Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1802 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40   Older >   >>
Not the right approach
by Anant Padmanabhan on Sep 21, 2007 09:02 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The so called 'Fatwa' issued by VHP is not in tune with the line of thinking of a true Hindu. A true Hindu does not take law into his own hands but leaves it to God to punish those who go astray. What the VHP leader said needs to be condemned. It is not in good taste and I am sure no true Hindu would subscribe to such views. Hindus are peace loving and believe in ahimsa. What has been suggested is barbaric and needs to be condemned. The statement in all probability will be used to brand all Hindus as barbaric. I would pray God to give those responsible for issuing the 'fatwa', satbuddhi. It is really very sad that VHP stoops to such levels.

What Karunanidhi has done is unpardonable and I have no doubt in my mind that he is bound to suffer the consequences. It is for God to punish him not we human beings in the way suggested by VHP leader.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Not the right approach
by Roger Binny on Sep 21, 2007 09:45 PM  Permalink
Anant:
First thing First, there is no such thing in Hinduism called "Fatwa". Fatwa in it's basic nature is arbaic and urdu.Hinduism is sanatan,vedic, Sanskrit and Devnagiri. The l99ngi writer at Rediff didnot have a clue what fatwa means, he being pseudo secularist applied to Hindus anyway. And there is no such thing as true Hindu. Either you are a hindu or you are not. You c99lies of south have this notion of mixed values. Not rest of the Hindus. Which god is going to punish Karunanidhi? He is a human being and he needs to be punished by Hindus. Those Hindus who will punish him will be protector of Hinduism and their ethos, you can go back to temple and pray for their well being. It's time to get back to all pesudo secularists and make their life miserable.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Not the right approach
by Surya Kanishka on Sep 21, 2007 09:12 PM  Permalink


Anantha,

Stop behaving like a goat, read the holy Bhagavat Gita, fool.

Lord Krishna Says When you have to fight for saving the honour of the Religion you have to fight and if you die you die for the cause. Behave and think like a Lion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Not the right approach
by Psycho on Sep 21, 2007 09:09 PM  Permalink
what if tomorrow the old man says that mr. anant padmanabhan has kept his name that of a hindu GOD, so he should be killed. what will u do, will u follow ahimsa then too. u might let them kill u, but what if they kill your family, will u follow ahimsa then too,. the truth wbout people like u is that u always cover your cowardice with the mask of ahimsa. first learn what hindu sriptures talks about ahimsa, whwn it whould be followed, and when it whould be substituted with a fight, like the mahabharatha war.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Not the right approach
by YouthForEquality on Sep 21, 2007 09:08 PM  Permalink
Padmanabhan, I am also against fatwa,but world became instanataneous,nobody waits until God punishes him..May be someway this fatwa is good nobody dares again publicly utter bad words against noble characters..But i say do not do anything to barber karuna .if anybody does it is scar to Hinduism

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Not the right approach
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 21, 2007 09:09 PM  Permalink

Well none has it in his culture to do so,.. however this is required in India today ... where it has become a fashion to be Anti Hindu ! ... from Polticians to Media to Artists !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Govt
by Krish on Sep 21, 2007 09:32 PM  Permalink
Unfortunately, ill-informed people are making it a religion vs development issue. The economic merits of the SS project are also questionable. MuKa wants it to further personal glory and establish clanish-rule. Baalu is a like a dog liking tasting meals from multiple-plates. He took up the Quadrilateral project from Khanduri of BJP and you know the fate now, he inaugurated several projects in TN before state elections to spite Jaya, and you know now that none of the projects are moving ahead. Even easy projects: the OMR-IT road project is still stuck years after it was launched, MRTS project, Chennai airport modernization, port modernization, Chennai has also not been added to the freight corridor connecting Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkatta....

