Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 946 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Are we in Taliban
by rahul malhotra on Sep 24, 2007 11:37 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Is this India or Taliban? Someone says something which BJP doesnt approve of means u kill him? i thought going to the court was how it is done in a democracy

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Are we in Taliban
by linus on Sep 24, 2007 11:47 AM  Permalink
i think you should read as to who has issued the call for beheading of karuna.. he is not associated with the BJP. So please stop being a stereotype.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Are we in Taliban
by Rajkumar Singh on Sep 24, 2007 11:46 AM  Permalink
Yes, India belongs to Hindus and those support them. India was divided to two peices only to give away a piece to muslims. Now there must not be same rights og mislims and christians as hindus in hindustan. even if perosns of hybrid origin the so called nehru gandhi family wants!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Are we in Taliban
by SliMShADy on Sep 24, 2007 11:43 AM  Permalink
courts do not have balls

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Beginning of Hindu Jihadism........CONGRATULATIONS
by Dinesh Millton Cota on Sep 24, 2007 11:37 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

If the faith of the entire nation in RAM is intact, don't know why a remark by TM CM should matter at all. Similar things have been said time and again about Christanity and as well as Islam (Da Vinci Code and the Cartoons).



Are we COMPETING with Islamic fundamentalist isuing "Fatwas"







    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Beginning of Hindu Jihadism........CONGRATULATIONS
by ashok pai on Sep 24, 2007 11:38 AM  Permalink
those jihadis that yu describe are nutcases who probably are gutless and spineless. there's no such jihadism outside of islamic terrorists

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Beginning of Hindu Jihadism........CONGRATULATIONS
by Vijay urf Teesmar Khan on Sep 24, 2007 11:41 AM  Permalink
No Fatwa has been issued by any Hindu. Correct your facts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Beginning of Hindu Jihadism........CONGRATULATIONS
by Rajkumar Singh on Sep 24, 2007 11:48 AM  Permalink
Tit for Tat!

Otherwise the rascals who dare to appease the muslims and chrstians taking air and sunlight standing on the soil of bharatbarha will go on barking!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Beginning of Hindu Jihadism........CONGRATULATIONS
by linus on Sep 24, 2007 11:50 AM  Permalink
perhaps.. if you have any other option to deal with madness.. please make a suggestion otherwise stop wailing as i am sure you will never do anything good apart from shooting your mouth off !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Catholic Sonia should be Careful - Tamils Killed Her Husband
by Shivkumar Singh on Sep 24, 2007 11:36 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Religion killed her mother in law. She should not write nonsense to Balu





    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Catholic Sonia should be Careful - Tamils Killed Her Husband
by Shivkumar Singh on Sep 24, 2007 11:40 AM  Permalink
May be Sonia gandi has been afflicted by stockholm syndrome. Her actions towards DMK and muthuvelu karunanithi that directly contributed for her husband's demise seem to reflect that.



Singha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Catholic Sonia should be Careful - Tamils Killed Her Husband
by Shivkumar Singh on Sep 24, 2007 11:41 AM  Permalink
I want to qualify - DMK tamils killed her husband. There are good Tamils too - the non-DMK ones.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pseudo secularism
by venkateswara rao on Sep 24, 2007 11:35 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

India is a country which is surviving and floorishing on its ethical values orelse it would have been like pakistan. Hinduism is the only thing which protecting the country from turmoil. If the country is headed by people of other religion, by this time country would be in pieces.WHen Karunanidhi is talking against the beliefs of Hindu religion, no secularist come out and say to refraining him from doing it, but a person who has masterminded the parliament attack has got support of this so called secularists. Only thing I can understand from this is secularism nothing but atacking hinduism. Nothing wrong in supporting beliefs of other religions, but not at the cost of great religion and also oldest religion with rich family values and freedom in the society. I request all the hindu people cutting across the party lines, come and vote for the party which is for the welfare of the religion as well as the country, otherwise very soon the country will be sold to America by this so called secularists and also I request other religion people also to religious fact for the sake country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:pseudo secularism
by rajesh chauhan on Sep 24, 2007 11:39 AM  Permalink
Will you stop writing these stupid so called articles of yours which are totally nonsense and adding fuel to fire. What is the proof that you are a hindu. Just being born in a family of Hindus does not make anyone a Hindu. So please keep your knowledge to yourself.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:pseudo secularism
by linus on Sep 24, 2007 11:44 AM  Permalink
what is it with you ? He is expressing his views !! why are you challenging him about his credentials ? What is the proof of your credentials ? Or are you from the hypocritical Pseudo Secularist BRIGADE ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:pseudo secularism
by rajesh chauhan on Sep 24, 2007 11:47 AM  Permalink
No one asked you what brigade you are in, did someone. So you be in the brigade that you are in. I have worked for BJP and I know what happens in and out.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:pseudo secularism
by linus on Sep 24, 2007 12:00 PM  Permalink
well in that case you should now go and work for the Congress and then let us know what happens within their party and perhaps make a comparison and enlighten us ??? Everybody knows what happens in out in the system of this country.. why are you talking just about the BJP ? Anyways i never claimed to be part of a brigade.. but i atleast have my facts right that Hindu bashing in the name of secularism is a trend in this country and i am with everyone who stands up against this..!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:pseudo secularism
by ashok pai on Sep 24, 2007 11:40 AM  Permalink
such is the hypocrisy of the nation, the pseudo seculars. its time people voted them out. hindus have to get united, but bjp is a poor cause with no unity and no proper agenda. the hard liners make it a poor choice. unless they realise that - they have to do some good work, not ram and temples, they will remain behind and the pseudoseculars will prevail

