This is the same prime minister who tried to bluster his way to get the deal. Sidelined all important political parties including his allies, BJP etc that were neccessary to pass this national deal. Its a deal between nations and not between the INC and the republican party. Contrast the approach of the normally high-falutin republican administration with its opponents on this opposed to that of Mr Singh. Had he agreed to an up and down parliamentary vote, this deal would have been passed. Instead now he is forced to eat crow. Not only on this but also on the important second tranche of reforms has this PM failed to deliver. For some claiming to initiate the first phase of reforms he surely didnt even try this time. He and his italian mami have been caught trying to bluster and that too by the pinko's. Not only on this but also on nepal he gave in to the pinko's. Unbelievable, this is the worst prime minister ever.
RE:Finally gives up
by Sahadevan KK on Oct 12, 2007 02:34 PM Permalink
Drama may start again within some days. Left is much vigilant. see my latest blog. http://sahadevan.wordpress.com/
RE:Finally gives up
by Vijay urf Teesmar Khan on Oct 12, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
Instead of giving up he should have tried to get some points cleared from the deal and seek NDA's support to go through. But he has no courage of keeping his earlier stand. This is why I call him Woman Mohan Singh. He is good only to lick chappals of Sonia Maino.
RE:Finally gives up
by Sandeep Pillai on Oct 12, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
You guys are also talking on the same lines as the LEFT parties. You are making this into an EGO issue and forgetting that the Nuclear Deal is an important one for the country. Has anyone looked at the positives that we will derive out of the deal? I am not saying that we must not safeguard the security of our country, but at the same time do not just reject a deal because you are in a position to topple the government. The power (read electricity) situation in the country is worsening day by day and the nuclear deal help us use nuclear power to solve the problem. In the greater interest of the nation, stop playing petty politics and allow the deal to go through.
RE:Finally gives up
by Lost Indian on Oct 12, 2007 02:08 PM Permalink
In how many years from signing the 123 agreement will we get electricity does anyone knows here???
RE:Finally gives up
by Lost Indian on Oct 12, 2007 02:34 PM Permalink
No to built a nuclear site will take minimum 6 years provided you have already identified it with all the geological survey. The on the site will be reactors place so another 5 to 7 years to built the reactor and about 6 months to commercially produce the Electricity. Simultenously the govt has to start building the power grid to distribute the electricity. Till then the cost of Uranium and Plutonium will have reached a new high as China has started acquiring all the uranium mines in Africa and Eastern Europe so by the time we have the reactory producing the electricity the 123 agreement terms ends giving more force to USA to bind a new agreement to feed the giant we have brought from them. Common sense it more profitable to America than India, this same period can be used to develop our own capability give what our scientist demand and see the results. I am sure Indian will come up with a much better and cost effective solution.
I am with the PM who is showing courage of conviction and difficulties may be overcome through this. The country needs are many, Views may continue to differ. Our choice should be the best alternative for people of India. Left parties work with limited views as the have their base in differences in classes and catagories. They may not be able to amend themselves as long as their political needs sre served. But they will have to pay heavy price of elimination at some stge if they do not see the changing world of ours. Globe has shrunk, they should realise and put their best foot forward. May GOD(which they not believe in public) give them good sense.-Dr B K Jha
Congrats for advancing national interest without fearing reds and blacks. What Bajpai ji conceived ,Mr Singh has translated into action. Both are nationalists in true sense. Go ahead. India is with you. Few red are odds and not India. Move on for prosperity of India.
RE:Nuclear Deal
by Vijay urf Teesmar Khan on Oct 12, 2007 01:47 PM Permalink
You don;t know Congress. It has nothing to do with national interest. Actually its name is Kag-race i.e. the race of Crows.
He runs the show without actively in politics which is the forte of his boss. The backtracking on his stand on nuclear deal after calling it in national interest shows that the charge against him of demeaning the position of PM & person with no backbone has a substance
RE:He has learned to change colours like a politician
by Vijay urf Teesmar Khan on Oct 12, 2007 01:48 PM Permalink
Woman Mohan Singh is worse than a Girgit. He has no guts to face elections.
Thnak God, we have a Pm who is more a economist and who thinks of his country. I appreciate him not being a politician in the sense we see today. we are all enjoyin the fruits of the economic liberalisation he initiated. Thnak yOu Mr Manmohan sIngh. you are the best and the most visionary Pm we have till date. MAy u do well and all your dreams for your country come true. truly there is much work to be done, to eradicate poverty and all have good life is top pririty. Plz work on health care too. God bless you.
RE:A visionary PM
by Dipak Bose on Oct 12, 2007 01:54 PM Permalink
20 years from now Manmohan would be looked upon as another Jail Singh, a sycophant servant baburchi khansama of the Gandhi family.
RE:A visionary PM
by smarajit sarkar on Oct 12, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
Hi sir, what fruit you are talking about? According to a shocking recent report, 836 million Indians live on a per capita income of less than Rs 20 per day. For 40 million Indians per capita income has improved only from Rs 9 per day to Rs 15 per day.Congress formed to struggle to eradicate imperialism from India. Manmohan Singh struggles to bring back imperialism in India. Ultimately he has surrenderd to left. I agree with you in few points. yes he is honest and knowledgeable person. but i think he is not democratic other wise he will listen to the majority of parliamentarians. so you can think politicians are useless but they understand the pulse of the people that is the reason they have been elected by the people of India. our pm (who has never won a election) may be loved by few urban rich elite but never become a mass leader.
