These yadav a*holes are still at it. Just to suppress the original truth they created a fake one making up all the stories while the speaker is still not releasing the CD & Rajdeep Sardesai's CNNIBN does not want to air it either.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 02:35 AM Permalink
Jack You can get a copy of that CD (BJP sting CD) from Speaker under right to information act. Then telecast it on any other Channel.
RE:RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by jack back on Aug 05, 2008 02:40 AM Permalink
Then again you can say it is fake since speker office never received or mailed such a CD.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 02:30 AM Permalink
Jack I think you are mad because Lalu & Mulayam Yadav beat BJP's jaitley in his own game.
I am surprised why they (BJP) did not themself kept a copy of CD. I think they want IBN stamp for its autenticity.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by jack back on Aug 05, 2008 02:38 AM Permalink
The logic is simple. I am sure BJP people are not that stupid when they have been fighting all these idiots for this long.
If a lay man can figure out what CNNIBN is like then why not BJP? They made one of their own as witness. But this animal Sardesai played even worse & did not air it. BJP never denied they don't have a copy. They simply want to have it come from the official source & so they can avoid all these bikering by the yadav rogues.
The world knows now that Sardesai had a tape, & he gave it to another crook called Chaterjee.Now that idiot is also a witness & so is government. These Yadav crooks had to play another dirty low game which they have started now.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 02:46 AM Permalink
Jack Bhagwat Geeta Says if you know you are fighting a Dharam Yudh, No attack is below belt attack. When you are fighting Crooks, you have to beat them in their tactics. Remember how in Mahabharat Bhim hit Duryodhan on his thigs (Janga). Lalu & Mulayam Yadav is doing the same thing. Its a path Sri Krishna showed us.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by jack back on Aug 05, 2008 02:57 AM Permalink
I hope you can provide me with clear refernce exactly where in Bhagwad Gita it is said so. I have read the book several time over not to find such a reference. There are 18 chapters, please tell me at least in which chapter it says so.
In Mahabharat Sri Krishna told Bhim & Bhim alone to do what you mentioned. We see no Bhim or Shri Krishna here. As a matter of fact these Yadavs don't even come close to Duryodhan or Sakuni. May be they are equivalent to those vultures fed upon Duryoudhan & Sakuni's spit etc.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 03:00 AM Permalink
I have also read Bhagwat Gita. its not in Gita. But in Mahabharat, you can find how Bhim hit Duryodhan below belt.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by jack back on Aug 05, 2008 03:03 AM Permalink
Then we can say that Shri Krishna's suggestion to Bhim was not a standard policy but an exceptional case for that time. And then again only Sri Krisha can make that decision.
RE:Master Yadav Plan!!!!!
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 03:31 AM Permalink
Jack, BJP guys are worse than Duryodan Shakuni. Crooks like Jaitley Can only be beaten by their own tactics. Even Bhagwat gita says you have to be on right side of Dharam Yudh. Actions are justified as long as they help to achieve right result.
RE:Amit
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 02:23 AM Permalink
Tewari ji, I don't need a ticket. I am only showing Mirror to BJP's Bhakth. Also try to bring real issue to counter Congress than old outdated Chamcha allegation. I think it would be better for BJP to give better reason to people of India on why they should elect them. Rather than sonia's family connection and citizenship.
RE:Amit
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 02:51 AM Permalink
Jack I wonder if I can hate any body like you. Why are you filled with so much hatred for Sonia.
RE:Amit
by jack back on Aug 05, 2008 03:07 AM Permalink
I guess you are reading me wrong. As a person there is nothing about her.She is an unlucky to loose husband yet lucky enough to get all wealth & power she has.
But there are so many idiot crooks hiding behind a poor widow & she is providing a cover using gullible Hindu minds. So like her aunt had said around last election, either get out & stay respected or get hit till crooks are not protected by her.
RE:Amit
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 03:38 AM Permalink
I don't know what of Hindu are you. Hindu who can't give respect to a widow. You can't be Hindu. You are bringing disrespect to Hinduism by using abusive language against her and fellow Hindu.
You look like a frustrated BJP leader who played every dirty tactics to get power but was failed.
Since you have read Gita countless time, you must have read about Dhayan yoga chapter. Where Lord Krishna teaches you how to control your mind. This defiantly help you.
