Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 584 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Nuc deal
by sree kumar on Jul 11, 2008 10:54 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Being a person from Kerala, Worked with & against Communists and now being out of that state for ocupational reasons, I can listout some of the points.
(1) It is all anti-american propaganda. Still remembering Iraq, Vietnam & afgan- American image of global attacker is projected. Even in local Co-operative society elections America is the main theme. There are groups of people celebrated September 11. They (Mr.Karat & Co) described Mumbai blasts as anti American, attributed it for shift in our forign policy.Thus now they can justfy any more blasts and blame nuc deal.
(2) Inspite of open anti US stand, many of our comrades send their ELIGIBLE children to US &UK, One can quote many examples.
(3) Personaly I was also part of Anti computer agitation. That time we called it US secret weapon to convert billions of INDIANS unemployed. But now we have net in our party offices.
(4)I call Dr. MMS as the PM who has the most knowledge about India Govt Depts. Especialy Dept Of Atomic Energy. He was the finance controller for DAE.He knows how much money is eaten up in every equipment purchase. We get US/UK/EU made things by paying atleast five times as much as rest of the world do. Thus these middlemen should oppose nuk deal.
(5)Only cowards can talk about freedom.India with over 20 thousand staffs in Atomic energy, should have faith in ourselves to win the world. Rather than running away from it.
(6) it is not US but China dumping hazardeous waste in India. I wonder why our patriot

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Nuc deal
by rationalize on Jul 11, 2008 11:08 PM  Permalink
Very well said, Sree. Hopefully some commies can read your message with rational mind.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Time to wind up corrupt and arrogant congress
by IndiaForce India on Jul 11, 2008 10:54 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Sespite warnings and objections the arrogant congress guys are bent upon to do ilegitimate acts by pushing the deal withour taking people of india in to confidence and making entire text public.Shouting of congress agents wont make difrence to truth.People of india should wipe off congress from poltical scene of india for the good.The shamelss manner in which congress has started spiral of price rises and inflation and the manner in which money is being wasted and taken out from country is act of treason and grossly irresponsible act

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Time to wind up corrupt and arrogant congress
by All Right on Jul 11, 2008 10:57 PM  Permalink
The entire text of the deal is out in the open. How come you have formed an opinion without reading the text

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kudos to Dr.Singh
by kancham reddy on Jul 11, 2008 10:52 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

it's a daring act by our PM Dr.Manmohan Singh.this deal being the brain child of our PM,he took pains in getting it cleared by the coalition.it was good to get rid of the outdated ideology of the leftists who made thier living these 4years by blackmailing the PM.they even don't stand eligible to speak about persons of stature like Dr.singh.India remembers Dr.Singh for generations who is a highly qualified,great economic reformist,as the RBI Governer,Finance Minister under his mentor Late P.V.Narasimha Rao and finally the PM who dared the left parties.Every indian who konws Dr.Singh will have a high regard to his pleasing personality.Dr.Singh,We understand the coalition politics which handicapped you all these 4years,but a sinciere request is,PLZ do not run a parrallel government from 10,janpath.finally Dr.singh,today we are in the age of high technology,strong economy which are the fruits given by the then FM manmohan singh and the Late PM .P.V.Narasimha Rao.KUDOS TO YOU DR.Singh

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:kudos to Dr.Singh
by sony kalloor on Jul 11, 2008 10:59 PM  Permalink
Mr. Singh true Congress Man Power is a small price you would pay for stnding for National intrest.
Mrs Gandhi was killed by relegious fanatics because she tried to kill a man who trid to divide the country.
Mr. Rajiv was killed for he took a stand to protect India Intrest in Srilanka.
The relegious pervets of janasangh who were british spyes in the prision of andamans ..who tried to kill Mr. Gandhi.. who retured from pakistan. who promotes the non tax paying rich class across rajestan and gujarat will keep making noises

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Welldone
by Sanjay Enselvan on Jul 11, 2008 10:45 PM  Permalink 

