RE:RE:ban rss
by Mohan on Sep 12, 2007 04:05 PM Permalink
Can't beleave these people, there are many paki peopele read rediff and start blogging against religious matters. If you are Indian Muslim I don't beleave you would say this word....
RE:ban rss
by dhanesh maheshwari on Sep 12, 2007 04:07 PM Permalink
be sensible..this is matter of faith..Ram is same of hindu's as allah for you..think rational..
RE:ban rss
by ujwal mehta on Sep 12, 2007 04:05 PM Permalink
u fu.. bsheerudin get out of her u bass..harame katwe.or everybody will bbcome RSS and cut ur remaining.
RE:ban rss
by anil kumar on Sep 12, 2007 04:09 PM Permalink
See don't beleive in supreme court judgements tommorrow it will ask for the proof of Allah's existence. Even if you see people of india were forceably converted to islam by moghal rulers , so the context here is no religion can be preached forcefully ,so it indicates the existence.......
You know who sit at the Center today? School drop-outs, rowdy-sheeters, kingpins of the kidnapping industry, brothers-in-law of Dawood Ibrahim, and others of this caliber. The statement clearly establishes the fact that no intelligence ever existed at the Centre. That is the reason Mahatma Gandhi chose not to become a parliamentarian. The people at the centre would very likely have no school certificate even to prove that they have some IQ.
Idiots deserve a BAD GOVERNMENT. This is what you azzoles deserve.
Tomorrow if you sue this government for not doing anything for them, they will file an afidavit in the court saying there is no proof you voted for them.
RE:Good news for those who voted for Congress
by SURIYAPRAGASH KRISHNAMOORTHY on Sep 12, 2007 04:23 PM Permalink
Yes. In this minority rule, anything is possible.
RE:I appreciate the centrel govt decision
by Indian on Sep 12, 2007 04:03 PM Permalink
Selfish Man, Your name already told you would appreciate anything on the basis of emotions and not logic.
Wait until the same government realizes that it can survive without your vote and it will say it does not believe Prophet Mohd was a real messenger. Then you come back and appreciate. Remember, no religion or ideology has grown forever. Dont bask in the glory of your faith just because it is growing at the moment. It will peak and then slide. At the moment it grows only because it is the YOUNGEST / NEWEST.
RE:I appreciate the centrel govt decision
by Nitin Tripathi on Sep 12, 2007 04:00 PM Permalink
Please put forward the proof of existance of Allah or Prophet.
RE:I appreciate the centrel govt decision
by Vineit on Sep 12, 2007 04:02 PM Permalink
Now ask your people in govt to look out for any signs of Allah for the bridge.. they will find some link. This is the govt of the Muslims, so all in any muslim they will agree, but will always supress hindus.
by Blaster on Sep 12, 2007 03:51 PM | Hide replies
It is a greatest joke to compare Sethu with Holy sites. Please dont compare it with either Temple or Mosque or Church. Its just a bridge either Man made or naturally formed(no proof found).
RE:Please read this mates!
by Indian on Sep 12, 2007 04:07 PM Permalink
It is the greatest joke to compare Vatican also to any holy site. It is just a building man-made and not even naturally formed.
Has your scientific brain figured out the loss of marine life on the world's most delicate coral reefs spread around the cape of South India or is it limited to figuring out the Da Vinci Code simply because it relates to your faith and abusing anything related to any other faith?
RE:SC should reject the affidavit
by Ranga on Sep 12, 2007 04:01 PM Permalink
This Bloody Congress is interested in Muslim Votes. If there is no evidance of Ram, then with what evidance they are spending crores of public money to send muslims to Makka for Yatra
RE:SC should reject the affidavit
by ramesh pawar on Sep 12, 2007 04:01 PM Permalink
why it cannot be answered ..when christians can claim and show evidence that JESUS existence and Muslims can claim that mohammed existence and sikhs can claim that guru nanak existence ...why cant HINDUS ...dont we have enough proofs or literature ...