RE:Amit
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 05:19 AM Permalink
Jack back I take pity on you. You are hiding your identity under a Christian name and talking about hinduism. Reveal your identity. You can't use your name for discussion.
sonia gandi sued the hindus in usa who accused her of corruption the day when her royal-fakeness came down to u.n. presuming to wear mahatma gandhi's mantle. she can dupe the clueless hindus in amethi and buy their votes for a penny and votes of some mps for a few crores but she isn't going to dupe the hindus in usa. this cash-for-votes clearly shines the light of truth on sonia. what we see is her ugliness in full.
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 11:13 PM Permalink
I heard rightwing RSS group don't like Gandhism. These are the guys who killed Gandhi. Now I am surprised why were they protesting when Sonia came to NewYork to wear Mahatma's Mantle. Since When RSS guys become saviour of Gandhism.
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by sam on Aug 05, 2008 02:00 AM Permalink
Had Sonia followed Gandhism, she wont have allowed Congress to say that Ram never existed in this world. Politics is funny, isnt it! If she dont beleive in Gandhis philosophy then why she is accepting honor for Gandhi. Do you know she never wanted to accept Indian citizenship but was forced to accept it as Rajiv entered politics. Now she see has become most shrewed politician.
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by Nadhan on Aug 05, 2008 01:24 AM Permalink
Kno wyour histrory first? And can you prove that RSS was behind the Gandhi's assassination? RSS worked for the betterment of every individual during indo china and indo pak wars.and mind you just that Sonia happens to have a name of Gandhi doesn't maker her one. in fact the Name Gandhi has been hijacked by the Nehru family, Go get a life.
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by asdf asdf on Aug 05, 2008 01:27 AM Permalink
even indira gandhi hijacked it from gandhi, can some one say how indira nehru became indira gandhi after marrying ferrose khan
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 01:38 AM Permalink
you need to check your fact. Do some research and you will find RSS. Though RSS tried to change many names. First Hindu Maha Sabha, then RSS, then Jan Sangh, then BJP.
Though they (RSS) are coward never accepted that charge.
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by jack back on Aug 05, 2008 01:56 AM Permalink
Godse killed Gandhi,then why RSS is being blamed?
I tell you why.
Sure Godse was member of RSS at one time. But when he decided to do what he did, he knew he would not have a taker in RSS. So first he resigned from that oragnization & did not involve any one from that to carry out the job. He did everything on his own with a few of close bodies.
Then how RSS came into picture?
It was all Neru's making. The idiot was afraid of RSS as a thief will be afraid of security.So he saw an opportunity to destroy 2 birds with a single stone, Gandhi on one hand & RSS on the other. Idiot already knew that Godse & gang were planning the job, yet did not act upon it. Once Godse killed Gandi, he used the incident for political purpose & still ripping the fruits out of it. Does any one know how much terror he inflicted upon RSS after the incident? It was similar to what happened to Sikhs after Indira Gandi, may be worst.
RE:the cash-for- votes shines light on sonia's lawsuit in usa
by Amit Yadav on Aug 05, 2008 02:14 AM Permalink
Jack why don't you try your luck as script writer for Hindi movie.
You gave a completly different twist to Mahatma's Assisnation (pardon my spell mistake).
Once I used to attend RSS shakas. I used attend their various event when Rajju Bhaiyya was its leader. I attended their few rallies too. One rally I attended at Red fort, which was atted by Vajpaee, Advani, Murli Manhor , Rajju Bhaiyya too in Khaki nicker. I am very well aware of how this orgnisation work. Even today I know their prayer (Namaste Sada Vastlae Matre Bhume.....) and their way of saluting their Flag. In Ardh vitar (semi circle meeting), I still remember how they boost themself of election voilence they used to conduct. Most people here on this who sing RSS peon never attended RSS shakhas. They don't know real face of this organisation.
BJP come to senses don't dare to challange high and mighty of UP and Bihar!! This will lead to direct confrontation of UP&Bihar vrs others. When Raj Thackeray was jumping and pumping UP and Bihar saw your silence. Those who suck Thackeray's have no right to teach anything to people of UP and Bihar. This Tackeray's sucking will cost BJP very dear. It is indeed UP/Bihar vrs others. If it is not then it will become one very soon!!!! I am very happy that Brahma-Vishnu-Mahesh of Hindi Hriday have united to finish off the evil of BJP and Congress from Bharat. Devishakti of UP and God of governance of Bihar will end up joining hands with them. No need to mention what is happening with Hindi speaking population in rest of India. Mulayam, Lalu, Mayawati and Nitish think and think hard, if we Hindus can not perform Chhath Puja in Bharat then where else? Fight together to protect interests of Hindi speaking people. Don't worry if the consequences are Mathistaan or Khalistaan because they are already there. Hindi Janta ka udhhar karo.
