In afghanistan, HINDU south indians get killed. the central asian countries dont care - unless theyre exporting jehaadis t kashmir or getting OUTSOURCED it work from us. Russia - heard abt the temple demolition? the student murder? The eimirates - the true black holes on mother earth - regularly spew stories of tortured Indian maids/ labourers/ nurses...
BUT why look outside, dudes?
The great baby of that delusional imbecile -nehru - ASEAN. Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal have joined hands to tear this country to bits. we FREED bangladesh, right? but not only are the illegal bangladeshis changing the demographic of HINDU NE states (assam, manipur), they are bombing our cities, taking over dirty labour, forming their own cleric political orgn called MULTA, fighting elections and winning.
The stated aim of ISLAM is the formation of the islamic empire that included the mughal empire in india (their FAKE SECULAR CREDS form another story the ASI NEVER WRITES), the Ottoman empire of the turks and of course the good old fanatics of formerly hindu nations of the far east.
Hindus just get in the way with their foolish tolerance, nishkaam karma, do-whatever-to-us-we-will-bounce-back policy, their superior inteligence, adaptability, their age-old culture.
indian christians spew venom on these pages. muslims - however educated, but at heart TRUE ONLY TO ISLAM - work to cripple our economy. while enlightened Hindus defend them.
RE:HINDUS UNDER ATTACK 2
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:40 PM Permalink
mere saare hindu bhai plz vedas padho aur dekho ki kon tha aur kon nahi. Ther is not any of Gods whome hindu worship. There is no evidance of lord Rama temple before 400 years so why u do not read VEDAS to clear ur doubts and plz ab pandit pe blind bharoosa karna choor do
RE:HINDUS UNDER ATTACK 2
by birju on Sep 15, 2007 04:26 PM Permalink
tu koran aur hadith kyon nahi padtaa...pataa chal jayegaa ki jiss allah ko tu merciful bolta hai,uska messenger uske baare me bahut ghinoney baatein batata hai koran me..........aur ye nahi ki messenger shareef hai....woh toe awwal darje ka jhoota,makkaar,pedophile,incestous,daaku hai.
ASI had hurriedly acted as Govt.'s chamcha. The Director Monuments must have thought that by this action of his perhaps he can grab the DG ASI's post which has been advertised. Actuslly for the past over a decade IAS officers are holding the post of DG ASI. These people are hardly aquainted with archaeology of history. They are just sycophants of the Govt. How can they be expected to justify their posts?
No body bothered to verify from Mr. K.M. Srivastava, former Director (Expeditions Abroad) ASI or Mr. SP Gupta, Secretary Indian Archaeological Society (both of whom are residing in Delhi itself) about their findings in Ayodhya in 1994 which could never be taken forward because of political reasons.
The Director (Monuments) at least is a product of the Indian Institute of Archaeology but he has also forgotten his training and is singing the tune of IAS and the Govt.
RE:ASI Needs to verify facts first
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:35 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
Hindus or muslims or any people of any other relegion acts by their sentiments if ask them to prove then it would be be difficult to prove. ok. you ask muslim has he seen allah? or hindu has seen bhagwan?, people will say no. so it is difficult to prove their existence. but you can feel their existence. so leave us with our belief because we all know there is some almighty power which control everything. you can call him god, allah, or bhagwan. OK .
RE:some issue goes by sentiments
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:36 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
I think while its good to encourage free communication and airing of thoughts, especially on explosive and contentious issues like above, it's important for the responsible dailies/sites not to sensitise through such one-sided articles and attention grabbing headlines. While I agree that denying the existence of the central characters of a faith, that too the manner in which the centre / centre's spokesperson (some SPOKESperson) was insensitive to say the least- what we should refrain from doing is over-reacting. OK, so you blame all your existing ills on the british and west in general and Pat everything supposedly Indian...i think 50 long years of self-rule should have cured us of misconceptions. More importantly the issue is of Ram Sethu/Adam's bridge and it could potentially save billions of dollars of trade costs by cutting the thousands of miles f madatory Lanka travel. The savings to oil, and environental adv would be inestimable. The strategic adv to India immense. The Ram Sethu has been, and lets please accept facts as they are, a natural formation with no trace of anythng man-made. It's time to take rational, prudent decisions without getting over-emotional and anti-establishment.As for faith, I dont see why one cannot continue to have the faith (in any case faith exists in the spiritual realm and not a geographical one) with this issue rationally sorted. I think if it all comes down to God, wouldn't He be prudent to understand why this is being done.
