Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150   Older >   >>
Humans asking for identity of god?
by Ramesh J on Sep 12, 2007 07:46 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Lord does not require identity. Neither does lord need to prove that he exists. Do you have an evidence to say that Rama does not exist? We, more than a billion people, are saying that Rama existed and continue to exist. What else do you need? Dear friend, please understand that there are so many things in this world for which a human being does not have any answer.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Humans asking for identity of god?
by Anshu Vatsyayan on Sep 12, 2007 07:52 PM  Permalink
Then why the jehadis are killing thousands of innocents on the name of ALLAH. Is He there to see all this ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
USELESS FORUM
by good boy on Sep 12, 2007 07:46 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

DEAR INDIAN BROTHERS OF ALL RELEGION,

IF YOU really LOVE, RESPECT YOUR RELEGION, FAITH, THEN NEVER GO IN REDIFF FORUM .. BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME DIRTY RASCALS, WHO ARE REAL BURDEN TO IS WORLD KEEP ABUSING OTHER RELEGIONS FOR NO REASONS. THESE 03RD CLASS CITIZENS ARE ACTUAL TERRORIST AND WORTH COWDUNG !!!!

JUST TO SOUND SMART THEY KEEP ABUSING OTHERS, THESE DOGS ARE WORTH PIECE OF SHIT.

SO BETTER KEEP OUT THIS FORUM FOR GOOD .. I AM LOGGING OFF NOW AND WILL NEVER VISIT AGAIN UNTIL REDIFF TAKES SOME ACTION BEFORE SOMEONE TAKES LEGAL ACTION AGAINT REDIIFF AND BLOCK THE SITE FOR GOOD !!!!

BYE ... INDIAN


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:USELESS FORUM
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:49 PM  Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.

You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.

But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.

See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Muslims not claiming property -- but claiming lives
by y y on Sep 12, 2007 07:45 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

see the difference and then talk

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Muslims not claiming property -- but claiming lives
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:49 PM  Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.

You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.

But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.

See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Outrageous statement
by Shashank Tikekar on Sep 12, 2007 07:45 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Statement made by the government is outrageous. It shows UPA has no respect to religious santiments of Hindus. It's a shame for Hindus that such Govt is electd by masses & rules the country. No wonder we were enslaved by foreigners for 2000 years

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Outrageous statement
by cycube on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM  Permalink

pure Inter-Hindoo North-South politics

like the old anti-Hindii langauge riots down South in 1950-60s.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Outrageous statement
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:50 PM  Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.

You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.

But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.

See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
good news
by anil varma on Sep 12, 2007 07:45 PM  Permalink 

yes its true , same as in babri majid report.pls
dig your houses also so ther rama playing cricket u can minder ther

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Sonia & impotent PM singh
by y y on Sep 12, 2007 07:47 PM  Permalink
perfect

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Sonia & impotent PM singh
by y y on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM  Permalink
he is not denigrating just implicating the influence of woman names sonia over manmohan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Sonia & impotent PM singh
by goti on Sep 12, 2007 07:54 PM  Permalink
WE are impotent.Because when they say RAM does not exist we are still able to discuss. Can Vatican or Arabian nations exist if such similar statements are made regarding the proof of god's existance in their respective nmames?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Sonia & impotent PM singh
by Cynic on Sep 12, 2007 07:47 PM  Permalink
Woman mohan?? Are you denigrating women as weak ?? Dont you see the chauvinistic nature of the comment?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Sonia & impotent PM singh
by cycube on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM  Permalink

pure Inter-Hindoo North-South politics

like the old anti-Hindii langauge riots down South in 1950-60s.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ram
by Feroz Ansari on Sep 12, 2007 07:44 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Why you all are making so much hue and cry over his existence? Even if Ram existed you ask yourself, whether you really follow him?
How many times have you read Ramayana?Do you really know what it says? Have you ever followed the teachings of Ramayana? Does he destroyrd any religious place as you did to Babri Masjid?Are you ready for banwaas for your religion?
Do you know that its mentioned in your religious scriptures that "Ekkam Evadityam.Duitya naste,nehna naste kichan" which means "Bhagwan ek hi hai.dusra nahin hai.Nahin hai nahin hai zara bhi nahin hai."
Its also mentioned,"Natasya pratima asthi" maning "you cannot make a form or pic of God"
also "Nachasya kasich Janita na Janipa" means " HE has no parents nor any children" Are you ready to follow your religious books?
I am not trying to abuse you please try to understand me.Please read your religious books with meaning and try to follow it .
With best regards.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Ram
by y y on Sep 12, 2007 07:51 PM  Permalink
very well said feroz...may be we are not extemist, fanatics, we are liberal and peaceful doesnt matter we read it or not we are more peacful and tolerant than you..above that ...i wonder wat you quran teaches...murders, blasts, guns, wat not butchering innocent journalista by head...eeeks dats your religion

