RE:IT WAS A RESURECTION OF NATIONAL CONFERENCE, WHICH WAS EARLIER PART OF SHAMED BJP LED NDA!.
by gaurav chandra on Aug 05, 2008 04:07 PM Permalink
apne baap se bol ki 1 party bana le mulayam aur maya ki tarah gandi politics karo aur desh ko barbad karo
RE:IT WAS A RESURECTION OF NATIONAL CONFERENCE, WHICH WAS EARLIER PART OF SHAMED BJP LED NDA!.
by rani suri on Aug 09, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
So anybody to stands up for hindus , is a national shame??? People like you are a disgrace to the hindus community.If they protest the breaking of Ram Sethu that means they are looting the poor, if they protest about the Amarnath land they are looting the poor in the name of religion.
We should know by now that there are many Jai Chands in our community. They have caused my defeats in the past by the harm they did.
RE:IT WAS A RESURECTION OF NATIONAL CONFERENCE, WHICH WAS EARLIER PART OF SHAMED BJP LED NDA!.
by All Right on Aug 05, 2008 03:03 AM Permalink
Sudhakar:
BJP is a national shame? Good... .For Congress is an International shame as well as a big liability... :-)
Comments such as yours deserve nothing better than responses such as mine. Coz both are meaningless.
RE:IT WAS A RESURECTION OF NATIONAL CONFERENCE, WHICH WAS EARLIER PART OF SHAMED BJP LED NDA!.
by gaurav chandra on Aug 05, 2008 04:05 PM Permalink
u have said 100000000000000% right.
RE:Omar
by Duniya ka problem Apna problem on Aug 04, 2008 06:08 PM Permalink
no thats wrong....he said " i am a muslim and an Indian"....mr psv, do not mislead people!
RE:Omar
by dnl on Aug 06, 2008 11:00 AM Permalink
BTW, why did he have to say that " I am a Muslim and an Indian" Did any of the Hindus, or christians MPs say " I am a Hindu/Christian and an Indian." What did he want to emphasise.That inspite of being anti India I am India coz India is the best place for Muslims coz they get all freedom to do all anti national activities and still be in Lok Sabha, coz they can say and do anything against national interest in India and still not fear for procecution.
And this so called British educated moronic mullah should think beyond his religion. This just shows however educated these mullah morons maybe,their loyalty or brains are always filled with their stupid religion.
RE:a
by Sun on Aug 04, 2008 11:22 AM Permalink
And this bugger agrees that his speech has satisfied the hardliners(euphemism for militants) are satisfied. Now he can happily go to make the next harvest for votes.
ALL THESE LEADERS HAVE GOT THE HABIT OF SAYING "I AM A MUSLIM AND AN INDIAN." IT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE PREFERABLE FOR THESE LEADERS TO SAY" I AM AN INDIAN MUSLIM."
RE:OMAR ABDULLAH AND THE ILK
by SS on Aug 04, 2008 10:33 AM Permalink
Even if The Muslims go to Great Britain also, they will identify themselves as Muslim first, and then later as British, American, or any other country. So there is no question of Patriotism from them to any Non-Islamic State.
RE:OMAR ABDULLAH AND THE ILK
by R Balasubramanian on Aug 04, 2008 10:51 AM Permalink
Your expectation is genuine but ephimeral. Swami Vivekananda has already said that, an american will also says he is american first not chicagoen, newyorkean,etc. So a European will say he is german, french, etc., and not recognise himself with his city or religion. In India we recognise first with our language, then religion and then caste. This is bane of India and its policies.
Feel happy he did not utter I am a Pakistani and then say it was slip of tongue and correct himself to say I am Indian. It was a great blunder of all earlier leaders to retain Muslims in our country after partition. Once Partition was decided, all Muslims should have got migrated to Pakistan and all Hindus in Pakistan should have migrated to India. But Hindi films would have been orphaned without story lines as many has been churned out only with this subject.
RE:OMAR ABDULLAH AND THE ILK
by R K Reddy on Aug 04, 2008 11:10 AM Permalink
Bala partition was not a bluder, its implementation was. How could anybody in their senses belive that population will be exchanged in weeks ? It should have been a 20-30 year long transfer program. but what is the point of crying now. When we have to live together lets live in peace.
RE:OMAR ABDULLAH AND THE ILK
by R Balasubramanian on Aug 04, 2008 11:24 AM Permalink
you feeling should have reciprocation from other end also. Do you agree? How long can the Hindus be subject to humiliation and attrocities? We liberated Balgladesh from the clutches of pakistan? Their gratitude, sending terrorist outfit to Bangalore and other indian cities did not know what terrorism is except reading in news. So dont talk about peace as if we hindus are disturbing it. You have proved right from your writing that the sayings Reddy's are muslim in hindus which I was objecting it earlier.
Do you know dear Reddy,the after effects of Partition and the suffering of majority hindus in the hands of muslims? Also do you know the fact that Gandhi sat in sathyagraha asking Indian government to part with few hundred crores to Pakistan as it was newly created country and it had no resource to run the country. This is when our country was burning and affected with acute famine.
RE:OMAR ABDULLAH AND THE ILK
by rani suri on Aug 09, 2008 04:29 PM Permalink
Yes it was big mistake that a complete transfer of communities did not tke place during partition. We now have to suffer the consequences.
Why no action from Govt against Omar just think he is root cause of all problem ? During the last no-cofidence speeches, he said, the transfer (temporaray) of land to the shrine board will happen on his dead body.
RE:Omar speech is problem Omar done only for vote bank ?
by rakesh bhat on Aug 09, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
i feel there should be no action from govt. because Omar has just wished for his death.so it becomes our prime responsibility to pray for his as early as it could be possible because after that we can go over his dead body easily and have the land transfer.so my earnest request to all the patroits of india is to pray for omars dead
RE:Omar speech is problem Omar done only for vote bank ?
by purushottam agrawal on Aug 04, 2008 10:51 AM Permalink
Omar abdullah thinks jammu & kashmir is only the muslims properties but he and his allies should not forget that, J&K land first belongs to Hindus of JK and not to any muslims of any other country and if they are the converted Hindus of JK to ISLAM then they should not have any objection to giving to JK Hindu brothere for Amarnath Shrine Board Charitable activities?