Thanks a lot Mr. Tarun for ur well written article would like to focus on last para "To make the State just and fair, representing Bharat, is the unfinished war of Ram".
To Build A Hindu Rashtra become a seeker and destroy the congressis and lead new sensation called Hindu Sena.
RE:THANKS
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:25 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
Your language is superb but confusing to a few of us. Please clarify as to which of the two that you have mentioned is correct: VEEDAS or VEEDS, or do you really mean it is VEDAS?
RE:Why Immortal God needs the support of mortal humans
by karteik kotagiri on Sep 15, 2007 01:16 PM Permalink
God will come when he has to come. god taught hindus to fight agianst injustice. Thats what advani, togadia, etc are doing. If god himself will come to fight every battle, then why would god give us humans a body, brain, heart, judgement ability , power of thinking of what is right and what is wrong. That means there are some battles against injustice that humans should fight againsst, and there are some battles god should fight. And for that my friend god will come. This fact is even mentioned in the bible and the quran.
RE:Why Immortal God needs the support of mortal humans
by kranti joshi on Sep 15, 2007 01:16 PM Permalink
LORD RAMA WILL SURULY COME WAIT JUST FEW YEARS OTHERS ARE DOING THEIR PART LIKE VANAR SENA DID.
WOULD LIKE REMIND YOU THATWHEN LORD SREEKRISHNA LIFTED GOVARDHAN GOPIS ALSO HELP HIM.
YUGA YUGA HI DHARMASE GLANIBHAVATI BHARAT ABHUSTHANAM DHARMASE SURJAMAHAM TADATMANA
RE:Why Immortal God needs the support of mortal humans
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:26 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
RE:RE:Why Immortal God needs the support of mortal humans
by Amal Prasad on Sep 15, 2007 01:37 PM Permalink
Sri Sri Ravishankar is NOT the pope of Hinduism. For your information, Vedas predates Muhammed by centuries and it is just like having your name written in the annals of the war at Karbala.
RE:Why Immortal God needs the support of mortal humans
by hellboy on Sep 15, 2007 01:40 PM Permalink
I wonder if the Allah is so powerful, they why he needs the support of mortals like Osama, taliban,hamas. If he is true God let him come down from his dwelling and fight bush, isreal, let him send one terrorist bomb. If he is powerful and true he will defend him. Otherwise he will only be a paedophile.
RE:Why Immortal God needs the support of mortal humans
by Amal Prasad on Sep 15, 2007 01:34 PM Permalink
Dear Mr./Ms. Patriot,
Lord Ram does NOT need certificate of mortals like you and me and unlike us, he is compassionate enough to forgive all the living world. His benevolence should not be considered as his weakness. It is the faith that manifests stone into GOD and not the other way round. Jst a question to you, why don't you trample the graves of your forefathers? Scientifically, the corpse gets converted into soil and if analysed chemically, the soil of an area are of same chemical combination, give or take a few milligrams of minerals.
Valmiki wrote Ramayana with good sense to teach us how good will over come evil. But if he is alive today he should have wondered how Indian politicians can give a twist to his age old story. It has become habit of politicians to drag even God to contreversy. Is out nation moving forward or end in petty quarrels. Leaders can you leave Rama and Valmiki in tact??
RE:RE:this article . . .
by avinandan datta on Sep 15, 2007 01:31 PM Permalink
Unfortunately, I cannot. My faith does not allow me to ignore such articles.
RE:this article . . .
by Amal Prasad on Sep 15, 2007 01:51 PM Permalink
Athiest and Faith - What an irony? I thought that an athiest is a person who trust only the scientic evidence. Faith and belief are a matter of superstitions for him/her
RE:this article . . .
by avinandan datta on Sep 15, 2007 02:02 PM Permalink
at least you detected the irony man. There is another word. "sarcasm" look it up.
