RE:Adduji no chance
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 03:58 PM Permalink
How we will live?? Last few months I watched Rediff board & saw mudsliding,hatred accross the board each other(Hindu to Muslim,Muslim to Hindu)!!! Sabke jahen me itna jaher kaun ghol diya?? Kaise jiyenge hum log is nafrat ke beech??? Inme se koi agar police inspector banega to kya hoga opponent ka??Koi Politician banega to kya haal hoga is desh ka???Koi Minister banega to kya karega wow opponent ka??? I think I will be mad think about it!! What's our futures?? Dilo dimag me itna jaher kaise paida hua,kisine paida kiya,GOD knows !! I request to Rediff pls close this discussion board!!Dont giv any chance to anybody spread hatred!!! Humare desh me lakho samasya hai ,garibi,unemployee,dowri,ek bhi discussion yaha par nahi hote !!Yaha sirf ek dushre ko nicha dekhane ke liye kitna gir sakte hai gir rahe hai!! Ya Rab,Ya Malik ,Ya Allah sab ko sumati de!!
RE:Adduji Aapka sapna kabhi pure nahi honge!!!!
by Ravan Raj on Jul 08, 2008 04:04 PM Permalink
Shaikh, pray to god everyday.sometime he may here your jihadi words.But you minorities cannot even guess a BJP govt.bcaz.... (eg: SIMI changed its operation from Karnataka after election)
RE:RE:Adduji Aapka sapna kabhi pure nahi honge!!!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 04:08 PM Permalink
Shanti Bhushan and Ram Jethamalani came to attend the launch of the party. Vajpayee was made the working president. The lotus was selected as the party symbol because it represents Hindu ethos. It's a holy symbol. Everyone in rural India understands what it stands for. It is symbolic: It blooms in dirty waters but it is pure in itself. Like the lotus, we thought we will be in politics but we will be not be mired in the corruption around us. Then, in Bandra [a western suburb of Mumbai] we held an all-India conclave and we named it Samata Nagar. About 55,000 workers came to Mumbai. They had great enthusiasm. We had five kitchens with five types of Indian cuisine. The ambience was so simple. We spent Rs 60 lakh [Rs 6 million], most of which we collected by selling coupons. There were very few big donators; people didn't donate much because we had broken away from the Janata Party and no one saw a future for our party. There were no Ambanis lining up to fund the party.
RE:RE:RE:Adduji Aapka sapna kabhi pure nahi honge!!!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 04:08 PM Permalink
Vajpayee was accommodated at party leader Vedprakash Goyal's home and Advani stayed with his relative in Mumbai. Most leaders camped on the ground itself. Simple living and high thinking was our motto. At that time too, there was a heated debate over who should be the first president of the BJP. To many of us, Vajpayee's commitment to Hindutva was a little feeble. During the Janata rule, when he was a minister, he had written an article criticizing the RSS' approach to national issues. But there was no alternative to Vajpayee. He was the most popular face of the party and a great orator. There was a conclave within the BJP in consultation with the RSS, to decide the party president. At that time, the core group of the newly formed BJP consisted of Vajpayee, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia, Advani, Kushabhau Thakre, Jaganthrao Joshi, Sunder Singh Bhandari and J P Mathur. Nanaji Deshmukh, though he was outside politics, was an important leader. Sikander Bakht was a senior leader whom the party had given a special status to. Like Madandas Devi is the interface today between the BJP and the RSS, Bhaurao Deoras, brother of then RSS chief Balasaheb Deoras, was mediating between the newly formed party and its parent body. Just as Sushma Swaraj was considered for the party top post to counter Sonia Gandhi, the Rajmata was then considered for president to pit her against Indira Gandhi. But we were wary of allegations of feudalism. So, the core group dropped her name. Advani was n
RE:Adduji Aapka sapna kabhi pure nahi honge!!!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 03:59 PM Permalink
In 1994, expelled Bharatiya Janata Party leader Madhu Deolekar wrote an essay, saying the BJP was infected with groupism, corruption and indiscipline -- just like the Congress. Deolekar -- who has been with the Rashtriya Swaymsevak Sangh since 1945 and was its pracharak in Kutch, Gujarat -- is what can be called a hardcore Hindutva hawk. He was a member of the Jana Sangh from 1952 and was a member of legislative council in Maharashtra from 1978 to 1988. When the BJP was formed in 1980, he was the party's general secretary in Mumbai. With the rise of Pramod Mahajan and after the BJP's alliance with the Shiv Sena, old-timers like Deolekar became redundant for the party. Although BJP leaders have forgotten him and dismiss his views as the voice of a frustrated old man, RSS supremo K Sudarshan still calls on Deolekar.
