PUNE: Citizens better watch out, particularly if you live any of the 18 localities which has been identified by the city crime branch as %u2018most prone%u2019 to house break-ins and thefts (HBTs).
An analysis of 1,300 HBTs reported in 2007 by the crime branch has revealed that it is not just the fringe areas, such as Chinchwad village, Nigdi, New Sangvi, Dhankawadi and Mithanagar, but upmarket areas like Shivajinagar, are also prone to house break-ins. These are the localities that figure prominently in the list prepared by the crime branch.
Other areas include Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority (PCNTDA), Bhosari, Hadapsar, Wanowrie, Old Sangvi, Kalewadi, Aundh, Yerawada, Bibvewadi, Tingrenagar and Kondhwa.
In fact, Chinchwad village, Nigdi, PCNTDA, Hadapsar and Wanowrie had reported over 20 HBTs each in 2007.
The remaining localities saw between 10 to 20 cases of thefts and house break-ins last year. There are 50 more areas, such as Sadashiv Peth, Nana Peth, F.C. road, Prabhat road, J.M. road, Sinhagad road, Maharshinagar and Handewadi, among others, which reported between 5 to 10 HBTs in 2007.
The common modus operandi employed by thieves was breaking locks or cutting window grills to enter the house.
Other methods deployed were breaking door latch, use of duplicate keys to open locks and driving holes in the walls of jewellery shops.
RE:PUNE - If you live in these areas, beware!
by rajesh chavan on Feb 17, 2008 09:08 AM Permalink
Your reply is not in tune with the article.Mr.Tarun Vijay is telling something and you are replying something which is not relevent to the topic.Perhaps you have not read the article.
RE:RE:PUNE - If you live in these areas, beware!
by your name on Feb 17, 2008 10:52 AM Permalink
he has done copy and paste from some other news clippings
RE:PUNE - If you live in these areas, beware!
by Bhaumik on Feb 18, 2008 05:20 AM Permalink
What this FireDesire has written is more useful and less hypocritical than the RSS man Mr. Vijay wrote.
RE:RE:PUNE - If you live in these areas, beware!
by Bhaumik on Feb 18, 2008 05:21 AM Permalink
What this FireDesire has written is more useful and less hypocritical than waht the RSS man Mr. Vijay wrote.
Raj Mumbai is going on Tamil Nadu way... Maharastra should learn from Tamil Nadu past.
Now Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh become top IT exporting states of South India.
M Karunanidhi CM of Tamil Nadu, India Started his career with Anti-Hindi agitations and built on many years anti-North Indian agitations picketing shops run by North Indian merchants and tarring over Hindi names on public billboards.
Now because of Karunanidhi policies Tamil Nadu which was one the leading state in south India few decades back is now far behind with other south Indian states. Now Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh become top IT exporting states of South India.
Raj Thakre is a narrow minded person. This is a time of Globalization whole Maharastra will suffer because of Raj. Raj has no objection in sending Marastrians to overseas countries but have objection if other states people work in Maharastra. More then 30 millions INDIANS NRI's out of which 5 millions are Maharashtras Indians(NRI's) working in overseas countries.
RE:RE:Raj Mumbai is going on Tamil Nadu way...
by joshi george on Feb 17, 2008 02:53 PM Permalink
Well so what is so wrong you find with tamilnadu now? Just don't cook up a point.
But yes their attitude sucks. Its pathetic. They are ego mainiac. Not sesitive to the needs and rights of other people. But u cant blame them, blame the system which produce them. the education systems, the leaders. they are to be blamed. And now whole india should take responsibility for them then only something can happen. Good news is now Nithish kumar is working to teach them some discipline and progressive attitude. But at centre Lallo and sonia wont let him get fund for progress since nitish will get all the credit for development of bihar. So most of the project in bihar is stuck beacuse of this politics. U feel really pity for bihar's luck. This state has been milked so much by lallo in last 15 years that only skelton is remaining. Now same thing Mayavati is doing with UP. She has no time for growth of UP at all, she is so busy with becoming a national politician.
