by Sabka Baap on Jul 15, 2008 11:48 PM Permalink
Before 2004 BJP was in power they had everything but could repeat themself. people had given 3 chance to Vajpai the great leader but jhoothvani strictly NO. Your analysis will keep going on n on. Check the fact, Do not flow with flow.
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by Sabka Baap on Jul 15, 2008 11:19 PM Permalink
People had enough with BJP. They are true copy of congress so why not the original one.
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by sylesh gopan on Jul 15, 2008 11:20 PM Permalink
Cong/UPA has done enuf in the last 4 years[also in the last 60 yrs] for BJP to win. We may not need to do anything extra. :)
RE:RE:RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by Sabka Baap on Jul 15, 2008 11:27 PM Permalink
BJP never initiated to provide land to Amarnath shrine board, it is done by congress but could not get support from PDP.
RE:RE:RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by sylesh gopan on Jul 15, 2008 11:24 PM Permalink
@sabka baap, I'm not prejudiced and I dont debate from one ankle. But BJP is far better than cong, atleast they are not hypocryts. Unlike cong who will say,do & behave in anyway to get some minority votes[read pseudo secularism], BJP atleast say what they believe in. If not how come cong revoke a land deal just because a pakistani party[pdp] protested ? We can have subsidies for Hajj, but no facilities for Amarnath trip. I do not have any issue with giving subsidies or facilities for muslim pilgrims, i do respect all religions...but how come this be a one sided story from the time of Gandhi ?
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by ByTheWay on Jul 16, 2008 12:00 AM Permalink
@sabka baap - if you have your facts, then debate. dont show your[cong] real stds by clicking on abuse button for this following msg i had posted -
exactly ! check the facts or try to come out of the well. thats not thw world. may be you are happy being a slave of a party which has been decieving the junta with a manufactured gandhi legacy for decades now. if not how come daugther of nehru, married to a muslim, one becomes gandhi
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by sylesh gopan on Jul 15, 2008 11:34 PM Permalink
@sabka baap - this is what i told you. even when people try to reach to you or make you understand the real facts you like congress behaves like a frog in a well. But I do agree mate, realty bites, and the realty is that the Indian Junta started kicking out all congress govts from the office since 2004 state after state. Now another big one is in the offer, you cong just need to show its face or whatever body part, rest the public will do with the 'aam aadmi's haath or foot'. got it ? Then , it dint take BJP 60 yrs to defeat a 100 party, it just took 12 years 84-96. Mate, Ignorance is NOT always a bliss !
RE:MM Singh - A Lier, Cheater, Fraud.
by sriram vuppala on Jul 15, 2008 11:37 PM Permalink
Please don't include Narsimha Rao in this. He knows 14 languages and he is one who took India out of trouble in 92 when the country was its feet of world bank. Whatever he has done is to save the country and he didn't accumulated the assets.
RE:fools!
by Bharat Kr on Jul 15, 2008 10:41 PM Permalink
BJP is not opposing Nuclear deal. BJP is opposing the deal in its present form, which is against our nation's interests. The deal in its present form will ban India any further nuclear test, strip India as nuclear weapon state and asked to roll-back nuke weapon program. Do we want this? What will happen to us, if China or Pakis invade us? Does US will come to our help? No way. MM Singh condemned the nuke test in 1998, for him India don't need to have nuke weapon. He is happy when US amd Bush praises him, but don't care 1 billion plus peoples voices. He is the neo-dictator of India.
RE:fools!
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 15, 2008 10:55 PM Permalink
Bharat Kr, B(ad) J(oker) Party was willing to accept CTBT and sign NPT to get this type of deal as per Strobe Talbott who had 2 year long dialogue with Jaswant Singh. Go and read his book. You must be a moron to belive what rude (Rudy) and Venky are shouting to save their shame. They do not realise that their knickers are down and even chhaddis are not their to hide their dirty object(ive)s.