I am not a supporter of congress-but I will totally support them here for their vision in this case.Sorry Advaniji-you are not being sensible and won't be respected if you speak of politics when you mention of deal.History will not excuse you of this mistake-this is from a staunch BJP supporter.You need to be smart like Chandra Babu Naidu who chose to keep silent after he was aware of deals benefits.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
IAEA Agreement
by AK on Jul 11, 2008 10:41 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I have gone through part of the agreement and so far I find that it has nothing that is against Indian interests. I will quote the following lines:

“WHEREAS India is desirous of further expanding cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (hereinafter referred to as “the Agency”) and its Member States

“To identify and separate its civilian and military nuclear facilities and programmes in a phased manner;

“...for India to obtain access to the international fuel market, including reliable, uninterrupted and continuous access to fuel supplies from companies in several nations, as well as support for an Indian effort to develop a strategic reserve of nuclear fuel to guard against any disruption of supply over the lifetime of India’s reactors;

“5.      ...the Agency shall implement safeguards in a manner designed to avoid hampering India’s economic or technological development, and not to hinder or otherwise interfere with any activities involving the use by India of nuclear material, non-nuclear material, equipment, components, information or technology produced, acquired or developed by India independent of this Agreement for its own purposes.

“7.      ...the Agency shall take every precaution to protect commercial and industrial secrets

“14. (a)      India, on the basis of its sole determination, shall notify the Agency in writing of its decision to offer for Agency safeguards a facility identified by India in the Declaration referred to in paragraph 13,”

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:IAEA Agreement
by AK on Jul 11, 2008 10:43 PM  Permalink
However Clasue 10 troubles me.

“10.      ...Nothing in this Agreement shall affect other rights and obligations of India under international law.

Since India does not have any rights under the International Laws as it is not a signee to the NPT, what rights it is talking about.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:IAEA Agreement
by sony kalloor on Jul 11, 2008 10:44 PM  Permalink
Thank You AK .. good to se you amoung the political perverts and Pakistan returned hindus party members

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:IAEA Agreement
by AK on Jul 11, 2008 10:49 PM  Permalink
How would you know? You probably did not understand a single word in the above text.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:IAEA Agreement
by sibby mathews on Jul 11, 2008 10:55 PM  Permalink
Oh, not so fast, friend. Surely, you are not implying that the deal's text is so deep an intellectual effort that one would need 'supreme intellect' to interpret it ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:IAEA Agreement
by AK on Jul 11, 2008 11:01 PM  Permalink
I am referring to Sony Kalloor who thinks I am ....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:IAEA Agreement
by AK on Jul 11, 2008 10:47 PM  Permalink
Even after this agreement is signed, India has to decide when to make this agreement effective. Only when it starts acquiring supplies this agreement becomes effective.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Process of making history
by amol chavdhari on Jul 11, 2008 10:39 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Yes Yes ....Its very true.

Congress is very soon gona be washed from the country. Bahut paisa khaya..now just get lost.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Process of making history
by Guest on Jul 11, 2008 11:14 PM  Permalink
Listen kid, I guess it was BJP and its bunch of dogs who made money on soldiers coffin. So better not speak.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Debate IAEA Agreement
by AK on Jul 11, 2008 10:38 PM  Permalink 

Forum should be used to discuss issues before it is implemented rather than venting our own personal beliefs. Lot of statements are Name Calling. My thoughts.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jai chand and Mir Jafir also made history
by Sameer on Jul 11, 2008 10:37 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies



by seelling India.

C'mon MMS, there is no glory is selling your country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Jai chand and Mir Jafir also made history
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 11, 2008 10:55 PM  Permalink
Sameer,

Now AB Vajpayee's and NDA's National Security Advisor, Brijesh Mishra has come out in suppot of N-Deal saying even B(ad) J(oker) Party was not able to get such favorable terms when they were negotiating on behalf of NDA. USamanta and other knickerwalas apologists like Ravan Raj and yourself should now lick their vomit which they have putting in rediff. Alternatively, they can drown themselves in their vomit.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jai chand and Mir Jafir also made history
by Sameer on Jul 11, 2008 10:59 PM  Permalink
even if I were to believe you ( which is difficult given your mindless diatribe against everyone on this forum), I submit that India is in a much better bargaining position as compared to 1998. A deal is all about balancing what you wish and what you can get--this deal would have been good in 1970 but in 2008, it is a sell out.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Can the Hindu perverts say why is the deal Bad.
by sony kalloor on Jul 11, 2008 10:35 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

1. they get 49% reservation in India in the name of SC /ST/ OBC etc and blame the country is pampering Minorities.

