Musharaff , lagaving Surma and holding pistols for a TV shot. Chikna Gabbar Singh. Bearded OBL , behind the camera Gabbar Singh. How long will they fool the world?
RE:Musharaf is a war criminal
by Shri Kant on Sep 13, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
"Poor innocents" in Lal Masjid? No way, stupid. They were holding AK47s and other sophisticated arms as seen in photos all over the world. Anway, you will next say that Osama is innocent prophet.
RE:Musharaf is a war criminal
by Madhusudhan N.R. on Sep 13, 2007 01:26 PM Permalink
Those who live by the sword - will die by the sword. Musharraf's (and Bush's) day of judgement will not be far. But, surely, from India's point of view, Musharraf is the bigger evil. I hope our Indian muslim brothers and sisters realize that soon. Specially, those in places like Hyderabad.
RE:Musharaf is a war criminal
by Imran on Sep 13, 2007 02:35 PM Permalink
Dear Zaheen, how can you call those guys who put the life of young children and women in Lal Masjid in danger as innocent .Religion has blinded you and your thinking process. If religion teaches you to store Ak-47%u2019s in mosques then whats the use of religion. Religions specially Islam are a danger to humankind and should be banned. Don%u2019t blame Musharraf he is the kind of leader Pkaistan needs to save tem from the religious fanatics.
RE:WHERE IS RAM ? NO RAM NO SHIVA NO GANESH NO KRISHNA
by RRRChola on Sep 13, 2007 12:43 PM Permalink
Tsunami called UPA struck the GODS world, they have become extinct, we need to look for fossils.
The book by this think-tank is nothing but a waste of sensationalized topics.Do these think-tank activists have any irrefutable data to counter their claims of Musharraf having set up safe havens for terrorists?If questioned,they would only end up with 'According to unnamed sources'.
QUOTE-"The book says Musharraf's direct or indirect role in the IC 814 hijacking was not secret either. There were enough clues to expose Pakistan's hand in the hijacking. Of the five hijackers, four were from Pakistan. These hijackers were constantly in touch with the Pakistan Army's General Headquarters in Rawalpindi.
To facilitate communication, Pakistani intelligence officers in Kathmandu had given them a satellite phone. In fact, ISI and Army officers in Kathmandu had planned the entire operation."
UNQUOTE-Did Musharraf just walk across the table and offer all these facts?Do these think-tank have the code to this satellite phone handed over by ISI?
I am not being pro-Pakistan or pro-anything,but just detest from these so called SENSATIONAL NEWS coming in after the storm has passed over and caused the deaths of thousands of innocents.
The book says that President Musharraf, within two months of taking over, allowed terrorists operating from his homeland to hijack an Indian Airlines flight from Kathmandu and helped create one of the most dreaded terrorist groups, Jaish-e-Mohammed.
RE:SENSATIONAL, SENSATIONALIZED NEWS=GOOD SALES and MILLION DOLLAR PAYOUTS
by Madhusudhan N.R. on Sep 13, 2007 01:37 PM Permalink
What the book states has been known to most people as a gut feel. Only the blind and absolutely dumb will need more evidence about Musharraf and pak complicity in these events. Even now these terrorists are openly roaming around in Pak. Musharraf's 'naatak' is apparent to one and all. Remember, we have also watched the TV reports just after 9/11 when Musharraf addressed his senate and the fundus, by stating that it is strategy which is making him side with the US. He quoted some verses from Hadith where even the prophet apparently used this ruse to hoodwink the enemy and once he had the upper hand and the enemy was complacent, he massacred them. So much for the role model that Musharraf follows. Anyone who could read between the lines and had an iota of common sense knew that the General, who has immense hatred for India, has been the bulwark on which the terrorists have grown and multiplied in Pak. This snake is going to bite the hand that feeds it soon. Have you read reports by Mr. B. Raman, with his incisive analysis? Everyone, including the Yankees, know the truth about Musharraf and Pak. Today, it suits the super power to turn a blind eye. There is nothing new in this 'new' book.