Congress is not same Congress what it was two decade ago. It no more dictate term what it used to do earlier. Rajiv never acquired skills of Indra. After Rajiv congress further weakened. Now they can't form govt on their own, they need likes of Lalu, Mulayam, Sharad, Shibu. You argument about Congress being dynastic do not hold good. What ever congress is today is because of people of India. Majority of People of India has faith in Congress that why they voted for Congress. Plus BJP was never able to form a stable coliation to give a alternative to BJP.
Plus BJP made Vasundra Raje CM of Rajastan. You can find many leader in BJP who worked harder than Vasundra, but BJP made her CM. I think her only qualification is she is daughter of her mother Vijay Raje Sindhia.
Now her son Dushant is also MP from BJP. I doubt with this example you can claim BJP to be Cradle based party like Left. Few days back I heard Rajnath was also interested of bringing his son in politics.
Dynasty is in our blood. If you look from Business to Entertainment you will find numerous example. Whether its Anil Ambani, Mukesh Ambani, Abhisheik Baccahan, Sunny Deol, Mittals, Bajajs, Birla, Kapoors, ..... list is long. Congress Dynasty is refelection of our society.
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 09:45 PM Permalink
Amit. U r very wrong in saying that "Majority of People of India has faith in Congress that why they voted for Congress. Plus BJP was never able to form a stable coliation to give a alternative to BJP." Firstly Congress did not get majority. It got one of the worst seats at 145/545. It the allied with its enemies for ruling. Later on also it is losing in one state after another. Secondly BJP had run a coalition govt for full term.
As regards yr comment about dynastic politics in BJP, pl note that they elect different people as its president, who r not at all related to each other. Some politicians r relatives of senior people, bcz politicians relatives r not forbidden. See what happened in US. Wife of Clinton lost to Obama. A Sonia Parivar person will not hv anyone to stand against him or her, unless he wants to b forced out.
Dynasty in business is a different matter. That is part of the caitalist system, where parent's money is the children's money. But the same principle cannot b applied in politics.
Congress govts, since 1947 r being ruled by only one family, except for Shashtry (who mysteriously died in Tashkent) for 1.5 yrs and PVN Rao. Though now MMS is PM, but that is only in name. He does not hv any power, that is the reason China invited Sonia Parivar, the real ruler by proxy, for the Olympics. Congress propagates nepotism. Now all parties except Left & BJP r ruled by the whims of a person.
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 10:12 PM Permalink
Sharma ji, See you your self bring biggest fault in your argument by saying " Some politicians r relatives of senior people, bcz politicians relatives r not forbidden."
You are contradicting yourself. When Sonia or Rahul become president of congress, you hate dynasty. When Vasundra become CM, you see no problem with dynasty.
Morally their is not much difference between BJP and Congress.
Your love for BJP has obstructed your rationality.
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Ram Sharma on Aug 08, 2008 01:16 PM Permalink
U r trying to confuse and nothing else. Relatives of politicians can get elected. But giving highest importance to only one family only in a party is wrong. That is what is happening in Congress. Noone can challenge any member of Sonia Parivar in the party. It is not so in BJP or Left. Due to the example shown by Congress this has become the norm in many non BJP, non Left parties.
However, if u don't want to see with yr open eyes, I cannot help it.
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Sanjay Pandey on Aug 04, 2008 10:53 PM Permalink
yadav bhaiya come to discuss here with a brain.Ram has clearly explained that in bjp son is not yuvraj,but in congress he is yuvraj and nobody in party can challenge him I know you will again give a foolish reply
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 11:05 PM Permalink
Pandey Ji, Here is my foolish reply.
Here are simple fact
- India is democracy. - What ever Congress or BJP proposes it goes to Public. - Now public deciedes on whether they like congress or BJP's Propsal or not. - If congress proposes Rahul as Yuvraj, then public can discard him. - But majority of public decieded to keep Rahul as Yuvraj - Its not congress who decides who is going to be youvaj. - Its public who makes Yuvraj not party. - Public showed confidence in Indra , Rajiv and now Rahul and Sonia.
Hope these bullet point explanation will help you... And yes don't forgot to take out you BJP colored Glasses before reading this.
Good luck Pandey Ji.
