It is over 4 years this govt is in power. BJP was main opposition party. Bhut in last 4 years how many times BJP attended parliament sessions??? Any idea??? Not many!!!!
They have been disrupting parliament over many unwanted unncesary things all last 4 years. Now they want emergency session!!! That too to backstab Indias national interests!! Big losers! and no ashamed at all!! what kind of party is this???
RE:Can any Mullah explain?
by Majed Ali on Jul 10, 2008 07:53 AM Permalink
So you are refering to muslims as mulla. Ok. No probs. I wont refer to each hindu as bajrangi or sanghi.
As a Indian and as a muslim I have no opposition to the deal. It should go ahead. Last I heard was that BJP was opposing this deal. Now you should as them why afterall some people consider them to be nationalist.
The land for the shrine is a right that hindus should get. I have not seen any protest in the rest of India by muslims. Infact there have been voices of support from certain muslim quraters for the land to be alloted.
BJP was in power for a long time, they should have scrapeed 370. If you give special treatment to a particular state you are not going to get into trouble. So if BJP comes to power next time lets hope they do so. But its highly unlikely given the political situation.
If you can prove that singing vande mataram alone can make one patriotic then I am ready to sing it. But when I have a choice to balance between the principle of my religion to worship one God and love my country I choose the balanced option. Jana gana mana and sare jahan se accha both instill the same patriotic feeling in me as vande mataram in you. Its about feeling.
A hindu can sing vande mataram a million times but he becomes unpatriotic when he accepts a bribe. A muslim can sing other national songs and be patriotic if he denies bribe and remains loyal to the cause of country.
RE:Can any Mullah explain?
by Majed Ali on Jul 10, 2008 07:55 AM Permalink
correction to one para:
BJP was in power for a long time, they should have scrapeed 370. If you give special treatment to a particular state you are going to get into trouble. So if BJP comes to power next time lets hope they do so. But its highly unlikely given the political situation
RE:Can any Mullah explain?
by Srikanth on Jul 10, 2008 11:27 AM Permalink
Don't paint relgious thing on N-deal as no community is opposing this deal. And lot of Islamic organizations are supporting this deal. The political parties like commies are indirectly hurting muslims by saying Muslims are opposing and none of them are. Don't paint them like this and don't disintegrate anyone from national mainstream.
... doing the household chores, arranging her hair, making tea, talking about the greatness of womanhood, disapproving anti-Conversion bills and just being blissfully ignorant! she just has no time as President!
RE:Advani
by kabir on Jul 09, 2008 11:59 PM Permalink
u guys are not using ur own mind dnt u think tht all these s--tpd political and religious leaders are make u and my type of coman peoples fool by there political; lectures. they are not intrested in making our nation a prograssive nation. BJP is aganist Congress , congress is aganist bjp.. all parties want to take controll of PM Chair . and all leaders want PM chair. no matter where they from BJP, UPA, Bajrangdal, akalidal etc. all have one motive of PM Chair. and we fool are just running behind their one political lecture.......... this is the fact nothing els. no common muslim want to kill hindus and no common hindu want to kill muslim and have any religious right to kill. killing is done by only our political religious leader they want support from their community tht's y are are blaming on other community.............they are peise of s--hit
RE:Advani
by Krishnan Hariharan on Jul 09, 2008 11:31 PM Permalink
Hindus are also desperate to see the Congress, the Commies, the pseudo-secularists, Pratibha Patil and all the people who are anti-National and anti-Hindu routed and be rewarded ignominy for their injustice and cunningness!
Many people here opposes the loan waiver for farmers by Manmohan Singh. If we neglect agriculture we loose significance in the world. Thereby, economic strength will be lost. We have already experienced scarcity of wheat in the past and today or tomorrow the same problem may be faced by rice. In the name of Special Economic Zones, we are patronising industrialists who are offering very few jobs to the local youth. Instead, they are reaping benefits in the name of tax holidays. Thanks to Manmohan Singh for his great service to the poor farmer by waiving Rs 72 crore loans, for Rural Employment Guarantee Act which ensures employment guarantee, food at reasonable price despite inflation, conveyance to rural people to the place of work. People say that whatever financial support you may give the farmer, but he doesn’t survive without a private loan. Whatever be the truth, agriculture and agriculturists both must be protected for the food security. Food security and energy needs both are inter-related. Bio fuel demands for agriculture produce, farmers changes crop pattern as per the market trend and less land will be available for the food grain production. Thats the reason we want this deal and government.