RE:SENSATIONAL, SENSATIONALIZED NEWS=GOOD SALES and MILLION DOLLAR PAYOUTS
by Ratnesh Sahay on Sep 13, 2007 01:47 PM Permalink
What makes you imagine that the author's motive is to give sources of data, rather than to expose the real story.
Besides, haven't you seen all those things happening by yourself, which is being quoted in this article.
What do muslims know of their glorious pre-islamic past in countries like India,Pakistan and Bangladesh? Absolutely nothing! . They hold their own ancestors ,the Indus Valley Civilisation,the authors of Vedas, Puranas,Upanishads,Yoga, Ayurveda,the Epics of Mahabharata and Ramayana, or classics of Kalidas,,the various philosophies (such as Advaita,Samkhya, Mimamsa,etc.),or even modern thinkers like Gandhi,Radhakrishnan,Aurobindo,Tagore,etc.,in utter contempt! They would rather uphold in great esteem tyrants,despots,madcaps,bigots and immoral muslims like Mahmud of Ghazni,Mohamed Ghori,Aurangzeb,Tughlak,and the like. These things are deeply ingrained in their minds generation after generation that they simply cannot see beyond their rotten idealogies.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by on Sep 13, 2007 02:37 PM Permalink
are you by chance aware of the western renaissance movement. This movement inspired the scinetific breakthroughs that the western world has seen since 15th century.
This was inspired by the translation and printing of scinetific journals from the islamic world. The built up on this base.
The vedic period you refer was the aryan race who came from eurasia (afghanistan to russia) and settled in India.
Muslims in India are from the same race as Hindus but the fact is that their ancestors chose to embrace islam during the last 1000 years or so. It was not by force.
I am a devotee of Ajmer even though I am a Hindu and this sufi saint was responsible for 92 lakhs conversion during his lifetime. You have to understand that the moghuls ruled india for 300 years. If the had forcibly converted no hindu would remain today.
you see modern genocide in Rwanda, Sudan, Bosnia, Iraq and this is being done in few years rather than a generation.
Gandhiji was murdered by a fanatic even though he was a devout hindu. I would say he would be the ideal if I have to follow him religiously.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by justlookhistory on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 PM Permalink
>>Gandhiji was murdered by a fanatic even though he was a devout hindu. I would say he would be the ideal if I have to follow him religiously My earlier reply to defame fanatism... Yes i agreed it should not but it was.. See.. I am not teaching anybody about hinduism.. I want to say simple, plz. donot deny your past or justify the killings.. you should restrict only to castism etc.. there is a science much more richer than this which must be studies before commenting.
RE:RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by justlookhistory on Sep 13, 2007 03:01 PM Permalink
rectifying my earlier message... RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell by justlookhistory on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 PM >>Gandhiji was murdered by a fanatic even though he was a devout hindu. I would say he would be the ideal if I have to follow him religiously My earlier reply to defame fanatism... Yes i agreed it should not but it was.. See.. I am not teaching anybody about hinduism.. I want to say simple, plz. donot deny your past or justify the killings.. you should not restrict only to castism etc.. there is a science much more richer than this which must be studies before commenting
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 12:50 PM Permalink
If you Dig the History, you go backwards... There are thousands of wars between different groups of People. That was the Culture of Invasion was prevalent through out the World. The only aspect is Muslims were successful and you Project it for your Favour... Think about King Ashoka, present day Bihari (The Hindu) who persecuted thousands of Kalingans (present day Orissans)... For that you will advice the Orissans to take revenge on Biharis ??? That will be Pathetic... King Harsha (The Hindu) has looted a lot of Kashmiri Temples, will you tell to take revenge ??? I know that I belong to Maratha Dynasty, should I ask for a seperate state for Marathis ??? History is different the attitudes have changed, so dont paint the same Brush....