If Tarun Vijay can divide hindus among caste lines, why will politicians not do it along language and any other lines. RSS has divided Indians along religious lines and hindus along caste lines.
RE:RE:RSS dividing hindus along caste lines
by alok kushwah on Feb 17, 2008 10:51 AM Permalink
If you don't know a bit about RSS then why are you commenting on it?
RE:RSS dividing hindus along caste lines
by AK on Feb 17, 2008 10:26 AM Permalink
who told you that RSS divided hindus, this is the only union try to arrange hindus together without having knowledge whats happening in INdia dont bluff, atleast read newspaper. What you know about communist, congress,.
RE:RSS dividing hindus along caste lines
by ramesh chengappa on Feb 17, 2008 11:43 AM Permalink
1) President Dr. Zakir Hussain during a Milad mehfil at Munger held on 20.11.1949 said: "It is totally false to allege that Sangh hates or attacks the Muslims. In fact, Muslims also must learn mutual love and respect, co-operation and skillful organisation from the Sangh".
2) Chief Justice Of India Shri Koka Subbarao on 25.08.1968 at Bangalore, said, "Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh is creating national consciousness and cohesion-through self-reformation and mental and physical discipline. It has now become a household name throughout the country and everybody recognises the selfless service it is rendering to the people. The Sangh has also been striving to rejuvenate the Hindu tradition-which has always allowed all faiths to be practised without any discrimination. This is in fact the essence of secularism. Therefore accusing the Sangh as anti-secular is meaningless".
3) Field Marshal K.M.Carriappa at Mangalore, in 1959, declared: "RSS work is my heart's work.... My dear youngmen, don't be disturbed by the uncharitable comments of interested persons. Dr. Hedgewar, the revered founder of this great organisation, has set before you a bright example of selfless devotion to the service of our motherland."
SO ALL LOW LIFE VERMINS....CONTINUE TO ROT IN THE SEWAGE OF PSEUDOSEUCLARISM... RSS CARES A RATS BEHIND TO WHAT YOU FOOLS THINK....IT WILL CONTINUE ITS NOBLE MISSION... THE DOGS BARK..BUT THE CARAVAN PASSES
RE:RSS dividing hindus along caste lines
by Bhaumik on Feb 18, 2008 05:25 AM Permalink
Why reproduce all thois selctive quotes, when the fact on then ground is RSS is a sectarian outfit out to divide Indians on religious and caste (of course!) lines?
RE:RE:RSS dividing hindus along caste lines
by Bhaumik on Feb 18, 2008 05:26 AM Permalink
Why reproduce all those selctive quotes, when the fact on the ground is that RSS is a sectarian outfit out to divide Indians on religious and caste (of course!) lines?
No amount of polishing or white-washing can erase reality.
RE:RSS dividing hindus along caste lines
by stav on Feb 17, 2008 12:13 PM Permalink
To all those morons who haven't read this article. can you tell me what do these sentences indicate:
"In India, to be an Indian alone is a deficiency factor. You have to be a Jat, Gujjar, SC or ST or Yadav, or Muslim to live with political support and get state protection and aid."
RE:History
by chetan patil on Feb 17, 2008 12:36 PM Permalink
Aabe Ghade Tune ye kis history book mein paddha "Mumbai" is a marathi ward."Mumba" and "Aai",'Mumba' is a goddess mainly worshiped by fishermans on costs of mumbai and the word 'Aai' means 'Maa'. It is this arrogant and insensitive natur of you people because of which we hate you. You show no respect for other peoples sentiments adn then you want them to respect you.
