People should know that the kalam is an aeronautical engineer. He was a respectable president and now respected ex president. but he is a fake nuke scientist. It is unethical to comment/ tell as like a nuclear scientist. he should have told sorry and told to ask nuke scientist. Nuke scientist will their own dreams about their profession in india. common man can express their view on any matter but a engineering professional should not interfere other profession business. Please read Engineering Ethics principles. (book: Ethics In Engineering: Mike Martin, Roland Schinzinger TMH publication) It is very unfortunate to make such a comment on kalam. Professional society can punish him. no exited comment please before reading Engineering professional socitey code of conduct or the book
Mulla Mulayam and aamir singh (pseudo secularists) understood the nuclear deal in an hour or so and agreed to support the UPA. I think we should consult them henceforth. Dirty pro-islam politics played by these idiots who know nothing about development, education and progress. They spend half of their life in Mumbai partying with actresses and send more their UPietes all over India by not developing their own home states. SHAME ON UP AND THE MUSLIMS FOR ENCOURAGING SUCH FOOLS
The draft of the agreement should have been circulated among the scientific community and their opinion taken particularly regarding our National Interest. A national Consesus should have been created before going ahead with the agreement. This hush hush way of dealing with the agreement of national interest is beyond ones understanding. shanker
What happened to all who have said it is good for India - pls contradict the scintists!!! Or where they saying without reading the fine print. I have no capability or knowledge to say for or against this but yes I am curious to know how much good or bad is it for India in the future? Can somebody put down the pros and con for lay persons like me
RE:What happened to all who have said it is good for India - pls contradict the scintists!!!
by desacretes on Jul 10, 2008 04:35 PM Permalink
got it dear,please read yourself the document
RE:What happened to all who have said it is good for India - pls contradict the scintists!!!
by Nandakumar M on Jul 10, 2008 04:54 PM Permalink
I read the document, there is no mention of India's weapon status. It acknowledges India having nuclear technology but not as a Nuclear weapon state. Read yourself the document but properly. Legal terms should be read in fine print without any assumptions.
RE:What happened to all who have said it is good for India - pls contradict the scintists!!!
by rajiv mahajan on Jul 10, 2008 04:38 PM Permalink
These communist scientists should not be quoted by Rediff as 'the scientists'. India's nuclear isolation needs to be undone & that is what this deal is achieving.
Supply of Nuclear fuel will stop if India resumes testing of nuclear weapons.
Read the below"
Ashley Tellis of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a former Bush administration official and proponent of the deal, said fears of another Indian nuclear weapons test were theoretical and India had too much to risk by testing.
"With the investments that they have made in this deal, the incentives not to test actually grow," he said.
"If India tests in the future, it will not be the first to test. It will test most likely in response to somebody else testing," added Tellis.
RE:RE:Nuclear Deal - Capping further Indian tests
by wild monkey on Jul 10, 2008 04:52 PM Permalink
It is true. suppose our neighbor make a test reduce the morality of the indian people. then political pressure will come to test. Is there any assurance from out neighbor that they wont make tests
I can understand why Dr. MMS found the principle behind the Indo-US Deal attractive. He has done the right thing by pursuing this Deal. BUT, now that the details are emerging, Dr.MMS and the UPA must spend MORE TIME in negotiations to CLARIFY matters vital for India. No harm in getting the Deal passed in the next US Administration. India must NOT rush itself.
There is a danger that India would be caught in much legal wranglings with both the USA and IAEA - unless it takes time to CLARIFY the points that these learned scientists have raised in the main essay.
RE:Good in Principle but BAD in details.
by deepak yadav on Jul 10, 2008 04:49 PM Permalink
We have DRDO, ISRO, ATOMIC Energy depts..with thosands of Nuclear scientist..there is the recommendation of APJ kalam for the agreement...do u think these 3 scientist's words has any importance...only limelight propaganda
