I came across this remark which makes a lot of sense:
All beliefs in all religion around the world is depended on faith and following. Hurting the feelings of the faithfull is LEGALLY WRONG and is ILLEGAL and it is a Constitutionally protected right.
No one can "Scientifically prove" that Jesus Chtist was put on a wooded cross, though many try to proove this, but not proven as of date, no one can scientifically proove, NASA or no
NASA, that "Kaaba" is a Holy site, or that God appeared in front of Moses or Novah built an ARK - these are the beliefs of the faithfull and written in their holy texts. A thousand years from now no one may be able to
"Proove" that Mahatma Gandhi or EVR Periyar ever existed. Even photos [old black & White] they can say is the trick of an artist's creation.
The value of a Diamond cannot be tested in a Physics lab or in a Chemistry lab where a speck of Carbon is only worth less tha one paisa.
Let them argue that the fact that a billion faithful followers of the Hindu Dharma believe is good enough proof that the site is holy and that should be the end of the argument.
A group of non-believers like communists, Atheists DMKs, Anti-Brahmin and Anti-Ramayan crowds of DK and all the supporting non-Hindu politicians can not and should not decide on this facts given in the faith as the followers of the Purana and Ithihasa of Ramayana bekieve and worship.
Just as Hindus cannot make a decision on St Paul's Cathedral or any H