When there are least controversial, economically sound, ecologically safe projects with high chance of success, where is the need to rake up controversies. It is because of typical politician attitude- nothing unique only to MuKa- to divert attention from failures.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Osama's mates
by aus ant on Sep 21, 2007 09:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Most of the BJP/RSS/VHP morons are originally from the Pak/Afghan border.They have the same mentality.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Osama's mates
by anand pherwani on Sep 21, 2007 09:07 PM  Permalink
It is evident from your post, that you are a MORON and not others. Yes, and I would also like to include your favourite joker DMK in your esteemed list of MORONS

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:LOL!
by Psycho on Sep 21, 2007 09:02 PM  Permalink
its because morons like u dont stand up against the bad elements within our religion. talking about the other two religions, everone knows their naked truth, so better shut up.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOL!
by aus ant on Sep 21, 2007 09:04 PM  Permalink
Ur name is apt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOL!
by Abbas Kudrati on Sep 21, 2007 09:05 PM  Permalink
U Moron. I have lived in the west. Those dogs discriminate against Muslims.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:LOL!
by HaiHai Sourav on Sep 21, 2007 09:14 PM  Permalink
abbas bhai, discrimination is based on skin color not on religion! no body knows whether you are hindu, sikh, christian, muslims!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOL!
by Roger Binny on Sep 22, 2007 12:39 AM  Permalink
Chiristanity and Islam has respect? They sure do one has morality issue other is hijacked by terrorist. Well Good for you Mohan you are at right place at right time. Wait for your turn to be blown away.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:LOL!
by anand pherwani on Sep 21, 2007 09:11 PM  Permalink
Cartoon, it is not @ fighting, it is about asserting your presence among bigots like DMK who are bent on trampling on Hindu sentiments. For your information,Hinduism is THE world\'s oldest and surviving religion till date and for many more thousand years to come unlike your Xtianity and Islam, which have come much later.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LOL!
by Donald Duck on Sep 21, 2007 09:03 PM  Permalink
islam with respect?

have you been outside india ?

question westerners will ask you is "are you a muslim?", even a lady from phillipines asked me this on seeing our brown skin.

there is no respect.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:LOL!
by Krish on Sep 21, 2007 09:36 PM  Permalink
Mohan,
The reverse could also be true had islamic countries practised freedom. When Malaysian muslims cannot absolutely change religion, when no piece of religious text can enter middle-east your claim of muslims attracting max conversion is meaningless.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:LOL!
by HaiHai Sourav on Sep 21, 2007 09:07 PM  Permalink
Aksing your religion is "No respect" then why didn't you commit suicide?? everyone knows about hinduism, christianity, muslims so just shut up!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
opinion
by Pradeep Narain on Sep 21, 2007 09:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

let any body have any opinion we go about our work as usual. There are so many athiests in the world . lets leave them alone.




    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:opinion
by Psycho on Sep 21, 2007 09:03 PM  Permalink
i want to leave them alone too, but what if tomorrow they say that all believing hindus should be banned/killed/etc. what will happen to you and me. so better oppose them now, rather than just sit back.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:opinion
by vivek on Sep 21, 2007 09:23 PM  Permalink
Nothing will happen.. why do u make them so importamt and give them the power to dictate..

its as simple as pradeep said..
just ignore and dont complicate the issue further more..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
issuing fatwa?
by ice tea on Sep 21, 2007 09:00 PM  Permalink 

hah..lets make issuing " fatwa" a kind of governmment formality. it needs forms, approval and other stuff.we all know what will happen. You got to wait for the fatwa to be issued for years ( even if you bribe). enjoy VHP and dont waste fatwa's on a**hol** like karuna

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by vivek on Sep 21, 2007 08:59 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The people who r cursing and shoutung against karunanidhi...just listen..he had asked u to prrove his existence if u r able to do it, submit it..

It clearly shows ur inability which is causing the anger in you..

this is the fact...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by blue wrox on Sep 21, 2007 09:01 PM  Permalink
Read newspaper.He called ram a drunkard and asked for his degree certificate my friend.