RE:RE:Adduji Aapka sapna kabhi pure nahi honge!!!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 03:59 PM Permalink
Recently, the RSS chief visited Deolekar's home in Khar, a western suburb of Mumbai, to consult on ways of celebrating RSS founder Madhav Sadashiv Golvalkar's centenary anniversary, which began on December 11. Today, Deolekar is in pain because he sees the "vichar shakti [ideological strength]" behind the birth of the BJP fading before his eyes. As India's main Opposition party celebrates 25 years of its existence, rediff.com revisits an old BJP man who is of no use to the party. Over to him: In 1980, we were all in the Janata Party. I was its public relations officer in Mumbai. On the issue of dual membership, the Jana Sangh constituent of the Janata party decided to break away. Socialist members of the Janata Party wanted Jana Sangh members to completely disassociate themselves from the RSS. Their idea was that once the Jana Sangh severs ties with the RSS, it would also lose grassroot support and be at the mercy of socialists. But RSS leaders, BJP leaders and workers of the Sangh Parivar -- everyone -- thought it was time to break away because the Janata Party had no future. The ethos behind founding the BJP was the RSS ideology of Hindutva.
RE:RE:RE:Adduji Aapka sapna kabhi pure nahi honge!!!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 04:00 PM Permalink
We had five commitments. First, we wanted to practise politics to push for our idea of cultural nationalism, which also included the strong belief that India will not give away an inch of territory and will protect its borders. We needed unity within India to ensure that. The RSS was never overtly religious -- it never asked its members to go to the temple or perform pujas or fast. Our idea of religion was nationalism. We believed in matrubhoomi [Motherland] and Bharatmata [Mother India]. We asked our cadres to believe in heroes of the nation like Lord Ram, Lord Krishna, Sri Aurobindo, Lokmanya Tilak and Ramakrishna Paramhans. To some extent Gandhiji -- we believed and admired Gandhi's belief in grassroot-level activism. Second, we thought in 1980 that unlike Congress, ours would be value-based politics. Third, we were committed to democracy. Fourth, the BJP believed in positive secularism. And fifth, we wanted to break caste barriers and establish samata [equality] in Indian society. In May 1980, the BJP was born in New Delhi where its name and symbol was decided.
The BJP (or shall I say LK Advani), I think, is breaking its own heart in hot anticipation. First, it called for a confidence vote when the left still had not withdrawn support. Now again they say that a minority govt has no right to execute any binding international agreement. Has the withdrawal of support become so mouth watering for the BJP that it forgot to fact that it would take time for entering into an agreement. The govt also legally gets time to prove its majority, or otherwise.
RE:Heart-breaking wait
by san df on Jul 08, 2008 05:14 PM Permalink
this nation needs ppl like abu faisal who doesnt see evrything thro the prism of religion. secularism must survive for ppl like u and not for extremists who wants to spread their religion to go to heaven.
RE:Heart-breaking wait
by Abdullah Saikh on Jul 08, 2008 04:00 PM Permalink
Shanti Bhushan and Ram Jethamalani came to attend the launch of the party. Vajpayee was made the working president. The lotus was selected as the party symbol because it represents Hindu ethos. It's a holy symbol. Everyone in rural India understands what it stands for. It is symbolic: It blooms in dirty waters but it is pure in itself. Like the lotus, we thought we will be in politics but we will be not be mired in the corruption around us. Then, in Bandra [a western suburb of Mumbai] we held an all-India conclave and we named it Samata Nagar. About 55,000 workers came to Mumbai. They had great enthusiasm. We had five kitchens with five types of Indian cuisine. The ambience was so simple. We spent Rs 60 lakh [Rs 6 million], most of which we collected by selling coupons. There were very few big donators; people didn't donate much because we had broken away from the Janata Party and no one saw a future for our party. There were no Ambanis lining up to fund the party.
RE:Heart-breaking wait
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 08, 2008 03:57 PM Permalink
82 year old budhuvoo is in an indecent hurry to becom PM instead of PM in waiting (for ever). Since his one foot is already in Jinnah's grave, the time is running out for him. Jaswant Singh has got his begging bowl ready to pleadwith Jayalalitha, Mamata, Mayawatis of India. Prakash Karat is next in line for begging mission.