RE:RE:fools!
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 15, 2008 11:10 PM Permalink
Sindhis are a proud community and I am one of them. They have not cribbed about leaving their motherland and have risen by dint of their hard work which is envy of many in India. It is other religious zealots and bigots who spread hatred in the name of religion who are destroying this great land of India.It is knickerwalas who under the direction of RSS try to divide majority and minority community for their greed and selfish ends.
RE:fools!
by Sabka Baap on Jul 15, 2008 11:31 PM Permalink
Rohiet you are free to correct the problem. How Bangladeshi have been thrown out by BJP workers.
RE:fools!
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 15, 2008 11:14 PM Permalink
That is because 82 year old budhavoo's aim is to somehow grab PM's chair. Kissa Kursi Ka.
RE:fools!
by sylesh gopan on Jul 15, 2008 11:28 PM Permalink
And you believe an american journalist who was a russian spy ? go ahead dude..its nice. Atleast read something worth.
RE:fools!
by sweeto t on Jul 16, 2008 12:28 AM Permalink
For gods sake please do understand what the text is all about do not go by any particular person said something in some news channel or by what your family is saying or by what ur mother tounge news paper is telling.
RE:fools!
by deepak on Jul 15, 2008 10:54 PM Permalink
Try to differentiate the issues... If Nuclear tests were opposed by congress in 1998, BJP is opposing Nuclear deal because it would limit nuclear testing, which ultimately will corrospont to wishes of congress in 1998, when they opposed the testing.. Do you oppose that India loses its ability to do nuclear tests? Every nuclear bomb scientists know, tests is intergral part of development reuqires many tests, not just pokharan ll...
what a rediculous nonsensical observation dowbting prome minister's patriotism by the so called thinkpad.who stopped indegeneous development. our indegeneous plants are idling for want of nuclear fuel.The nuclear deal brings in more nuclear plants besides feeding our indegeneous nuclear power plants
RE:RE:nucleardeal
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:48 PM Permalink
If you throw stone to slush its only you who is going to get dirty....wise men teachings.....do you understand that.
RE:nucleardeal
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:46 PM Permalink
He is one more beneficiary of congress policies so he knows where his loyalty should be.
Every body knows it very well that Manmohan Singh was the foreign agency mole in the Primw Ministers Office (PMO) during PV Narasimha Rao's Government. he is trying to achieve the final goal of capping the Indigenous Nuclear program of India, on behalf of USA and other Anti India forces, trying to tie India permanently to NPT indirectly. MMS knows very well that his time is up and after next election, he is history, since Congress has not even bothered to project him as PM.
He is trying to achieve that Goal he is assigned by his masters, put a cap on Indias indigenous nuclear program permanently, by what ever means. he knows, it is not possible, once this government goes out and he will be just forgotten.
In India, both Leftists and NDA should come together, they both have sincere policies for future of India and the billion masses. If they bury the outdated junk of secularism and communalism slogans, which has no meaning in a modern 21-st century society, they can make a strong coalition to rule India, for a long time, bringing long standing stability and prosperity.
RE:MMS is a traitor and Khalistan Agent, trying to put a stop to Indias indiginous nuclear program, supported by AntiIndia forces.
by Sastry on Jul 15, 2008 10:23 PM Permalink
I hope and wish you are wrong.
RE:MMS is a traitor and Khalistan Agent, trying to put a stop to Indias indiginous nuclear program, supported by AntiIndia forces.
by TheOneAndOnly on Jul 15, 2008 11:03 PM Permalink
The deal is good but the fact is we dont need it. The nuke deal is going to benefit US,Russia and France as they would sell reactors and technology....for countries like Australia they will benefit by selling uranium.....but for India we spend $80 billion and would be meet only additional 5-6% of energy needs that too the energy starts flowing only after 7-8 yrs from now.ITS GOOD BUT NOT WORTH IT.