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by justlookhistory on Sep 13, 2007 01:30 PM Permalink
Ofcourse,Hindus ,Budhists ,or Jains never had religious wars,crusades,jihads ,etc. to further their religion and in this great and ancient country always lived in peace. They did not go about debunking other faiths,proselytising,calling others sinners,polytheists(in a contemptuous manner),they did not invade other countries to harvest more followers,they did not persecute people because of their beliefs. Mind you ,even atheists ( who are called 'nasthiks) are respected for their perspectives.The 'Charavakas',the first atheists, were a contemporary of the Rig-Vedic times(which far precedes your Biblical patriarch,Abraham) and they were not hounded,persecuted and butchered as would have been the case of any Abrahamic religion. Even today 'secularism' has been the Indian ethos only because of the marority of Indians belonging to the non-Abrahamic religions.You don't find people persecuted because of the religion.In free India we had atleast three muslim presidents as head of state since our independence - Dr. Zakir Hussain,Fakhrudin Ali Ahmed, DR. Abdul Kalam ; not to speak of sevral judges of the supreme court ,high courts,chiefs of armed forces,well-known business tycoons,top civil servants,executives,also from the Christian minority groups,which speaks volumes for our secular position and we don't need your sermons about religious morality,when all through your history religion was the primary cause for wars and human misery.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Madhusudhan N.R. on Sep 13, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
Well said, justlookhistory. Anyway, i guess you are wasting your breath and time. Guys like Gladiator are like the proverbial horses, who can only be led to the stream. You can't make them drink. The time has to come when they will open their eyes and smell the coffee & realize the truth about their infamous cult.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by justlookhistory on Sep 13, 2007 01:03 PM Permalink
But not based on religion. There is a difference for fighting for land,money or Religion hatred ness. St. Thomas church was built under the nose of Hindu king and practice their belief and wisdom freely.
we,Indian(Particularly hindu calts) does not believe in supercop system. We have the history of living together with Jainism,Sikhism , Budhism from the past thousand of years. Donot distort your past.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 01:10 PM Permalink
JUST LOOK TRUE HISTORY 1) I dont agree that Hindus & Jains lived in Unity in Indian Past... 2) Once India was fully a Jain Country, what happened to the Jains they are only 0.2 % of our population.. Hindu Kings executed and supressed the Jains in many occassions.. 3) Dont Project yourselves as Peace Loving People.. Bcoz 5000 Years of Aryan Caste System has supressed a greater extent of Indian Population...
RE:RE:RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 12:51 PM Permalink
WISHY, Know about DEVDASIS, The Bharat Natyam is a dance performance which, because of the Brahmin media, has gained much recognition as a form of art. The celebrated Bharat Natya expert, Rukminii Devi, admits in a National Geographic video programme, that the Bharat Natya was really the art of Devadasi (temple prostitutes) to please their audience and admirers. This is the reason why you might have seen various Bharatha Natya's postures in Hindu temples. Maybe like the art of KARATE to the japanese, the BHARAT NATYAM is a national art of the Brahmins and very much part of their culture. The Kamasutra
Brahminism has also created Kamasutra - a set of instructions on how to have sexual intercourse. Some of the postures detailed in Kamasutra are so complex that they only be performed with the help of one or more ASSISTANTS! The Devadasii System Thrives UNI. - TIMES OF INDIA - 10th Nov. 1987: confirms that the practice of dedicating young Harijan girls (mahars, Mangs, Dowris and Chambhar) at childhood to a goddess, and their initiation into prostitution when they attain puberty continues to thrives in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and other parts of South India. This is largely due to social backwardness, poverty and illiteracy, according to a study by two doctors of the India health Organisation.
The report clearly indicates that the Devadasi system was the result of a conspiracy between the feudal class and the priests (Brahmins), who with their ideologic
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by prakash on Sep 13, 2007 12:50 PM Permalink
1. devadasi system is abolished by british!! surprise, but 4 wifes and 200 kids in islam continueing even today
2. sati was abolished by british with the help of bengl hindu pandit
3. india was 500 prinicpalities in 1947 ,when did foreign mohammedans invaders unite India?
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by RRRChola on Sep 13, 2007 12:54 PM Permalink
why do guys get upset by the 4 wives thing. Is it a case of sour grapes, you go ahead and marry 10. Have you been told how many to marry?