RE:Sermon on brotherhood
by bala sreenivasan on Feb 17, 2008 12:10 PM Permalink
Uniting Hindus is communal, but issuing fatwa or raising pro-Pak. jihadi slogans is secular! Banning 'Davinci Code'in reverence to minority sentiment is secular, but condemning MF Hussain or Deepa Mehta is communal; Baying for the blood of Danish cartoonist is secular, protests against Benny Hinn's anti-Hindu lectures is 'communal' Govt. taking up temple administration or paying Hajj subsidy for Muslims from taxpayer's money is secular, but demand for common civil code is 'communal' Curbing Togadia's movements and freedom of speech is secular, but protest against the visti of the pope who speaks of a 'rich harvest of faith' through conversions is communal. Demanding death sentence for Dara Singh is victory of secularism, but demanding death sentence for AFzal Guru is 'communal' Who is more qualified than the RSS to raise these issues concerning the nation?
RE:Sermon on brotherhood
by Bhaumik on Feb 18, 2008 05:31 AM Permalink
Bala, "Uniting Hindus is communal, but issuing fatwa or raising pro-Pak. jihadi slogans is secular!"
When any religious group is 'unified' on the basis of hatred of people of other religion and indulge in violence.. that is of course communal. That is why true patriotic Indians stamp muslim fundementalists, RSS, or any other such group as communal.
Unless you yourselves is communalistic you must be proud of such majority Indians opposed to such fundementalists.
RE:Sermon on brotherhood
by bala sreenivasan on Feb 18, 2008 10:45 AM Permalink
Bhaumik, RSS agenda is inclusive. Through Hindutva, RSS tells all minorities, "you belong here to this great land; by religion, you may be a Muslim, christian or parsi, but by culture you are a Hindu" It is not not an exclusive agenda promoted by semitic relgions that didvide the world as believers and non-believers. The cultural life of India is dead without the intrinsic Hinduness in it. Recognize it, Respect it. Rest of the things will fall in place. Take the case of Indonesia, a predominantly Muslim country. they are proud of their Hindu heritage- until recently at least! That does not make them any less muslims than their brethren elsewhere. What's your answer to the vote bank politics practised by Gandhi-Nehru Party for decades? Why only temples should be managed by the Govt. If you accept the fundamental unity of all religions and have respect for them, why do you encourage conversions? Think, Bhaumikji! If this is what secularism is all about, I do not want it; I am happy to be a communalist
RE:Sermon on brotherhood
by dev singh on Feb 17, 2008 07:54 AM Permalink
well mullas never like RSS and there is no doubt about this. This article was intended for nationalist audience. so go and read some urdu paper mulla.
RE:Sermon on brotherhood
by Master Blaster on Feb 17, 2008 08:09 AM Permalink
How is it that no right thinking indian likes the RSS? Why is it nobody in india has a good word for thir hate organization?
RE:Sermon on brotherhood
by Herman Hermit on Feb 17, 2008 08:12 AM Permalink
Then India's muslim population must be 98%! 'cause except the hindutva bramins nobody likes this hate spreading org.
Companies including IT,manifacturing and all should comeoput and start in other states , through that only these guys will learn lesson and also the puppet govt.Presnt govt is waste, not doing anything against criminals, just watch and enjoying..
UP/Bihar is a hopeless state, there leaders never developed and will never try to develop these states. All this North Indians are just burden on the India, drag on Indian GDP. Why Maharashtra should suffer for hopelessness of these states leaders as well as people. Why can't these people go back to their state and develop so that they don't have to come to our state. Even if they come to our state they should respect local culture and people but UP/Biharis are very arrogant it is in their blood. UP/Biharis are cancer once on get infected there is no cure it will spread and one day there won't be Maharashtra.
So many PM came from UP but state is still at the bottom of every development, why can%u2019t they just do something about it , Laloo/Yadav should focus on developing UP/Bihar and not doing Chat Pujja and inciting North Indian in Mumbai. Maharashtra has so done much for the UP/Biharis that they should try to assimilate with the local population and say their leaders to go back to their filthy state but this hopeless people want more than that and want to take over Marathi with Hindi culture.