RE:Heart-breaking wait
by RAJ on Jul 08, 2008 03:59 PM Permalink
I would like to see one Indian with a Christian name who bothers about nationalist interest and not Madam's interest.
RE:Heart-breaking wait
by Ravan Raj on Jul 08, 2008 04:01 PM Permalink
I am noticing this forum for a long time.All muslim names are supprting congress or SP,BSP.. but opposes N-deal in this forum and most christian names are heavly favoring all the acts of soniya gandhi.May be secularisam
RE:Heart-breaking wait
by mahabodhi on Jul 08, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
@abu faishal India indeed needs good Muslims like you !We pray to allah that ur childern also be good muslims and ur family meners be also good muslims !Ur brother in laws-sistar in laws also be good muslims !We really need good muslim like you !
The American Educated ( i am nothing against American education) Man Mohan-Chidambram-Kamalnath-Montek team is all bent to do all they can to please US. They are selling India piece by piece in the name of Nuclear energy and they are well aware that, as long as the corrupt English media support them, the middle class also salute them.
1. We need to increase our R&D spending as developed nations are doing for innovative systems in Energy proiduction. 2. The investment in R&D from US companies for greene enrgy will be in the tune of 3.4 trillion $ in the comning 5 years as per IES
Obama is all for support of such initiatives and he has been backed by companies like Google in this regard.
RE:Selling India in the name of Energy
by VinayBabu Ravuri on Jul 08, 2008 03:47 PM Permalink
Nuclear power generation is a non-polluting form and if u want to put money on R&D now on solar and wind and expect power from that.. may be our great grandsons will be enjoying the power so generated if the earth exists till then coz of green house gases generated from fossil fuels.
RE:Selling India in the name of Energy
by RAJ on Jul 08, 2008 03:52 PM Permalink
Exactly, we have alwways been short sighted creatures, we dont wanna look forward and work hard on new scientific developments and because of this we will always be beggers like this.
Who stopped us from investing in Wind power, Hydropwer with so much of natural resources we have?
And all this Drama what we will be achiveing maximun 8% of our energy needs in another 10 years? How will we get the rest 92% unless we look beyond this nuclear energy.
RE:Selling India in the name of Energy
by arun patwardhan on Jul 08, 2008 04:01 PM Permalink
Think of 1% of current needs coming from hydel energy of Narmada dam.. Think if we build such 8 dams to substitute N-Deal, how many generation it will take to realize. The N-Deal is 30 years only.
india cannot be sold for nuclear , if you dont get raw material from 45 producing countries, it is shame because when 45 countries are able to supply materials then what is your tech, you are below 45 countries , common your science and tech what they are doing, in high tech labs stops quota and bring intelligence to do something for the future, you are now depends raw material for supply ,and they will inspect and if you produce bombs and they put bombsonthat , we will become like irag, no no we dont want , we are having good human capital spend money on research, do inventions and discoveries, we are not only capable of back office work, we should also do some scientific work, there is no end for buying, stop this nonsense we dont want to be slave to the countries who are all supplying
RE:Nuclear
by VinayBabu Ravuri on Jul 08, 2008 03:43 PM Permalink
come out of pessimism. Uranium and petrol are natural resources and can't be manufactured atleast for now.
RE:Nuclear
by RAJ on Jul 08, 2008 03:44 PM Permalink
Yes we are short sighted creatures, we dont wann look forward and work hard on new scientific developments and because of this we will always be beggers like this .
RE:Nuclear
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 08, 2008 03:47 PM Permalink
Continue to be a begger,Raj. Do not include others in your proffesion. If you need a begging bowl, ask Jaswant Singh.He is getting one ready to go to Prakash Karat to ask for a chance for 82 year old budhuvoo PM.
RE:Nuclear
by arun patwardhan on Jul 08, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
Ram bhi aur Krishana bhi hai phir bhi aap narak ( hell) ke baare mein soch rahe ho?
Do you believe that that we are above 45 NSG nations if we do not go for N-Deal. It is better to have NSG group commanding our power than draining FOREX by OPEC for oil.
Its better to have readymade technology than spending on research when the politicians are there to graze the curreny notes. Despite scholars coming from WB ( e.g. Amartya Sen) teh state is on downward path of so called economy. Before commenting on Self developing teh technology think of Tata's NANo plant. Its self development by India, yet the WB politicians are working hard for own gains that delievring teh research to country's benefit.
