RE:Need of Hour!!
by adrgdr on Oct 18, 2007 02:49 PM Permalink
Why dont you write also about Kashmiri Hindus who have been displaced because of Muslim brutality? Is it that you are a muslim who cannot speak about it or just that you are with two tongues?
RE:Need of Hour!!
by birju on Oct 18, 2007 03:46 PM Permalink
when hindu hitt rakshak modiji is discussed,the barbarity faced by hindus in india will be discussed naturally!
RE:Need of Hour!!
by A Singh on Oct 18, 2007 02:53 PM Permalink
So you are back. I had been missing you. Look at pages 7 and 8. Like you, I too abhore BJP. But not because they are Communal or Secular, but because they are Fools.
RE:Power Hungry!!
by Sahadevan KK on Oct 18, 2007 02:55 PM Permalink
Congress has no other front friend than the Left to do good work. Congress must make a front who are secular. Now those leaders come in Congress, who were leading of beheading Muslims on Gujarat carnage 2002.
RE:Power Hungry!!
by Sahadevan KK on Oct 18, 2007 02:58 PM Permalink
News: UPA an opportunistic alliance, says Advani Comment: Advani is a person who inserted Jinnah in the RSS idoeology when he got opportunity.
RE:Power Hungry!!
by birju on Oct 18, 2007 03:49 PM Permalink
shahdevan khan knows his posts are treated as trash by patriots...no wonder he keeps repeating the same again and again,with no awail.......poor mulla!
RE:Power Hungry!!
by Manikandan Thirumoorthy on Oct 18, 2007 02:54 PM Permalink
one of the decent comments you have made..aceventura...But understand..Why do you call these people communal..??? tell me that first...someone supporting the cause of hindus??whether they are doing it truly or not...thats for hindus to decide..! who will stand up for issues relating to hindu affairs...all your political kickbak parties will come for help and solve our issues?? or you wil come forward...dont be blind to call them communal force..They are collective force..!!yes there are fanatics..in every party..SO also in VHP..RSS. and so on..dont cry foul on them..!!Obvioulsy your last point was right..India needs efficient ..honest and strong and highly moral leadership...!!i would welcome it from any party..BJP or CONG or THE LEFT...let someone from any party emerge i dont mind..But they should keep in mind both majority as well as minorities in their mind...not only minority...as some poor brains do now..!!!
Modi is a hypocrite. He is showing off. He is putting up posters because he has nothing else to show. Even in media surveys his ratings have plummeted. In Rajkot, he won only by 14,000 votes. He is the weakest CM by that yardstick
He started corruption with the Sujalam Suflam water project. The issue is that Modi indulges in corruption at higher levels and takes huge bribes and doesn't get involved in small amounts.
Also just wait when the Haren Pandya case (Pandya was a BJP MLA who was killed in Ahmedabad)will be opened. Everything was manipulated when it was investigated but the truth will come out one day.
After Godhra, the riots followed. The state chief minister was the 'mukhya sutradhar' of the Gujarat riots. Even the truth in the Akshardham massacre will come out after Modi falls.
RE:Modi is a Hypocrite!!
by Ranjith M on Oct 18, 2007 02:42 PM Permalink
Afer 10 yrs of rule by BJP Gujrat has become the most prosperos state that rest of india. They doubled their wealth or more in last 10 yrs.. The majority of the top 100 rich people in india come from small state Gujrat.. Hardly we can see proverty in Gujrat...
Let this story repeat in Bihar and UP.. so we can remove atleast 15% for proverty from India..
Let Modi rule India so we can dare to dream a day where all bihari's,bengales and bhayyas have good food to eat.. good dress to wear and good homes to stay..
However,the question would arise is whats wrong if BJP is trying to raise the issues for majority,given the fact that Congress,DMK,CPM etc. seem to be batting for the minorities only.
RE:Majority minority
by A Singh on Oct 18, 2007 03:00 PM Permalink
Dalitji Ram Ram. Secular minded people will see to it that you remain a Dalit, and never integrate with the largeer Hindu Society. Keeping Hindus divided and trying to increase the gulf dividing them by showering peanuts like reservations, is a secular activity. By keeping Hindus divided, the seculars are giving choice to Muslims to unite with faction they like. If Hindus start behaving like a monolith, Muslims will have no choice but to unite with the monolith. Thus working for Hindu-Hindu unity is the most secular service one can do for the country. By this definition, Modi is the only secular leader in the country. You should have no objections to voting for him.