Though Indian constitution allows for every Indian to settle everywhere in the country it doesn't mean one should occupy others property and try to dominate it by showing political power. What is so wrong when someone try to protect their own culture? Even Delhi is also not liking this UP/Biharis because when they come they come in herds and destroy all infrastructure.
RE:UP/Bihari's are burden on India and GDP
by Bhupinder Singh on Feb 17, 2008 07:11 AM Permalink
here comes the new social thinker about bombay supporter , mr sanjay can you tell me why thousands of farmer committing suicide in prosperous and rich maratha land, why some part of maharashtra is worse like adivasi, scheduled caste and poor farmers,,the money of tatas, birla, relience is the property of bombay people, they are getting ;mineral , coal, and raw meterial from up , bihar, rich mineral state,, up and bihar are poor becuase of congressi culture of rule and divide,,when india got independence bihar and up were the most advance state comparatively to other state, but casteism, religion, and central apathy have totaly brought down the system of state to low that they could not get system of efficiency and working,,the state like himachal,goa,have developed fast,,because they were small and politician were more accountable to people,, we need new set of governce rule of efficienty, accountiblity and proper education to poeple instead of tv ads and media misguiding new coverage,, we can solve the up , bihar problems without violence, like allowing all emigraants to get compulsory education in local colture and skill,, imposition of proper taxing system and law and order situation,,more parties are there , more the communal and dividing issues,,, think practicaly,, caste, religion ,never been the prosperity factor anywhere in world,,,no one help anyone,,,it is individual capacity to work hard and system which make any place rich and vibrant and prosperous,,
RE:UP/Bihari's are burden on India and GDP
by Anand Selot on Feb 17, 2008 07:33 AM Permalink
what did bjp do for the advancement of UP or Bihar when they were in power? Nothing and nothing but still you keep blaming congress for all your failures.
RE:UP/Bihari's are burden on India and GDP
by dev singh on Feb 17, 2008 07:58 AM Permalink
well, north india particularily up, mp, rajashatn, bihar were exploited by congress leaders for decades. Thugs like Raj and his uncle take advantage of the situation to further their political base in a mostly narrow minded marathi society. If you guys hate to be called indian then please go and merge with pakistan.
One person believed that we are Indians before being possessed by any religion, race, caste or creed. Being a victim of discrimination in South Africa he opposed it and then got back to his motherland to kick the Britishers out of his country by a simple policy of non-violence. That freedom struggle would be appreciated by every human being born on earth for centuries to come (probably "appreciated" is a undermining word). His name would replace non-violence in the dictionary. And today in the country which renamed its most beloved leader as the "Father of the Nation" , people like Raj Thackeray are defining Indians by virtue of their ethnicity. Hahaha.... Its a shame as to how low people like this can stoop down just to gain some political publicity and clout. "All Indians are my Brothers and sisters..." is one phrase every Indian student pledges time and again irrespective of being a Marathi, Tamilian, Gujrathi or ..... But am not sure what school Raj Thackeray went to......
RE:Raj Thackeray-The incarnation of Nathuram Godse
by Rambothu S on Feb 17, 2008 06:26 AM Permalink
Hush! Don't write like this in this message board, you may be banned for life. Afterall you are commenting on an article written by saheed Nathuram's own people. Please be respectful to HIM.
RE:Raj Thackeray-The incarnation of Nathuram Godse
by bala sreenivasan on Feb 17, 2008 12:18 PM Permalink
Equating Raj with Shaheed Nathuram Godse shows only your ignorance. Nathuramji was not an RSS man, but a Hindu Maha Sabha member, a fact often deliberately obfuscated by people like you to denigrate RSS. Nathuramji was very critical of RSS and did not approve of its 'soft' approach. Well, what he did could not be justified, but he was no less a patriot than the man he assassinated or the whole lot of Congress leaders who ruled the nation after him