RE:Nuclear
by Samir Moosa on Jul 08, 2008 04:02 PM Permalink
You are right. In the past nearly 2000 years, Indians have not made any significant invention. The only 2 Indian researchers who have received a Noble Prize since its inception are C.V. Raman and Amartya Sen. Rabindranath Tagore (British Indian) got the NP for a literary masterpiece. If there is a dearth of intelligence, than we should use talent like Dhirubhai said "copy well". That will atleast take us on the development path. Dhirubhai did it. So should all of us.
RE:RE:Nuclear
by arun patwardhan on Jul 08, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
Ram bhi aur Krishana bhi hai phir bhi aap narak ( hell) ke baare mein soch rahe ho?
Do you believe that that we are above 45 NSG nations if we do not go for N-Deal. It is better to have NSG group commanding our power than draining FOREX by OPEC for oil.
Its better to have readymade technology than spending on research when the politicians are there to graze the curreny notes. Despite scholars coming from WB ( e.g. Amartya Sen) teh state is on downward path of so called economy. Before commenting on Self developing teh technology think of Tata's NANo plant. Its self development by India, yet the WB politicians are working hard for own gains that delievring teh research to country's benefit.
RE:LK Advani - The biggest terrorist India has ever seen
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 08, 2008 03:42 PM Permalink
He will now plead with left to allow him to become PM. Jaswant Singh is meeting Prakash Karat today evening with folded hands on bended knees. Hail Jinnah of India.
RE:LK Advani - The biggest terrorist India has ever seen
by Jaiganesh on Jul 08, 2008 04:10 PM Permalink
he terrorises terroists, so he should be the biggest terrorist of all thanks for the complement.
Today we are reeling under Oil shock as it is all imported, tomorrow the Uranium will go up and we will end up paying high prices. The government is not showing any interest in developing WIND/SOLAR energy. The nuclear deal will bring bribes worth billions to leaders.
RE:Why not SOLAR/WIND energy
by VinayBabu Ravuri on Jul 08, 2008 03:41 PM Permalink
Uranium is not like oil where u've to import it everyday. It's a one time transfer and that uranium is used for years n decades together.
RE:Why not SOLAR/WIND energy
by arun patwardhan on Jul 08, 2008 03:42 PM Permalink
So be it !!! if you are so sure on prediction.. Atleast teh common person can think of real electricity to his home atleast for few hours..
Its better to have unequal distribution of welath than distriuting poverty equally. (What we have seen in 30 years rule in in WB).
RE:Nuclear
by arun patwardhan on Jul 08, 2008 03:54 PM Permalink
Are you guys blind to read the text after 1998 blasts! Prez Kalam and PM AB Vajpayi tod that we do not need physical explosion again, we can simulate the tests if needed. With 1998 test it is concluded by world that We have tried not only Fission but fusion device too! Fo and reda the archives of 1998 May till July
RE:Nuclear
by RAJ on Jul 08, 2008 03:33 PM Permalink
Is America ready to stop its own simulated tests and any nuclear tests in future and then India shouls agree and sign such a treaty
The Nuclear eanergy can only contribute to 8% of energy needs at its maximum level.
The whole world is moving in the direction of Green energy like wind, solar and Hydro and we are with our natural ressources better placed to tap the same.
California state has allocated 22.6 Billion US$ for the development of Green energy during the coming 3 years for cloising down all their Nuclear energy faclities and we are fighting for the surplus nuclear fuel from california.
What a jokers we are ?
We live exactly in same state when our ancestors sold each kingsly states to East India company assuming that they would bring technoolgy and development.w
RE:AMERICA IS LOOKING FOR A BUYER FOR THEIR SURPLUS THORIUM
by RAJ on Jul 08, 2008 03:36 PM Permalink
The American Educated ( i am nothing against American education) Man Mohan-Chidambram-Kamalnath-Montek team is all bent to do all they can to please US. They are selling India piece by piece in the name of Nuclear energy and they are well aware that, as long as the corruopt English media support them, the middle class also salute them.
RE:AMERICA IS LOOKING FOR A BUYER FOR THEIR SURPLUS THORIUM
by S Shrikanth on Jul 08, 2008 03:35 PM Permalink
Exactly, the way they sold their obsolete weapons, they are trying to sell their waste and hazardous nuclear fuel and technology to India and they are thelselves moving to Green Fuel.
MMS and desperate to help US and MSY is taking full advantage of it.