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:pseudo secularism
by rajesh chauhan on Sep 24, 2007 11:46 AM  Permalink
Thats well said and I appreciate that. The whole country has to be united or else you will never know who has got into our midst and attacked us. So be careful everyone and let us forget all this. Did not Ram forgive others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:pseudo secularism
by sai rao on Sep 24, 2007 12:08 PM  Permalink
I really agree with you

   Forward   |   Report abuse
fatwa against karuna
by parthasarathy on Sep 24, 2007 11:33 AM  Permalink 

Majority in india will not get due place . i think india should with pak as our pm will be pleased to work under pak to please minorites to get vote. india will not get back the pok even after thousand years.To avoid daily killing in kasmir & the majority people will get asay under pak.
If at all any action is reqired it should be aginst karuna only.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Fatwa against Karuna
by GTC ICAR on Sep 24, 2007 11:33 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Karuna surpasses all boundaries by terming lord Ram as drinker. He issued statements when affidavit row was going on. I don't know how such a seasoned politicians is behaving. A characterless and drinker thinks everbody is like him. But politicians should restrain in issuing Fatwas. It seems he has lost his wisdom due to old age. He should be asked to take rest.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by Only Dude on Sep 24, 2007 11:44 AM  Permalink
Response to Mukhrtar
_______________________

Then why did you guys issue Fatrwa against that Cartoonist? He jsut called Mohammad a Terroist which is true - and by the way and Drug addict is better than a Terrorist!

I can be as rude as you idiot - you us one We will give you two - you stupid porki A.H.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by linus on Sep 24, 2007 11:53 AM  Permalink
I agree with you .. Mukhtar should not forget that his prophet died while having sex with a small girl child.. wonder what he thinks about that ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by Pradeep Satapathy on Sep 24, 2007 11:41 AM  Permalink
yes u r 100% right Ali.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by ashok pai on Sep 24, 2007 11:42 AM  Permalink
lolz, yu took the fatwa seriously ? someone who issues fatwas and later wimps out ? no dude, they arent like your folks who carry out fatwas and are archiac. no comparison sir. mohammad's preachings are the best, pls read the koran and dont comment about charas and ganja (they are produced maximum in islamic states)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by Manmohan Chandola on Sep 24, 2007 11:44 AM  Permalink
Ali, Do not use words like this, as it will create further KIOS. first read about things you are talking then make any remark.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by Indianboy on Sep 24, 2007 11:57 AM  Permalink
Better than ur womanising and child abuser phrophet

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by Jai Jhulelal on Sep 24, 2007 11:43 AM  Permalink
This Vedanti sounds more like a Deobandi!! :)
First Hindu Fatwa!! We've arrived!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Karuna
by Only Dude on Sep 24, 2007 11:43 AM  Permalink
x

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Indian team announcement
by vineet singh on Sep 24, 2007 11:31 AM  Permalink 

According to MS Dhoni if they will win today's match then they will donate 5 croce(Given by BCCI for reaching final) Prize money their entir year salary to the person who will do the needful as suggested by Vedanti..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Fatwa against Advani
by Makarand Sane on Sep 24, 2007 11:30 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Why no fatwa against Advani for callign Jinnah Secular? Did it not hurt the feelings of so many patriots in India? Was it not an insult to the freedom fighters who shed their blood for the independance?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Advani
by eemani kiran on Sep 24, 2007 11:34 AM  Permalink
"to say good about a bad man isnt same as to say bad and filthy about great Lord. people who think this way are real culprits"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fatwa against Advani
by arun on Sep 24, 2007 11:37 AM  Permalink
Karunanidhi a nonsense one who don't how to respect and understand the feelings of HINDU. India is a hindu country not a muslim country. If you compare Jinnah here then i think u r a pure muslim. In India Hindus popoulation are 80% and muslim only 15%. So before comments to a leader first criticize yourself.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Fatwa against Advani
by sangineersha on Sep 24, 2007 11:37 AM  Permalink
Why r u showing insanity. What Karunanidhi has spoken cannot be compared. He has hit on the very roots of Hindu culture. He has to feel sorry for it and all those who can influence him like congress should force him to do so.



What vedanti has spoken is not correct as our religion is very tolerant otherwise If we would have wished so, Karunanidhi would have been silenced ont the day One. Pls always remember this.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Fatwa against Advani
by Hemant on Sep 24, 2007 11:40 AM  Permalink
sangineersha, I appreciate your comments. However, so far we hindus have been tolerant, more than required, that it the reason, all these things are happening.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
punish / imprison people who issue fatwa
by beessmilla on Sep 24, 2007 11:28 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Any person who issues fatwa should be imprisoned and punished very sevearly.

whether such man is a hindu,muslim - mulla,christian,jews.



these people does not deserve mercy of the society.

if any one speaks wrong about Ram let ram punish them.