RE:LEFT IS ANTI-NATIONAL AND PRO-CHINEESE!!
by shankar on Oct 12, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
I absolutely agree with u mate! Left always will be left, it will never become right for the country!
RE:RE:LEFT IS ANTI-NATIONAL AND PRO-CHINEESE!!
by Dipak Bose on Oct 12, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
Left is Right on this issue of Nuclear Deal. China-Pak are not worried about this deal at all. They will do whatever they like and USA will approve. China is already made a contract to supply 6 nuclear plants to Pak. There is no need for PAK to sign any Deal with USA. However, Manmohan is saying India must sign otherwise earth will fall on India. Get rid of Manmohan, he is an agent of USA.
RE:LEFT IS ANTI-NATIONAL AND PRO-CHINEESE!!
by vivek on Oct 12, 2007 01:56 PM Permalink
Hi frnds... i dont accept completely... left parties have some issues.. u cant completely brand them as unpatriotic... we have to learn abt nuke deal and then comment onit... by the way i dont blame congress also... pls politicians tell us in public wht is troubling u in nuke deal.. may its time forthe people to understand and approve it..
RE:LEFT IS ANTI-NATIONAL AND PRO-CHINEESE!!
by smarajit sarkar on Oct 12, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
This is a democratic country. Do not call any body a traitor unless you can prove it ge . This is a bad taste. wheather left is getting money from china or not it is different thing, but it seems you are getting money fron US. why you are adoring US for killing millions of innocent people right from Hiroshima to Vietnam to Iraq ? Do you think any body who is opposing the almighty Bush is a traitor, chamcha of Chinese.
RE:disgusting
by olvine furtado on Oct 12, 2007 01:41 PM Permalink
You seem to be a 'left' without any aim in life for yourself or for the country. Instead of being left in the dark work to achieve growth for the country. You can only sit and critisise.
RE:disgusting
by Desi on Oct 12, 2007 01:57 PM Permalink
Well, great that you assumed what I am sitting and criticizing. Even after having few congress leaders in my family I never voted for congress... Did you ever go and vote? I can't vote for every one else if that is what you want me to do.. may be i'll think of booth capturing against congress in next election
RE:can u believe this ? A white woman is remote controlling India.
by kiainth on Oct 12, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
varghese, came from Italy with Sonia and may be relative of Quottarochi
RE:can u believe this ? A white woman is remote controlling India.
by kiainth on Oct 12, 2007 01:25 PM Permalink
Only an italian can talk in this manner not an indian.
RE:RE:can u believe this ? A white woman is remote controlling India.
by Lost Indian on Oct 12, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
She married indian not for the sake of love for India but for here personal feelings, Her husband died bcos of his misdeed of sending Indian army to Srilanka. Why she has to take the command of the Congress, why fight elections and show as a devi of sacrifice. Amity is one of the worse place in India with hardly any developments what has she given back to the area wher she has been stood from. Maybe se can this time stand for elections from Delhi to prove her might. On our foolishness she is enjoying all the benfits of being the King maker. Can you please tell some good acheivements the UPA govt has given us in this 3 1/2 years.
RE:can u believe this ? A white woman is remote controlling India.
by kiainth on Oct 12, 2007 01:33 PM Permalink
Another son of Italian surfaced in this discussion
RE:can u believe this ? A white woman is remote controlling India.
by Cutlet Gravy on Oct 12, 2007 01:48 PM Permalink
Hey KIAINTH,
What makes you think you are so superior, my fellow Indian, that as soon as there is a view that does not agree with yours it is that of "Another son of Italian surfaced in this discussion"!!!
It's people with a warped mentality, like yours, who ought to learn to grow up.
123 Nuclear Deal is Best For Indian Economy. Suman Sibal.M.Tech Civil 123 Nuclear Deal is Best For Indian Economy. I really appreciate Manmohan Singh,India's visionary,for having made this biggest effort for India to become Developed Nation by 2020.Nuclear Deal will be benificial in all these ways: 1)India to attain Civilian Nuclear power for self sufficiency in Nuclear Energy. 2)Good Relations with America & all friendly relations taking India's Foreign Policy to New heights. 3)Pave the way to Attain permanent relationship at UN. 4)Become a Developed Nation by 2020. Best of Luck to Congress & Manmohan & Sonia Ji. Suman Sibal Highly appreciate Congress's stand. Congress should remain firm on nuclear deal. With Best Rgds,Suman Sibal.M.Tech. Mob:9910237788.Posted from Delhi. Email:sumansibal@yahoo.com website: http://sumansibal.freeservers.com
RE:123 Nuclear Deal is Best for Indian Economy & hencewith for whole world. Suman Sibal.9910237788
by Sahadevan KK on Oct 12, 2007 02:34 PM Permalink
Drama may start again within some days. Left is much vigilant. see my latest blog. http://sahadevan.wordpress.com/
Who cares this man ( so called PM ). Neither the congress party ( Pranab da is more trusted man of Sonia). opposition or even a common man of this country knows his authority in the government. this is very unfortunate that he has become an rubber stamp of sonia and loosing his identity as economist.
RE:PM on nuclear deal: We have to move on
by ss on Oct 12, 2007 01:07 PM Permalink
i don't think sonia has political acumen to keep men like MMS, pranab as her subordinated. It may be otherway. Sonia might be following whatever MMS and pranab recommend,
RE:PM on nuclear deal: We have to move on
by chanakya maurya on Oct 12, 2007 01:29 PM Permalink
her lust for power and cowardice, unlike her mother-in-law, is bared. After all, she does not possess that DNA down the line.