Their is a life out their other than BJP. If you are BJP Bhakth
RE:For Ram Sharma
by reformer on Aug 04, 2008 11:22 PM Permalink
and funniest thing that people are fighting on the messageboards. For most of them, at the end of day, there won't be any difference. and tomorrow will be the same
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 10:02 PM Permalink
Sharma ji now you are confused. Yes people of India showed confidence in Congress. You can check your facts. Congress is in more states than BJP. Also you can check congress received maximum percentage of Votes than any other party. You skipped my argument on Business and Enterainment. Atleast in entertainment just like politics people decided which movie they are going to go. You will notice 90 % of stars have relation in Film Industry. You have to accept that we have this dynasty in our blood.
RE:RE:For Ram Sharma
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 10:16 PM Permalink
You definetly need a good night sleep. Sleep well buddy. Sweet dream...... Advani become PM....Szzzzzzzz
RE:For Ram Sharma
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 10:09 PM Permalink
U r trying to confuse. There is no confusion, when I say that Congress did not get majority and that BJP also completed one full term of coalition govt. Even a child knows this fact.
I also did not skip yr point about businessmen & film industry. See third para on my comment on business.
There should not b dynasty rule in politics, as shown by Left & BJP. In BJP (Just like Democrates & Republicans in USA) there r some relatives, but they r treated just like any other ordinary party member and r not considered as 'Yuvraj'.
Do u remember, the telgi's narco statements,which were aired on channels. That time,Mr Pawar and his supporters defended that narco is scientifically proven.
Everybody here is no saint. Its only fool people like us rely on them, think that country is in safehands
RE:sharad pawar demanded narco...
by reformer on Aug 04, 2008 09:07 PM Permalink
and funniest thing that people are fighting on the messageboards. For most of them, at the end of day, there won't be any difference. and tomorrow will be the same.
Our Parliament is infested with petty politicians, criminals and trickisters. They are in all parties, be it UPA, NDA, BSP, JMM, Paswan's Party, or Charan Singh's Jat Party. They are all chips of the same block. Democracy in India has gone to the dogs. It is a futile exercise for the Speaker to find out the truth in this matter.
RE:Bribe & MPs
by naveed ali on Aug 05, 2008 02:06 AM Permalink
and the funny part is they come to us every 5 years and we elect them again.. so...who is here to blame??
RE:Hv Narco test on Lalu for Chara Ghotala & black money
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 08:06 PM Permalink
Lalu don't smoke crack. Its BJP leader who regularly smoke weed. Lalu was just refereing to their tradition. Remember Jaswant was caught serving crack in his party. How can you forgot Mahajans ?? His sectary died due to overdose. Yeh BJP suit case guy was shot his own brother while on dope.
RE:Hv Narco test on Lalu for Chara Ghotala & black money
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:10 PM Permalink
"Paisa khuda toh nahi lekin khuda ki kassam khuda se kam bhi nahi" patent dialogue of judev , wasn't that entertaining Mr. fake Ram
RE:Hv Narco test on Lalu for Chara Ghotala & black money
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 08:43 PM Permalink
For people like u, all corruption episodes and comments r for fun only. Can't help it.
Does Judev's comment prove that Lalu, Mulayam, Amar, Karunanidhi, Sonia, Soren etc r all clean and honest?
RE:Hv Narco test on Lalu for Chara Ghotala & black money
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 09:02 PM Permalink
It is your problem that you take lalu mulayam soren ,sonia , amar etc seriously.
RE:Hv Narco test on Lalu for Chara Ghotala & black money
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 09:48 PM Permalink
I never take these corrupt people seriously. They mostly tell lies.
RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 07:54 PM Permalink
Cry baby cry your crocodile tears will definitely create tsunami one day
RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 07:56 PM Permalink
Since u don't hv any logic, u can just make statement. Nothing great in it.
RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:06 PM Permalink
If logic can be created by just repeating same matter then you are master of it. Infact you are already swimming in your own tears , continue we always need some fun in life.
RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 08:21 PM Permalink
People like u can only hv fun in corruption. No reply to the points raised above in the name of repeatation. Best logic.
RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 08:38 PM Permalink
U will find fun in all replies. Bcz u don't hv reply to any of the points raised by me. I don't consider Judev someone great. U r a big sycophant of Fake Gandhis, even title Gandhi is also fake, just to fool the common people for a long time.
RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:27 PM Permalink
One more funny reply. Just read it carefully may some logic can be created out of it. " Paisa khuda toh nahi lekin khuda ki kassam khuda se kam bhi nahi" by judev. Any logicccccccc!!!!!!!!!
RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 09:52 PM Permalink
It is difficult to teach logic to a confused person like u. None of the persons mentioned by u r great. Don't try to confuse the issue. The issue is about the honesty of people ruling us.
And what do u mean by fake Ram? Did I say that I am God Ram? Then why r u finding fault with my name? Give logic, not foolish statements.
RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:48 PM Permalink
You don't consider Judev , bangaru, Mamata , jayalalita great then what is logic behind considering lalu ,soren. mulayam ,amar singh great. Please educate us with your logical answer Mr. fake ram.
RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 08:01 PM Permalink
Sharma Ji, BJP is most clean party. BJP has broken all record of corruption when it started indulging in cash for Question scam. Never ever a party is accused of corruption while in opposition, it is the honor bestowed only on BJP.
BJP MPs are ilegally smuggling people to western country for money while in opposition. BJP MPs has degraded value of Diplomatic Passport while in opposition. Prominent Leader of BJP was shot for land and money dispute with his brother. His sectary died due to drug overdose with his son. Not to mention Coffin scam and Jain Hawala case against PM in waiting. So far UPA is not indulged in any Scam till now. Though I am not claiming UPA is un Tainted. Only I am saying its less tainted compared to BJP.
RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 08:34 PM Permalink
Who told u that BJP does not hv corrupt or greedy people? Except Left, Amar Singh and company approached all MPs for abstaining or supporting the trust vote. Many greedy people went for selling themselves.
The person, u r accusing of smuggling people to western countries, abstained, when he was told that case against will b made weak if he abstains. That is the level of honesty of UPA.
UPA went down on its knees towards the murderer & jailed MPs for votes. They even renamed an airport in Charan Singh's name, who was ditched by Indira before a trust vote. Though his son still did not vote for the govt. MMS directly dealing with the most opportunistic another ex PM, Devegouda, but could not meet his demand.
It was the darkest day in the free India for the way MPs were traded, surpassing the record of bribing by earlier Congress PM PVN Rao.
As regards Hawala, politicians from most of the parties were involved, so just don't single out Advani. Sharad Yadav even admitted to taking hawala. But he was also not touched, as noone else was convicted in a big scandal, in which Rajiv's name was also there in the diary of Jain.
Congress is the most tainted party, as it set the example of dynastic rule, which is now followed in many parties. Except BJP & Left all other parties r run on the whims of an individual.
RE:RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:51 PM Permalink
The same Mulayam was approached by opium singh with folded hands and bended knees to accept BJP's offer to become PM. They were not untouchables at that time am I right Mr. fake ram?
RE:RE:RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 09:55 PM Permalink
U r right. BJP is also in politics.
And what do u mean by fake Ram? Did I say that I am God Ram? Then why r u finding fault with my name? Give logic, not foolish statements. Am I saying Fake Jitendra? No, bcz I am not bothered, whether u hv control over yr 'Indriya'. It is the name given by yr parents. Why trying to confuse issues, when u hv no logic? The issue here is type of people ruling us.
RE:RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 09:06 PM Permalink
Congress is not same Congress what it was two decade ago. It no more dictate term what it used to do earlier. Rajiv never acquired skills of Indra. After Rajiv congress further weakened. Now they can't form govt on their own, they need likes of Lalu, Mulayam, Sharad, Shibu. You argument about Congress being dynastic do not hold good. What ever congress is today is because of people of India. Majority of People of India has faith in Congress that why they voted for Congress. Plus BJP was never able to form a stable coliation to give a alternative to BJP.
Plus BJP made Vasundra Raje CM of Rajastan. You can find many leader in BJP who worked harder than Vasundra, but BJP made her CM. I think her only qualification is she is daughter of her mother Vijay Raje Sindhia.
Now her son Dushant is also MP from BJP. I doubt with this example you can claim BJP to be Cradle based party like Left. Few days back I heard Rajnath was also interested of bringing his son in politics.
Dynasty is in our blood. If you look from Business to Entertainment you will find numerous example. Whether its Anil Ambani, Mukesh Ambani, Abhisheik Baccahan, Sunny Deol, Mittals, Bajajs, Birla, Kapoors, ..... list is long. Congress Dynasty is refelection of our society.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 09:57 PM Permalink
Amit. U r very wrong in saying that "Majority of People of India has faith in Congress that why they voted for Congress. Plus BJP was never able to form a stable coliation to give a alternative to BJP." Firstly Congress did not get majority. It got one of the worst seats at 145/545. It the allied with its enemies for ruling. Later on also it is losing in one state after another. Secondly BJP had run a coalition govt for full term.
