Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 663 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
No solid trust in the SC
by Rajaguru on Aug 04, 2008 04:03 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Sometimes its hard to understand the Supreme Court verdicts. Though its the highest justice awarding institution in the country, people who are running it at the end of the day are mostly Hindus or other associated communities. So they easily offer judgements against people like Karunanidhi and do not come strongly against those who persecute the minorities in India.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:No solid trust in the SC
by Rajaguru on Aug 04, 2008 04:15 PM  Permalink
Gujarat and Mr. Narendra Modiji. Minorities are Christians ad Muslims. Is that clear?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:No solid trust in the SC
by r patil on Aug 04, 2008 04:30 PM  Permalink
It is minority which is percetuting the majority
in India by naxalism,terrorism ex north east and islamic terrorism.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
ram sethu????????????/
by Prasad Manokaran on Aug 04, 2008 04:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Let us believe in truth, by not getting carried away by emotions and sentiments. It is true that Hindus always claimed history by myths, vandalism, sentiments or emotions, but these necessarily doesn’t constitute any truth keeping any evidences in mind. Ram (Aryan God) never existed, it was total imaginary figure imposed on Dravidians who were original inhabitants of Bharat (India). Aryans were nomads and came to Bharat around 3500 years ago who were basically warrior and aggresive community. These facts have been rightly recorded by Archaeological survey of India. ASI doesn;t work on sentiments or emotion. This kind of agency are suppose to go by evidences, scientific proof and research. ASI has also confirmed Ganesha is also Aryan God, this Ganesha and Rama concept was bought by Aryans from outside. Myth= mithya. If you believe Ram then we can safely believe Spiderman , superman, He-man also to be future god, say after another 200 to 300 years. Ram, Hanuman are all mythological characters formed by Vaidic writers to be imposed on dravidians. By the way the word, Hindu, India is all terminology coined by Britishers. Hindu ism is a word or a common name of 1000s of small , tribal, regional religions of Bharat. Gods of South India are not known in North, and God of Assam are not known in Maharashtra. No wonder there are millions of mythological characters , deities in so called mythologically founded today’s Hinduism. Any person with right mind, with right sense will

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by r patil on Aug 04, 2008 04:23 PM  Permalink
Prasad ASI and DNA has already disproved Aryan invation Theory.There are no suppoters to these theories any more,not even the hindu hating JNUwallas,you can google this and check.Arya means noble not race.How do you impose an imaginery figure on others ,that to which gives credit to them of building he bridge and winning the war?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by Prasad Manokaran on Aug 04, 2008 04:02 PM  Permalink
Any person with right mind, with right sense will not believe these emootionally charged stories. Western historian and many non-brahmin, non-hindu historian wholly believe Ram and Ramayan has no historical evidences and no antiquity. I apologise for bringing the real facts. Truth must always win, not lies and stories.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:ram sethu????????????/
by r patil on Aug 04, 2008 04:16 PM  Permalink
Yes Prasad truth must always wins,there is no need to "believe" when facts are available that
Ram And Krishna were historical figrues.Whether
they were God or not that is irrevant.As in hinduism it is the people decide who and how their God should be.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:ram sethu????????????/
by kundan kumar on Aug 04, 2008 04:27 PM  Permalink
you don't know about the origin of hiduism steal expressing ur useless thoughts............

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by kundan kumar on Aug 04, 2008 04:20 PM  Permalink
how can u say that what u r telling is truth????????
u must put the evidence in ur support.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by iluvtaj on Aug 04, 2008 04:23 PM  Permalink
All this shows how much ILLITERATE you are and ALSO that you do not know much about our GREAT INDIA (MAHAN BHARAT).

Try to gain some knowledge on what religion means. Regarding PROOFS, ASI and british too conducted some survey and found some good historical evidences, but finally all this need lot of MONEY and people to prove things, which unfortunately we do not have.

It is easy to ask and tell SILLY things like you have written.