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram
by Shashank Tikekar on Sep 12, 2007 07:51 PM  Permalink
Please tell me what Holy Koran says. Does it say to be intolarent to other people. Does it say kill the human beings who do not subscribe to your belief & treat women inhumanly? Better first put your house in order.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram
by Feroz Ansari on Sep 12, 2007 07:58 PM  Permalink
Quran says if a human kills a single innocent human it is equivalent to as if he has killed the whole of humanity.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram
by Manu on Sep 12, 2007 08:09 PM  Permalink
Thats why the followers killed Hazrat Mohhamad daughter and her son Ali and Hussain and after that Islam was divided in to Shiya and Sunni, Now both are claiming that they are following the Kuran.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram
by Ashish Kumar on Sep 12, 2007 07:51 PM  Permalink
come my dear friend convert to hinduism and enjoy the spiritualism. Dont go fasting and kill urself. Enjoy the freedom provided by hinduism. No bonds to pray 5 times, cut ur p en nis after birth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram
by Sunil Agrawal on Sep 12, 2007 07:47 PM  Permalink
How many temples were destroyed by Muslims through out India?
How many more years will you cry for Babari structure?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram
by George on Sep 12, 2007 07:47 PM  Permalink
looks like you guys have read your violent religious books very thoroughly in hate spreading madarsas, thats why your community is in full swing to destroy the world.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramasethu
by Viswamitra Chevendra on Sep 12, 2007 07:44 PM  Permalink 

It is ridiculous to the core. How can they trash belief of near to billion hindus. We don't require scientific evidence to proove existence of God. And for hindus it is Ram and better the SO CALLED SECULAR GOVERNMENT mend its ways.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hindu sentiments is more important than actual truth
by venkat on Sep 12, 2007 07:44 PM  Permalink 

Dear Friends

I came across this remark which makes a lot of sense:



All beliefs in all religion around the world is depended on faith and following. Hurting the feelings of the faithfull is LEGALLY WRONG and is ILLEGAL and it is a Constitutionally protected right.



No one can "Scientifically prove" that Jesus Chtist was put on a wooded cross, though many try to proove this, but not proven as of date, no one can scientifically proove, NASA or no

NASA, that "Kaaba" is a Holy site, or that God appeared in front of Moses or Novah built an ARK - these are the beliefs of the faithfull and written in their holy texts. A thousand years from now no one may be able to

"Proove" that Mahatma Gandhi or EVR Periyar ever existed. Even photos [old black & White] they can say is the trick of an artist's creation.



The value of a Diamond cannot be tested in a Physics lab or in a Chemistry lab where a speck of Carbon is only worth less tha one paisa.



Let them argue that the fact that a billion faithful followers of the Hindu Dharma believe is good enough proof that the site is holy and that should be the end of the argument.



A group of non-believers like communists, Atheists DMKs, Anti-Brahmin and Anti-Ramayan crowds of DK and all the supporting non-Hindu politicians can not and should not decide on this facts given in the faith as the followers of the Purana and Ithihasa of Ramayana bekieve and worship.



Just as Hindus cannot make a decision on St Paul's Cathedral or any H

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Fact Vs Faith
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:44 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.

You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.

But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.

See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:Fact Vs Faith
by venkatesh s k on Sep 12, 2007 07:49 PM  Permalink
Then can anyone build Temple or Church in Mecca...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fact Vs Faith
by Thalaivar on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM  Permalink
Ok...let us build a market or big latrine in the place of Mecca masjid so that it will be useful for all.
Anyhow muslims like Imran Patel is not having any objection

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Fact Vs Faith
by ravish sinha on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM  Permalink
Break all kabba & make hospital at that place. Whether u agree for this. I am hindu. But I will also not agree for breaking kaba or any mosque. Same is the case for Rama Setu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fact Vs Faith
by venkat on Sep 12, 2007 07:45 PM  Permalink
So you are not claiming that the Kaaba is property of the muslims?!!

What crap bullshit you are.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Fact Vs Faith
by Hemant on Sep 12, 2007 07:51 PM  Permalink
Through the same belief, Lord Rama also exists.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150   Older >   >>
Write a message