As regards yr comment about dynastic politics in BJP, pl note that they elect different people as its president, who r not at all related to each other. Some politicians r relatives of senior people, bcz politicians relatives r not forbidden. See what happened in US. Wife of Clinton lost to Obama. A Sonia Parivar person will not hv anyone to stand against him or her, unless he wants to b forced out.
Dynasty in business is a different matter. That is part of the caitalist system, where parent's money is the children's money. But the same principle cannot b applied in politics.
Congress govts, since 1947 r being ruled by only one family, except for Shashtry (who mysteriously died in Tashkent) for 1.5 yrs and PVN Rao. Though now MMS is PM, but that is only in name. He does not hv any power, that is the reason China invited Sonia Parivar, the real ruler by proxy, for the Olympics. Congress propagates nepotism. Now all parties except Left & BJP r ruled by the whims of a person
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Amit Yadav on Aug 04, 2008 10:20 PM Permalink
Sharma ji now you are confused. Yes people of India showed confidence in Congress. You can check your facts. Congress is in more states than BJP. Also you can check congress received maximum percentage of Votes than any other party. You skipped my argument on Business and Enterainment. Atleast in entertainment just like politics people decided which movie they are going to go. You will notice 90 % of stars have relation in Film Industry. You have to accept that we have this dynasty in our blood.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sonia, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Amar Singh, Sibu Soren etc r some of the most corrupt
by Ram Sharma on Aug 08, 2008 01:19 PM Permalink
There is no confusion. Only u r trying to confuse, bcz u don't know anything. That is the reason u r saying that Congress is in more states than Bjp.
I did not skip anything. I hv replied that business and politics r different.
RE:Three at one place
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 07:59 PM Permalink
MMS has never won any election. He is a puppet PM, just to obey orders of Sonia.
RE:RE:Three at one place
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 09:07 PM Permalink
Your municipal corporator has all th ability to become PM because he wins all the municipal elections. lalu , paswan,mulayam, karunanidhi, Phoolan devi, bhangan mayabtti,pappu yadav, soharabuddin, uma bharti, bangaru laxman , judev etc etc are real PM candidates , any logical answer for this list Mr. fake ram
RE:RE:RE:Three at one place
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 10:02 PM Permalink
PM should b chosen from people elected in Loksabha. People like MMS & Shiv Raj Patil r from Rajya Sabha (Patil lost election in 2004 & was brought through Rajya Sabha like MMS). Of course that does not mean that everyone is fit to b a PM.
And what do u mean by fake Ram? Did I say that I am God Ram? Then why r u finding fault with my name? Give logic, not foolish statements. Am I saying Fake Jitendra? No, bcz I am not bothered, whether u hv control over yr 'Indriya'. It is the name given by yr parents. Why trying to confuse issues, when u hv no logic? The issue here is type of people ruling us.
RE:Three at one place
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:00 PM Permalink
You are right they should be thrown into the jail and Mamata ,Samta ,Jaylalita , bangaru laxman, judev ( Patent dialogue of Judev :- Paisa khuda toh nahi , lekin khuda ki kasam khuda se kamm bhi nahi ) should brought back to power once again. We are missing those entertaining episodes.
RE:Three at one place
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 08:40 PM Permalink
MMS has surpassed even PVN Rao in bribing episode. BJP did not indulge in it and during 1996 or 1998 during trust votes, last time losing just by one vote, that of a Congress CM, who was also a MP.
RE:RE:Three at one place
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 04, 2008 08:57 PM Permalink
Gire toh bhi taang upar. Haarne me bhi shaan. Indian public supported thrice to NDA government but they failed everytime. India shining was great slogan but election can not be won by shiny shiny slogans.
RE:RE:RE:Three at one place
by Ram Sharma on Aug 04, 2008 10:03 PM Permalink
Neither did Congress win election. It got only 145/545 seats and had been losing one state election after another in major states.
RE:RE:RE:Three at one place
by Anuradha Basu on Aug 04, 2008 10:25 PM Permalink
The UPA need not win any election ,if they win 72 seats they will bribe 200 MPs to support them and they have got more than enough money in the secret accounts(acquired by all sorts of corruption during the last 60 yrs)
