Come on Guys! Wake up! It is Bush who needs to understand what is Clean / Green technology as USA is a rogue country which has not yet signed the Kyoto Protocol and contributing maximum to environmental destruction. Cleverly, they make believe that India & China have learnt about Clean/Green Technologies from USA as if they were culprits till then! Rediff should be smart enough not to fall for these kind of gimmicks and be judious enough to report facts and expose these tricks
Rediff head-line is wrong, Bush never said to help India in his speach. I followed his full lecture. There is something wrong in Rediff and its reporters.
RE:I LOVE YOU
by Dev on Jan 29, 2008 11:48 AM Permalink
i know it, even i personally dont like bush, but many people in india dreaming mass murderer modi to become president of india, then why not bush? i think he is perfect along side modi :)
RE:RE:I LOVE YOU
by abhi on Jan 29, 2008 12:07 PM Permalink
I love to see bush becoming president of india ....so that all import of teorist from all muslim country will stop..
RE:I LOVE YOU
by Afroz Patel on Jan 29, 2008 02:04 PM Permalink
Bush could not stop terrorists coming to his own country, how is he going to help India in that regard?
RE:I LOVE YOU
by SkShazid on Jan 29, 2008 12:39 PM Permalink
India need 3 president. First is Modi: Clean and cull all anti-nationalist organising terror across nation. Put full fencing and declare Bangladesh a terrorist nation. He will also pave way for starting growth of economics. Manmohan Singh: He sd lead the economic agenda and roll the nation growth path. Kalam: Bring him back for a diversified growth across the nation. Need to clean some black darts politicians: Deve Gowda, Mamta Banerjee, Sonia Gandhi, Karunanidhi, Jayalalitha
this country has conducted so many nuclear tests, their cars are among the most fuel consuming variants, and they advcoate the use of cleaner energy sources, Why?? so that they can continue using unclean energy sources.., But we are also responsible for this. The most dangerous way in which we are exploiting the nature is we are cutting lot of trees daily for news papers. What is there in the news papers except shit... Some idiots write shit and circulate .. and others like us read that shit. We have radio, TV, websites kind of non polluting mdeia, When there is lot of shit available on blogs of many websites then what is the need to cut trees for printing news papers and magazines which are costing nature dearly. If at all we have any concern for nature, then we should immediately stop buying newspapers magazines etc. Otherwise nature knows how to retaliate..nature is much much powerful than man... nature will show this power in the form of floods, climate warming etc.
RE:Pathetic Country's Pathetic Prez
by Snehendu Biswas on Jan 29, 2008 12:23 PM Permalink
Can u please name one radio/TV channel which can compensate for 30 minute of newspaper reading. In TVs they show News in between the Ads not the other way round. And almost 90% of people don't have proper access to the internet. Why don't you say to stop using TV and computer so that the electricity demand comes down which will in turn require less fossil fuels and hence there will be less pollution.
RE:Pathetic Country's Pathetic Prez
by Yusuf Ahmad on Jan 29, 2008 12:40 PM Permalink
U r in a big illusion that TVs and computer consume lot of electricity, just 100watts. How can you ask TVs to compensate for newspapers, u r comparing apples and oranges. U want to watch movies in newspapers, is it possible, u can watch on TV, Also more than 50% of newspaper is filled with ads, Majority of population is having access to tv or atleast doordarshan. U can see that natural resources are utilized for power generation which is a good use of natural resources, but u cant see that trees are being cut just for printing news papers which is sold next day @Rs2/- per kg.
I followed full lecture of Bush, but rediff picked up wrong Head-line. What is wrong with rediff ? Bush never told to help India. Rather he told to find out new Technology which can boost America. I brought India in his speach, but not at all whole-heartedly for helping India or giving India a benefit.
There must be something seriously wrong with Rediff and its reporters. May be Rediff tries to show that Bush is truly friend of India and that rediff is trying to pull public campain to get N-deal done by spineless MMSingh during the tennure of Bush. Wrong perception. If N-deal is delayed for good cause, then that is acceptable, rediff should realise that. Before signing everything should be clear in the parliament and to the people of India.
RE:I followed full lecture of Bush, but rediff head-line is wroing.
by Rahul Roy on Jan 29, 2008 11:34 AM Permalink
ya its true,even its a strange statement committed by rediff.