RE:Message from Farmer
by rajkiran on Jul 10, 2008 05:57 AM Permalink
We all know the importance of agri and hence oppose the loan waiver. loan waiver will reduce availability of loans in future due to increased NPA; it leads to greater fiscal deficit and hence inflation; the same amount used for waiver shd 've been used for building irrigational facilities; cold storage; .. .and agri is a high-risk sector in india and cant be in hands of ppl who cant take the risk...or at least they shd be insured against crop failures using this money but not waiver.
Alright Surdee.. now that you have already shown the people that you have a spine, people were talking you are a grass eating Tiger, but looks like somebody mixed some mutton in your grass. People were saying you slept 4 1/2 years with your eyes open, people call you puppet, Italian's pomerian, dhobhi ka ku..tt..aa whatever whatever but Now that Maulana Mulayam and the King Pim.p Amar Singh are already in the scene and all your congresee Friends have already bought several houses in Gurgaon, Now please leave us alone
RE:ooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
by All Right on Jul 09, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
Comrades have dug a pit. And Sahadeven of course you know the old adage of falling into pits dug by themselves!
RE:ooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
by Krishnan Hariharan on Jul 09, 2008 11:43 PM Permalink
this sahadevan is a commie and not a Pandava, he is shakuni in the pandava team... needs to be weeded out!
Congress is fooling the public that time is running out. It can be signed even after bush regime. But congress want to divert the attention of people from inflation, afzal guru issue, terrorism issue etc.
RE:congress wants to avoid the real problem
by All Right on Jul 09, 2008 11:10 PM Permalink
Is it possible for the deal with the same or better conditions to be signed after Bush's departure from Office? Sure it is possible.
How probable is for the deal with the same or better conditions to be signed after Bush's departure from Office? Low probability.
The first instance, Bush is a co-author the deal so he has the extra motivation to use his clout.
Secondly Obama has strong convictions against the deal. He made several amendments to the Hyde Act. He is expected to win by a landslide. Being the first African-American to be the President, he exudes charisma, comparable to Bill Clinton or John Kenndy. So he would be a much stronger President and he would impose much toughter conditions than a weak Bush. More over Democrats relative to Republicans are more hawkish on nuclear proliferation.
So our best bet lies with Bush. Advani's claims that he will re-negotiate the terms of the agreement are just gas - fully knowing that he is destined to lose.
RE:congress wants to avoid the real problem
by satyarthi on Jul 09, 2008 11:18 PM Permalink
There may be many 'ifs and buts', but one thing is certain, as and when India needs, it will get several such offers. Just 20 years back, we had to depend upon one source for supply of 'fighter plane'. Today, every body is in the queue. The political hype of this deal is created by Congress and REDs.
RE:congress wants to avoid the real problem
by shailendra lande on Jul 09, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
Many people here opposes the loan waiver for farmers by Manmohan Singh. If we neglect agriculture we loose significance in the world. Thereby, economic strength will be lost. We have already experienced scarcity of wheat in the past and today or tomorrow the same problem may be faced by rice. In the name of Special Economic Zones, we are patronising industrialists who are offering very few jobs to the local youth. Instead, they are reaping benefits in the name of tax holidays. Thanks to Manmohan Singh for his great service to the poor farmer by waiving Rs 72 crore loans, for Rural Employment Guarantee Act which ensures employment guarantee, food at reasonable price despite inflation, conveyance to rural people to the place of work. People say that whatever financial support you may give the farmer, but he doesn’t survive without a private loan. Whatever be the truth, agriculture and agriculturists both must be protected for the food security. Food security and energy needs both are inter-related. Bio fuel demands for agriculture produce, farmers changes crop pattern as per the market trend and less land will be available for the food grain production. Thats the reason we want this deal and government.
RE:congress wants to avoid the real problem
by satyarthi on Jul 09, 2008 11:02 PM Permalink
Correct. In a way it has succeeded in its scheme with the help of REDs.