A 5th standard educated guy questioning somebodys credentials.Hughh

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 21, 2007 09:02 PM  Permalink


Ask him to call me, I'll give him full proof,... dont bark idiot.... I know you Converts waiting for such opportunity ! ... dont worry we are not blind followers like you ! and we have not sold our identity for few hudred rupees.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by vivek on Sep 21, 2007 09:15 PM  Permalink
Hi, ur language speaks about u, need not explain in detail mr.pritish... but still all the best

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by Pradeep Narain on Sep 21, 2007 09:04 PM  Permalink
can any one prove the exitence of grand dad of ones grand dad . But that dosn't mean they did not exist.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by vivek on Sep 21, 2007 09:17 PM  Permalink
It can be proved my dear frnd..iam really wondering of ur innocense..!just give a diffrnt example because u r figthing for the losing war...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:ANGER DUE TO INCAPABILITY
by Krish on Sep 21, 2007 09:43 PM  Permalink
Vivek,

Try to justify your name. There is maximum proof for near-past and as you go further away it is going to get murkier. And not every thing is black and white. Even for yesterday's rape-case we will spend years trying to prove. Because it is not only physical proof but circumstantial evidence which is hard to capture. We still are confused about ancestory of India- Indus valley, etc. that does not give the right to Europeans to say that they civilized us. Your logic is close to that.

Given the inefficiency of any govt organization, and political support to anti-hindus MuKa just knows that he can get away with it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RAM Never existed ?
by Prabhudas Jannu on Sep 21, 2007 08:59 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Well karuna is right if any one is having guts let them prove RAM existed scientifically nor historically.Why Hindus are getting angry on TN CM insted prove the issue to
the world.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by Global Analyst on Sep 21, 2007 09:09 PM  Permalink
The thousands of Ram temple, BHADRACHALAM TEMPLE (Andhra), Ramayan , The actual places of Ramayan which are still existing,... etc, all are proofs. Any more proof u want.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 21, 2007 09:04 PM  Permalink

Dear Convert, can you prove Virgin Mary scientifically?

You cant even see your dumb ass directly and you are asking to prove Lord's existence... go wash your ass first !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by vivek on Sep 21, 2007 09:20 PM  Permalink
Mr.pritish i beleive if prabhu cant see his ass,it same for u as well...


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by deepak PV on Sep 21, 2007 09:03 PM  Permalink
prove the person pointed by ur mom as ur dad...okay....get lost u converted ass

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by Roger Binny on Sep 21, 2007 09:49 PM  Permalink
Jannu:
yo low life convert, do you know how to knot your Chaddi's naadi? If you don't then do this knot it around your neck imbicile. You a pile of dung.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by RAVINDRA SITARAM on Sep 21, 2007 09:28 PM  Permalink
Well Sri.Prabhdasji, can you prove that God is existing, if your answer is yes, then Lord Sri Ram is also existing. Let Sri. Karunanidhi not engage in criticising Lord Sri Ram and hurt the feelings and sentiments of Indians and Hindus in particular. Instead he should engage in sincerely working for the benefit of thousands of poor people of Tamil Nadu.
Lord Sri Ram is the world's best known MaryadaPurush and we look at Him for all the ideals we wish and cherish to imbibe in our life.
I feel, by criticising Lord Sri Ram, Sri.Karunanidhi is becoming small,instead he should read Ramayana and learn to respect others.
- Ajatashatru

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by Abbas Kudrati on Sep 21, 2007 09:00 PM  Permalink
Prove that Jesus was the son of God u idiot.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by subramanian iyer on Sep 21, 2007 09:05 PM  Permalink
Before proving Lord Ram was existing in this world, prove that you are born to the only one father or you mother has many husbhand, you beggar, how can u people degrade God. As we are in India, There are crores of people beleive in Lord Rama, we cannot degrade him.... JAI SRIRAM...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM Never existed ?
by blue wrox on Sep 21, 2007 09:02 PM  Permalink
Read newspaper.He called ram a drunkard and asked for his degree certificate my friend.

A 5th standard educated guy questioning somebodys credentials.Hughh

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1802 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40   Older >   >>
Write a message