If any one speaks wrong about Allah let allah punish them

similarly for chritians and jews.

let us keep religion out of place and deal things.country first.

let us control radical elements

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:punish / imprison people who issue fatwa
by Manmohan Chandola on Sep 24, 2007 11:32 AM  Permalink
besmillah,



I agrree with you, both of us any many fellow citizens can understand this thing. But how these mentally chanllanged so called politicians, beureucrats and religious leaders will stop exploiting us at our cost for there pesonal intersts????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:punish / imprison people who issue fatwa
by Makarand Sane on Sep 24, 2007 11:40 AM  Permalink
A muslim cannot speak against Allah and claim that he is still a Muslim.

A christian cannot speak against Jesus christ and claim that he is still a Christian.

However that is not the case with hindus. Even a non beliver in Ram,Krishna,Shiva can still claim that he is a Hindu. No faith in aa particular deity is required to identify a person that he is Hindu.

Its better that we first understand this very characteristic of Hinduism and not compare it with any other religeon which belive in One GOD,one reliegeous book etc.

Majority of the hindus are confused when they try to compare themselves with followers of other religeons.

Hinduism is a way of Life. Its a path and not a destination.Hindutva is much more broad than we think and talk about. Hinduism has accepted many female Godesses into it like Kali ,Durga which were the deities of Woamn dominated indian society before the Aryan invasion.

After few years we may see Gautam Buddha,Nanak , Jesus Christ, MOhammad Paigamber also accepted by hindu faith.There are no boundaries and limits for hinduism. Its broad and let us keep its spirit as it is.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
First Time an Hindu Person has Spoken Correct
by shankar uma on Sep 24, 2007 11:28 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

What ever comments issued was correct and it was right for hindus to support the call . Being be an hindu and living in India it is first step in right direction.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:First Time an Hindu Person has Spoken Correct
by narendra sonar on Sep 24, 2007 11:31 AM  Permalink
more than 200 % correct

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First Time an Hindu Person has Spoken Correct
by vikram chakravarthi on Sep 24, 2007 11:36 AM  Permalink
are u a real hindu people .whether bhagavetgeetha thought u like this.rediff please avoid these sort of stupid comments.nobody has the rights to issue a fatwa against a particular people.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First Time an Hindu Person has Spoken Correct
by sridhar gorantla on Sep 24, 2007 11:53 AM  Permalink
CAN YOU TELL ME WHO TRIGGERED ALL THIS BY SAYING THAT LORD RAMA IS FAKE AND RAMAYANA IS FAKE, INSPITE OF BEING A HEAD OF THE STATE?

CAN YOU TELL ME IF KARUNANIDHI IS RIGHT IN HURTING THE SEMTIMENTS OF 900Million Hindus? He may be an atheist, but AS A NATIONAL LEADER, DON'T YOU THINK HE HAS THE REPONSIBILITY TO ACT SENSIBLY AND NOT MAKE SUCH COMMENTS?

I WOULD SAY ALL THIS IS THE AFTER EFFECT OF HIS OWN ACTIONS. HE SHOULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR ALL THIS.

SOMEHOW, ALL ALONG, HINDUS ARE BEING LOOKED AT AS SOME AGGRESSIVE VIOLENT PEOPLE, BUT ALL HINDUS ARE DOING IS A REACTION RATHER THAN PROACTIVE VIOLENCE.

EVERY TOM, DICK AND HARRY KNOWS THAT WHEN YOU HIT OTHERS OR HARM OTHERS OR INSULT OTHERS, THEY WILL GET IT BACK. WHY DO YOU THINK KARUNANIDHI DONOT KNOW THIS SIMPLE TRUTH?

I DONOT HAVE JUSTIFIED THIS FATWA IF THIS IS A FIRST HAND ONE ISSUED AGAINST KARUNANIDHI, BUT SINCE AFTER THIS CONGRESS GOVT DIDNOT TAKE ANY ACTION AGAINST A MUSLIM MLA WHO ISSUED FATWA AND ANNOUNCED COST TO THE HEAD OF THE PROPHET CARTOON ARTIST, THEN, THIS PROVOKED BJP MP TO GO IN THAT DIRECTION. HAD THIS CONGRESS GOVT DID TAKE ACTION AGAINST THAT MUSLIM MLA, THEN THIS FATWA ISSUING WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO THIS FAR. CONGRESS DIDNOT TAKE ANY ACTION SINCE IT WANT MINORITY VOTES.

IT IS THE CONGRESS-DMK WHO RAISED THINGS TO THIS LEVEL.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:First Time an Hindu Person has Spoken Correct
by shankar uma on Sep 24, 2007 11:40 AM  Permalink
Always two ways are there one is remaing silent and other one is acting on the issues . we have be silent for 1000 of years it is now we have to act upon the issues. I never said we will do that fatwa but he got the guts to come out and say that atleast. for that we have to support an fellow hindu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 946 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Write a message