2. They Dont have power to support the starving Nation, and just because learned English says We do not need Deal . Can You Say Why No deal

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Can the Hindu perverts say why is the deal Bad.
by Sameer on Jul 11, 2008 10:40 PM  Permalink
b'cos there is no need for it. It ties India in so many ways. Nuclear energy is not a viable option for India for so many reasons, cost, security, nonavailability of fuel, problems with nuclear waste disposal, cost of decommisioning of the plant, intrusive inspections, and most importantly MMS and Sonia have shown that INDIA IS FOR SALE.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
What is a deal
by Sam Nath on Jul 11, 2008 10:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Is there anytime Congress made a good deal in their ruling? Division of country, not joining Security council, Tibet issue, now the Nepal issue, the deal with Afzal, it keeps on going. So, we should not trust Congress looking their track record. Even Rahul also get to open his mouth. Good luck citizens.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by !Maximus! on Jul 11, 2008 10:31 PM  Permalink

When was the best ruling happend, according to you? Who was the PM & which party ruled then, according to you?? Just for knowledge sake

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by Sathish N on Jul 11, 2008 10:35 PM  Permalink
You are not here for knowledge sake. You are here to put your finger in other's as s.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by !Maximus! on Jul 11, 2008 10:39 PM  Permalink

See... you dont have any logical argument and eventually you showed YOUR CLASS. Probably thats what you do, is it????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by Sathish N on Jul 11, 2008 10:45 PM  Permalink
Logical question has been posed so many times, but you do not have an answer for that. You guys can only personal to avoid that question.

US President can withdraw nuclear fuel arbitrarily. This will impinge on India's sovereignty. Why should we sign such a deal?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by !Maximus! on Jul 11, 2008 10:52 PM  Permalink

How are we aquiring the fuel now without the deal??? Who is supplying it???

And well, I appreciate you finally resorted to some sensible arguement without sounding crap.


Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:What is a deal
by Sam Nath on Jul 11, 2008 10:38 PM  Permalink
No one from Congress in their dynastic rule of 50 years. Bajpayee was good but it was very short time to fix 50 years of problems that was left by Congy.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by Arumugham on Jul 11, 2008 10:37 PM  Permalink
HAS THE UPA DONE ANYTHING FOR THE MAJORITY, THAT IS, HINDUS. ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT MINORITIES. THAT TOO ONLY TALKING. ONE OPPORTUNITY TO ALLOT LAND FOR MARNATH HINDU YATHRIS ALSO VERY DIPLOMATICALLY PREVENTED BY CONGRESS DRAMA. SAME KEENNESS WAS NOT SHOWN BY CONGRESS IN THAT ISSUE. CITIZENS REMEMBER.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by sony kalloor on Jul 11, 2008 10:42 PM  Permalink
Majorty Gets 49% revation in the country for Jobs and Education what else thay wants . earn and work not by begging the money the Minorities pay as tax. On Top of it tell me any gujju or marvadi who pays taxes

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by Nitin Karwa on Jul 11, 2008 11:15 PM  Permalink
well said! I am a marwari and am ashamed to say that they are the biggest tax evaders. Most businessman are actually economic terrorists in India. India's problem is poverty and the marwaris and gujju are the main culprits. Eg. Before independence Bihar was a land of learned people. Then marwaris went there, exploited and made biharis beggers. Soon many of the poor became criminals to get their rights. Same with Assam and Bengal. Now Assamese demand all marwaris to leave assam.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by sony kalloor on Jul 11, 2008 10:29 PM  Permalink
WHAT ARE U TRYING TO SAY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is a deal
by Sam Nath on Jul 11, 2008 10:35 PM  Permalink
Dude, the message is very simple. Dont trust Congress. Got it!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 584 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message