RE:this article . . .
by narender kumar atri on Sep 15, 2007 01:17 PM Permalink
Just because of people like you we hindus are always at the receiving end. Had this been a religious issue for the Muslims or the Sikh, the Govt would have never dared to give such an affidavit. People like you should be thrown out of this country.
RE:this article . . .
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:30 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by AKSHAYA TRIVEDI on Sep 15, 2007 01:25 PM Permalink
Your Quoran was written by who. Did you get fossils of that man/allah/mullah as evidence. Mr. Saikh all religions are based on faith and not on logics.
RE:RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by avinandan datta on Sep 15, 2007 01:28 PM Permalink
good point. And that is why all religion should be banned. duh.
RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by Moo Glee on Sep 15, 2007 01:09 PM Permalink
Equally foolish to call a warrior who looted and killed a prophet. There were many like him. When faces can portrayed why not his?
RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by Dinesh Kr. Gupta on Sep 15, 2007 01:12 PM Permalink
Do you believe in Koran? Koran was not written by human being it was given to prophet by god. Then why not a spritual power like balmiki can not write Ramayan before Ram birth. Do you have any answer ?
RE:RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Sep 15, 2007 01:17 PM Permalink
Do you know who was Valmiki???And about him?? He was a great dacoit in first life!!!
RE:RE:RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Sep 15, 2007 01:19 PM Permalink
A dacoit can be make a good human but never make a spiritual !!!!Yrs every movements was fiction,ha!
RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by DhruvVishal Saxena on Sep 15, 2007 01:21 PM Permalink
Lolz you and your ignorance is worth a laugh cuz you would not know what faith and belief is..by the way did allah write Koran? Who is Allah?Where does he Live? Is it not JUST A belief? Cuz if ALlAH isnt just a belief...then you being a Muslim is an Idol Worshipper..Rama is OUR Belief and Faith which makes HIM our GOD.. And you are DUH..!!
RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by HK on Sep 15, 2007 01:07 PM Permalink
How come do you then claim that there will be "Qayamat" one day & all ppls sin would be put to result. Are there no visionary preachings in quran?
RE:RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by Abdullah Saikh on Sep 15, 2007 01:11 PM Permalink
It's only belife,but I dont belive it!! If I do some good work ppl should remember me as a good man,if I do bad work ppl should say "AFAT" gaya!! Right??
RE:When Valmiki wrote Ramayana!!
by execute on Sep 15, 2007 01:09 PM Permalink
I know man u want to disturb communal harmony of this country, where Hindus and Muslims living together peacefully, but we will not allow you people to do that.
RE:questioning your faith.
by anoop anantharaman on Sep 15, 2007 01:17 PM Permalink
well...if everything were to be told just as facts, then is no need for a story.. when valmiki wrote he decribed how they were born...but the censor board removed it...f'ing funny!!!!
RE:questioning your faith.
by A Singh on Sep 15, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
What an intelligent question? Though people of your type think that whoever (It was not GOD) was distributing brains thought is best to allot the entire quota of the generation or next few generations to them, and thereafter there was nothing left for others.
However, there are people who thing that the FOOLS can ask the most intelligent questions.
For example I ask you one.
Why is the sped of light 3X10exp8 km per sec?
Just because no one can answer this does not mean that all those who have spent their lifetime researching about speed of light were fools.
RE:questioning your faith.
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:34 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
RE:questioning your faith.
by Amal Prasad on Sep 15, 2007 01:40 PM Permalink
I am sorry but the same question can be asked for anyone's mother. Can you dare to ask how Jesus was born of virgin mary?
Better NOt to play with the faith of others, Mr athiest
RE:questioning your faith.
by avinandan datta on Sep 15, 2007 02:06 PM Permalink
yes. I dare ask. How was Jesus born of a virgin Mary? I am not playing with your faith Amal. Just asking you to think a little. If the scriptures can be wrong about a small thing as how someone was born, they can be wrong about the whole thing.