Forget about RAM and other gods, religion etc.
Do you know the names of your ancestors and details of your clan/history(only last 500 years)?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:TATAGHATA Mukherjee
by Ravichandran Ramakrishnan on Aug 04, 2008 04:10 PM  Permalink
Your Name is irritating Brahmins.. You Nonsense

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
SC should concentrate other issues also like this
by njk on Aug 04, 2008 03:53 PM  Permalink 

Where these bench/SC sitting when the Karnataka not implement/irresponse when cauvery water not release to TN. Please keep in mind somany threaten issues in the our country, please concentrate on those.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
What is Rajni's Stand
by Parpanna Thevadiyal on Aug 04, 2008 03:51 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

What is Rajini's stand on this Local Issue.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What is Rajni's Stand
by aiyo on Aug 04, 2008 03:57 PM  Permalink
Rajini:
I will support this issue, I may support this issue, I will not support this issue.
I have learnt a lesson supporting this issue.
I may learn a lesson supporting this issue.
I wish I could have learnt a lesson supporting this issue.....

Am I clear ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What is Rajni's Stand
by Parpanna Thevadiyal on Aug 04, 2008 03:59 PM  Permalink
Well said my Friend.
Keep it up

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Please answer these questions for yourself
by MAIYA M R on Aug 04, 2008 03:57 PM  Permalink
i agree with ur views and appreciate ur attempt in bringing this naked truth to the so called secular society. now the rend is that secularism means if u are anti 'hindu', even the media people take a major share in this type of prapaganda.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Please answer these questions for yourself
by Jose PM on Aug 04, 2008 04:26 PM  Permalink
friend.. your emotians one can understand.. and if you see the recent history... the minorities are made by the majorities - to feel "you are minority".. Do you think, all the persons wearing "kulla" are terorists.. Do you think only hindus are saviours of this nation??? Aren't other relegious people contributing for nation building and its development??
Only after - few elites wanted to use the relegion as an instrument for political gains-all these shits of terror rooted up in India.. You know, why communal tensions are planned and executed only in minority majority areas.. dear pls think twice... just to sensitise the majority people that their people are being hurted... many young bloods are taking terror as last option-only because they have no economic opportunities and they are suppressed..

NEVER THINK INDIA IS HINDU NATION-IT SHOULD BE A UNIQUE NATION WHERE EVERYBODY CAN LIVE PEACEFULLY.

Live and Let Live

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Please answer these questions for yourself
by sanjay - verma on Aug 04, 2008 04:04 PM  Permalink
bravo, i suppose everybody has mum after yr reply which is very truly explained

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Coward
by vsgiri on Aug 04, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink 

The Chiefminister should also go against Prophet Mohammad as well JESUS . Iwould like to see the reaction of these backward classes who have come up only through reservation. Most of the BC's and SC's in Tamil Nadu have come up through reservation. Naturally you do not expect anything rational from them. They are the most opportunist Whether it is Stalin or Kannimozhi or his father Karuna , all of them have come up through reservations only. They were not that poor as to claim SC status even today but their behaviour will keep them in the same categorie for generations to come and all those who have embraced other religions too will have the same postion. Anna was in any case not that prejuidiced but unfortunately the present generation is so and the consequence

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Karuna said that our Lord Rama is a Drunkard
by Parpanna Thevadiyal on Aug 04, 2008 03:42 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I have read Tulsi Ramayana, Valmiki Ramayana 14 times I didn't find anywhere where Lord Rama drank liquor or Desi.

Can anyone provide me with Kumba Ramayana.

Please enlighten which Ramayana is correct

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Karuna said that our Lord Rama is a Drunkard
by Sam on Aug 04, 2008 04:39 PM  Permalink

Hi "Parpanna Thevadiyal", if I remember correct MK commented Rama based on Tulsi Ramayana quote only he clearly refered the scence also. But I am sure its not based on Kamba Ramayanam

About which Ramayana is correct, Valmiki Ramayana is the oldest version and others are written on referring this version



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
clearification
by Guest on Aug 04, 2008 03:38 PM  Permalink 

in our constitution those who are an indian citizen and when are told is an abuse to our constitution as one has his fundamental rights to express but he cant fuilfull that on the cost of others

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 663 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message