BJP is using Ram to get power their only religion is money and power. Politicians lack any morals they can change their ideologies any time to get votes.
RE:All r power hungry
by wani bhardwaj on Oct 18, 2007 02:29 PM Permalink
BJP does want to get sympathy of communal or psuedo communal people like you. They are not a power hungry person my dear.
RE:All r power hungry
by Imran on Oct 18, 2007 02:37 PM Permalink
Dude I%u2019m not a communal person infact I%u2019m against organized religion including islam. Religion is a handy tool for terrorists,clergy and politicians to exploit the common man. If you think BJP is not power hungry then u r living in another world
RE:RE:All r power hungry
by Sahadevan KK on Oct 18, 2007 02:31 PM Permalink
Sangh Parivar goons use my to name to write comments. Those illiterate person are modi's supporter, who are always ready to kill other people.
RE:All r power hungry
by wani bhardwaj on Oct 18, 2007 02:50 PM Permalink
Mr. Sahadeven, I appreciate of your comments on various issues. But I cannot understand the ethics you are chosing to find out meaning of communal and non-communal. I am very much aware about the communal attitude of Indian National Congress during the 1957 and 1967 and your Kerala Govt. now facing from communal forces who are fully supporting the Congress Party since the formation of Kerala. You simply forget to mention about communal politics of Indian National Congress and the root is lying on this political party and not on BJP. As per BJP is concerned, what I understood from the artciles and consitution of this organization, they are not communal and playing communal politics. Their policy is not to appease minority or majority community. If you are trying to appease some body, then you are becoming communal or helping communal forces. Their main agenda: abolition of Article 370, Uniform Civil Code: I don't think anybody can make any voices on this issue. But on Ayodhya Issue: Yes, this has to be sorted out. However, if there is a WILL, there is a WAY on this issue as well. MAIN RELIGIONS REPRESENTATIVE comeforward and find out a solution and make out of court settlement in this issue. WE KNOWS THE HISTORY and that is why as per ME, there should be BOTH - TEMPLE AND MASJID, CAN BE MAKE CHURCH and GURUDWARA side by side FOR THE SAKE OF PEACE OF ALL.
EC SHOULD ACT AS AN IMPARTIAL BODY and then PREACH OTHERS TO DO SO!!!
by wani bhardwaj on Oct 18, 2007 02:28 PM Permalink | Hide replies
We are not understanding the outrageous, callous and threatening behaviours of EC during the election period. There is a compliant against Mr. Navin Chawla pending in the EC and it is still not heard and finalised, who is a political parties supporter which is the gross violation of the EC rules. I don't know when EC will takes appropriate action on this issue. What is the meaning by deciding its verdict on this particular important issue after Mr. Chawla completes his duration as EC? Is it a TRUE DEMOCRATICY WAY OF FUNCTIONING, EC? You are always, even in UP done greatest mistakes while doing your election process wherein YOUR ACTIONS AND OMISSIONS KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY gives support to the Congress Party. Their actions shows the bias attitude. EC SHOULD STOP THIS TYPE OF IMPOSING DECISIONS ON STATE OR CENTRAL GOVT. UNTIL AND UNLESS IF THEY ARE NOT VIOLATING THE PRINCIPLS OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. As per EC, they have the right to change the employees at their own will? There is a TIT FOR TAT POLICY ON THIS ISSUE AS WELL. IF EC IS ADAMANT TO USE ITS EGO POLITICS while election, instead of doing election as an IMPARTIAL one, then against the complaints of EC appointed persons are there during the election, the elected govt. can TAKE ACTION on those officials? Is it right thing? EC to decide.
I am not sure what Sahdevan means by Hindus and lower castes.Is he trying to say that "lower castes" are not Hindus? Also,I disagree with the term "lower caste" itself. In my opinion there only the following castes: i)Forward caste(which are relatively more well to do) ii)Scheduled caste(or dalits .These castes are mentioned in the schedule of the constitution hence the name).These have been provide special previlges by our nation to help them gain social equality.
iii)Backward castes:As enshrined in the government notification.
Thus divisive people like Sahdevan need to be exposed.