Why dont the govt invest the money for hydro electric projects, thermal power projects and other alternative sources like wind energy and solar energy when we have such huge coal reserves. The whole world is moving towards that and we want to go the opposite direction. Only the politician will make a killing out of it by way of huge kick backs and what common man would get is electricity at very high prices and potentially unsafe spent fuel to deal with.
If nuke energy is so good then why hasnt US built a single new reactor in last 20 years and gone for other forms of energy generation for meeting needs?????
No point in fighting whether deal is good or bad, the question is whether it is worth it????
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:03 PM Permalink
Nuclear energy is in McCain's plan. US has abundant coal and coal mines are to be supported too. US does not need nuclear plants but when coal gets expensive and/or its environmental impact is unbearable, US will move to nuclear power too.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:12 PM Permalink
It's in his campaign ads ... you can watch them on youtube but illiterates like you will not understand them ... LOL
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:15 PM Permalink
Yes thats what I say people will always look and do what your grandpa in west will do. Go and lick there boots and be happy.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:01 PM Permalink
ok, you don't need it ... fine. you get yourself a gobar gas plant or take sanyaas from developed society which needs energy for survival and development. yes, you have a generator for your electric needs but the nation pays for oil import and will pay less for uranium import. Nuclear energy does not produce green house gases (carbon dioxide) and so is better for the enviroment.
where does maneka gandhi go, when the nation needs her?
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:08 PM Permalink
That the problem with people like you....always look west to see what is good rather having an independent view. You think having nuclear plants will make us developed nation.....GROW UP, we already have those.
For your knowledge Maneka Gandhi would be voting against the UPA.
RE:RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:15 PM Permalink
It is you who needs to GROW UP .... in your blind faith in BJP, you forget the national interest .... tomorrow, if BJP accepts the same agreement, ignorant people like you will be singing this agreement's praises ... you will call it a deal of the lifetime.
Maneka Gandhi should vote for the nuclear deal as it is environmentally friendly,
RE:RE:RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:17 PM Permalink
She doesnt need to consult you on what to do and what not. You sent your views to your grandpa McCain.
Do you knwo the stand of BJP without blabbering here.....read the last line of the article first.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:25 PM Permalink
BJP has no stand on any issue ... they are flip floppers .. tehy say one thing and then they change to another thing based on how they view and who they view as their vote bank
BJP plays vote bank politics ... they woo muslims while praising Jinnah while on visit to a country that sponsors terrorism in India.
They sent Kalam to rashtrapati bhawan in their attempt to woo muslims.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Rajendra Nayak on Jul 15, 2008 11:27 PM Permalink
15-07-2008 Hindustan Times has given as to how Uranium mines of jarkhand have been misused and abandoned. The ores are discarded causing pollution. They also point out that from the last two decades we have not done any activity to get Uranium from these mines and depending only on outsiders. So what is the matter and why are we purchasing from NSG or not utlizing but throwing our Uranium ores? All these are highly classified but HT has reported means it cannot be false. Atomic Energy Act of India has kept any matter relating to Atomic Energy not to be available to the public. It is highly secretive. Still then Hindustan Times have been able to get the truth or information abut non or underutilization of our Uranium. Not utilizing is a different issue than discarding because US and Russia are not utilizing their oil and they have huge reserve below their soil.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by kieran dsouza on Jul 15, 2008 11:55 PM Permalink
I think it is a rotten deal. We should exhaust all other alternative means for producing energy like biogas, wind energy, tidal wave energy from our vast coastline, biofuels from pongamia tree and jojoba shrub, solar energy etc. If our scientists could concentrate on using solar power to run a PC that would save a lot of energy. Also we should ban fuel inefficient cars. Unfortunately we don't have any worthy leaders today. only bootlickers.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by west on Jul 15, 2008 10:07 PM Permalink
i'll oppose any money directly invested towards country's development. why can't that money be shared among our political leaders, instead? it's them after all looking after the interest of the country. in the end, if they feel like donating some money out of their share, they can do so for the betterment of country - but first the country must make sure that our strong political leaders are happy. let's change the way our politics is done.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:13 PM Permalink
Isnt congress doing that too....loan waiver and appeasement policies are that not sharing the loot of public money instead of good governance.
