RE:Reasons Why Modi will Never be PM of India
by Gourav Mathur on Jul 14, 2008 11:57 PM Permalink
Vedprakash Sharma = Pradeep Modi = Gaymodi all are the same person loser.........lolzzzzzz
RE:Reasons Why Modi will Never be PM of India
by prakash reddy on Jul 14, 2008 11:49 PM Permalink
better u also leave this platform like modi..........keyboard is lying and just typing .....
It is unlikely that Dr. APJ.Abdul Kalam supported the 2005 declaration allowing our country to be governed by another country-by enacting laws in the body of their elected representative.
RE:Unlikely -Kalam's support for the declaration 2005
by Gourav Mathur on Jul 14, 2008 11:57 PM Permalink
Vedprakash Sharma = Pradeep Modi = Gaymodi all are the same person loser.........lolzzzzzz
Lets start preparing list of bikau MPs. Boli lagana shuru ho chuka hai !!!
The the party which stays/comes to power will recover that money from businessmen by asking them to fund the elections else the government will have "pro-poor policies". Does that explain why the inflation is rising? Its because bikau MPs price is rising...
RE:Tol Mol ke Bol
by Anubhav Lal on Jul 14, 2008 11:19 PM Permalink
I can bet maximum bikau will be in BJP and the left. Congress will buy some BJP MPs and China has already bought the left.
Absolutely,there is no need to change his stance for a person like kalan who is upright,honest to the core with proven integrity which got reflected either as a scientist or as the one time first citizen of India.Where is the need for him.Arun Shoerie with all his journalistic knowledge should know that,still,there are people in this world who cannot be bought or influenced.And Kalam is above all petty politics;he is indomitable in his attitude and nature and does not care for any thing except for his conscience.Imputing motives to him is not at all in good tate -that too for persons like Arun showrie who perhaps,swayed by the need to support his party appears to have concocted such a story.Does he mean that he wanted to favour Congress which did not consider a second term for his presidentship despite his merit & deservedness?Did he not feel morally obligatory to support the stand of BJP which sponsored his name for the presidenship during its regime/in both the cases-"No"He is above all these petty & sundry politics.His sole intention is to do good to the nation which he served in several capacities including as country's first citizen.His opinion is objective whether it offends some one or benefits the other politically.Instead of feeling happy for such persons being amidst us to guide us in matters of paramount importance like this,it is unfortunate that people choose to hurl slanders against him.Being a man of fortitude,he, however,remains unperturbed for such things.
RE:No need for Kalam to change his stance
by awadh yadav on Jul 15, 2008 09:16 AM Permalink
hey guy here not only things who support you in past...... here thing only what right and wrong in the interest of our nation and indian peoples. In the case of bloody politician they only looking thir own benifits so please dont blam a such respected person because he never come influence of any party in past too only doing whats right thing
RE:No need for Kalam to change his stance
by rajesh prajapati on Jul 15, 2008 09:06 AM Permalink
So, do you actaually believe that Kalam changed his stand ? On his word ? Arun Shourie? An ex-journalist and a politician ? Do you think their word is believable ? And that too of the BJP ? They quote Jinnah when it suits them !!! Absolutely mischevious half truth propaganda by the BJP propaganda machine!