RE:RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 01:02 PM Permalink
Prakash, British just continued the Good work of Sultans 1) Temples doing Prostitution in the Name of Devdasis are removed by the Islamic Invaders.. 2) India was controlled from Afghan to Madurai by various sultans Khilji, Mughals etc etc.. Before India was like a group of small countries .. 3) Muslims remarried the Girls, who are about to be Killed from Sati.. Sometimes the Girls are rescued from Fire and given the Status of Wife...by Muslim army Men... 4) Till now the traditional hindu women cover the head with scarf, it is under the influence of Muslims, otherwise the dress code for ladies was very fancy before the Invaders came in..
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Bharat Engineer on Sep 13, 2007 02:17 PM Permalink
But, still the Muslims are backward, as per "Sachar" report. How come the powerful & mighty became so backward? :-))
RE:RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Vasanth Srinivas on Sep 15, 2007 01:15 AM Permalink
Its becoz one man having 10 wives and 75 children and send them to Madarassa for "Scientific" education....!!!!
RE:RE:RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Madhusudhan N.R. on Sep 13, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
Don't make me laugh. Get your facts straight before writing. Rajput princesses like Rani Padmini, resorted to Sati as an escape from the marauding muslim hordes and to save their honour. No muslim soldier took them as wife - those they could get their hands on were raped and forcibly converted. We know how Islam spread in India, so please stop this bull shit, subverting history.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by on Sep 13, 2007 02:21 PM Permalink
if you know a little bit of history. Ashoka had a big empire
so also the khilji dynasty and the slave dynasty
later on the mughals gave a composite identity to india...
the marathas and the sikhs and the nizam were all used by the british to break the mughal empire and therefore there were 500 nationalities at the time of independence.
every village is different to the other yet we are all united as Indians. If it was not for the moghuls and british we would not have got our indian identity...
Also I wish that Pakistan should be there as it is one of the principal reasons that we are united. Otherwise there is racial / language / caste / religion tension everywhere. Every state wants to promote their regional language at all costs. so gujrathis like me have to learn marathi if we want to stay in Mumbai, or tamil if we want to stay in chennai or kannada in Bangalore.
British did not force us to forget our languauge or so the case with Moghuls but now in school a child is forced to learn english, hindi and the local languauge. why should it be necessary ?
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 01:03 PM Permalink
ISLAM CLEANSED THE MISHAPS OF HINDUISM. DUE TO INTERVENTION OF MUSLIMS 1) DEVDASIS IN TEMPLES DOING PROST ARE ABOLISHED 2) SATI CAME UNDER CONTROL 3) CASTE SYSTEM LOST ITS IMPORATANCE 4) INDIA BECOME ONE COUNTRY, BEFORE INVASIONS, THERE WERE MORE THAN 300 SMALL COUNTRIES WITHIN INDIA.. ONLY UNDER THE SINGLE RULE OF MUSLIMS & BRITISH INDIA IS INTEGRATED..
IN SHORT MUSLIMS INVADERS WIPED OUT THE EVIL FROM HINDUISM...
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by justlookhistory on Sep 13, 2007 02:41 PM Permalink
Mr. Gladiator. Earlier i have talked about history not to glorify myself rather your past(thousands of yrs) What i mean to give u look the history of India with an Indian point view not with Mullana point view. Yes i do agree with u , there are some of the bad cultures are now our history. But still progressing and despite of these systems as past. Do you have the guts accept the evil form of arabic culture??? We are have the history of 60 years as Young India. We are become the 8th largest economy of the world despite of all odds.(Bombing..) Imagine how much we are powerful.... What about Pak.?Only mistake pak has done that they intermigle their religion into state affairs.And gone. Look at the Indonesia.That are also muslim country but they have thrown out wahabism of Arabic culture.
Arabs, even they were not knowing there is energy pool on their own feet.
Man...That was your past history not your arabic culture.Try to dig out the earlier science. If there was no such things, then this religiion does not survive with long history.(See about Roman God etc.) It has got basic right.They believe in Science and continuous evolve.
RE:Muslim has made this subcontinent >>hell
by on Mar 01, 2008 12:13 AM Permalink
i dint understand why are you agressive about 4 mariages in muslim but .... let me remmber your own Goddess maried to 6 men at a single time, lolz what sort of teachings you got? you should better think about that but i am not here to abuse anyone or religion just few words, before abusing others religion sneek inside of yours.