RE:RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:22 PM Permalink
when farmers die or commit suicide, BJP blames govt. of not doing anything .. when their loans are waived, they again blame the govt.
so, all BJP wallahs do is blame the govt. BJP leadership has no solution but they are themselves part of the problem.
BJP will want to keep the nation backward ... b ut congress will take it ahead as it has done.
RE:Deal is good but we dont need it
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:27 PM Permalink
Good so is the congress going to send cheques to dead farmers. The fund should go to farmers in need and not a blanket waiver to all as if sharing a loot.
By the way have you ever paid a rupee as taxes to feel the pinch of money going waste.
Politics is the worst profession and politicians are nothing better than Criminals/rapists/goondas, with only few exception like Vajpayee, Manmohan singh, AK Antony, IK Gujral and some more. From today's politicians we cant expect any thing. But impartially I say BJP is a better party than any other party and will be better for India if they come to power in 2009.
RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 09:58 PM Permalink
why did you not include Sonia and Rahul Gandhi? what do you have against them?
Congress is a better party than BJP ... BJP plays divisive vote politics, communal politics and they use Hindus and their sentiments to their advantage.
RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Sastry on Jul 15, 2008 10:14 PM Permalink
Despite possible corruption in some BJP leaders, it is the best choice available to Hindustanis. Narendra Modi is one of the most competent leaders our country has ever produced.
RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Sastry on Jul 15, 2008 10:07 PM Permalink
Divisive? Yes if you mean dividing patriotic citizens from the traitors. Yes if you mean that the party highlights the truth about the vote bank politics of the congress. Communal? Yes. If your meaning of the word is to support slaughter of poor, old and unarmed piligrims to Amarnath temple. If standing by truth and facts are "communal", "divisive" etc. then this country requires many such parties.
RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:17 PM Permalink
they divide hindus and muslims ... they divide brahmins and baniya from shuddras and the rest.
BJPO has never protected anyone ... they only protect terrorists ... they even provide a caninet minister to escort them to safety.
RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Jul 15, 2008 10:19 PM Permalink
Wish your parents were on IC 814 then would have loved to see your response.
RE:RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Sastry on Jul 15, 2008 10:26 PM Permalink
Why his parents? If he were aboard that ill fated plane, he would have clearly understood the situation when Mufti's daughter was released by Congress and the situation in Kandahar.
RE:RE:RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:28 PM Permalink
Terrosits released to save Mufti's daughter were done on VP singh's request ... VP singh was in office with BJP support.
RE:BJP Vs Congress
by Loan Shark on Jul 15, 2008 10:27 PM Permalink
ha ha ha ... my parents ... you get personal when you have no argument ... bring my aprents in it .. LOL ... what a lowlife you are.
BJP negotiated with terorrists and gave in .. they shouldn't have negotiated and should not have given in ... the Indian military loses its people in catching those terrorists and then govt. releases them ... like the military losses are no losses at all ... only civilian lives count.
Myth #14: The deal is not primarily about making money; it is about creating a new U.S. strategic relationship in south Asia.
Fact: The deal is primarily about making money. The main effect of the deal will be to pardon India – to remove it as a violator of international norms. After such a change in status, there will be no impediment to U.S. arms sales. This is where the real money is, not in nuclear reactors. U.S. exporters have mentioned selling as much as $1.4 billion worth of Boeing airliners, hundreds of F-16 or F/A-18 fighter jets, as well as maritime surveillance planes, advanced radar, helicopters, missile defense and other equipment. The Russian press has even complained that the nuclear deal is a ploy to squeeze Russia out of the Indian arms market.
